AOC gets her own comic book!

[jack]

LOL considering it's the Daily Caller that's doing all the Trumpeting I have a feeling it's "wishful thinking of the week" Not a peep in the "real world" about this...

Wonder why that is? You think this is going to shut these women up.

Makes me smile.

 

[The Question]

Sad that Coyote scooped me. I was going to post that story with the title "Issue #2: AOC Goes to Prison."

In which she eats the soap and scrubs her cooter with the meatloaf.

 

[The Question]

LOL considering it's the Daily Caller that's doing all the Trumpeting I have a feeling it's "wishful thinking of the week" Not a peep in the "real world" about this...

Wonder why that is?

Because it's not part of the narrative they're pushing. LOL @ you thinking mainstream media publishes the news instead of pushing a narrative. How does it feel to be that naive?

 

[Starship Coyote]

Because it's not part of the narrative they're pushing. LOL @ you thinking mainstream media publishes the news instead of pushing a narrative. How does it feel to be that naive?

Naive? Jack? C'mon... not him surely.

Short stuff is so in love with the radical left because he thinks they'll legalize pedophilia and he'll be able to suck prepube dick with impunity.

I mean, he's the only person I've ever seen on Google Images with a NAMBLA shirt on, so what conclusion can you draw from that?

 

[jack]

That you take fake news from a dead stalker and try to make it relevant? Nice fail fuckley.

On that note, people who try to play the pedophile card over and over are probably the ones we should be looking out for.

Just like you

 

[The Question]

You know that's not even a little bit convincing, right?

I mean, well played not denying the image exists, points for that (because you're probably concerned that Coyote could present said image) but yelling "fake news" on it is watery marinara. That is to say, weak sauce.

 

[jack]

I never said that. What I said was in essence "Every time you point a finger at someone, you point three back at yourself." i'm not concerned about anything. The perp that did that died three years ago and I got a rather large settlement from the family in the end. Guess why? That's what happens when you prove defamation.

He must mention touching children with nearly every post. I'd say that's a pretty accurate portrayal of who is in the closet about it.

 

[The Question]

I never said that. What I said was in essence "Every time you point a finger at someone, you point three back at yourself." i'm not concerned about anything. The perp that did that died three years ago and I got a rather large settlement from the family in the end. Guess why? That's what happens when you prove defamation.

He must mention touching children with nearly every post. I'd say that's a pretty accurate portrayal of who is in the closet about it.

I don't think you're a closet kiddie toucher. I never said anything about any closet.

 

[Starship Coyote]

I never said that. What I said was in essence "Every time you point a finger at someone, you point three back at yourself." i'm not concerned about anything. The perp that did that died three years ago and I got a rather large settlement from the family in the end. Guess why? That's what happens when you prove defamation.

He must mention touching children with nearly every post. I'd say that's a pretty accurate portrayal of who is in the closet about it.

Yeah right.

 

[Starship Coyote]

BTW, killing the messenger on the AOC scandal by decrying FOX News isn't going to cut it. A quick Google search came up with these:

https://nlpc.org/2019/03/04/fec-com...-cortez-for-extensive-off-the-books-campaign/

https://ijr.com/conservative-group-files-fec-complaint-ocasio-cortez/

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...-diverting-campaign-cash-to-his-own-companies

https://www.syracuse.com/politics/2...accused-of-funneling-1m-in-fec-complaint.html

https://www.wibc.com/blogs/chicks-right/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-accused-campaign-finance-violations

That's just a few.

Of course, she's innocent until proven guilty.

 

[The Question]

That's what the fellaters of commie cock do, though. They appeal to emotion to override critical thinking, first of all. Secondly, they attack the source instead of the claim, appealing to the delusion that the mainstream media actually reports the news instead of pushing propaganda when we know that the mainstream media pushes propaganda.

In short, they fool themselves into thinking that the rest of us are as gullible as they are. That's what makes them "useful idiots."

 

[The Question]

 

[jack]

LOL at "she's going to jail" Like I said earlier in the thread Breitbart is shit for a source

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/fact...ak-campaign-finance-law/ar-BBUsxYh?li=BBnb7Kz

Ah but you can dream cant you? Sounds like a wet dream in your case.

 

[jack]

LOL at "she's going to jail" Like I said earlier in the thread Breitbart is shit for a source

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/fact...ak-campaign-finance-law/ar-BBUsxYh?li=BBnb7Kz

Ah but you can dream cant you? Sounds like a wet dream in your case.

 

[Starship Coyote]

"MSN" and "fact" do not belong in the same sentence.

 

[Starship Coyote]

You'd do anything to lick her ass, wouldn't you?

 

[Starship Coyote]

 

[Volpone]

I remember the last time someone mocked Breitbart as a source. The story was pointing out that police, to that point, were unable to find evidence that Jussie Smollet had been attacked. :/

 

[jack]

LOL anyone that thinks Breitbart is "news" displays their terrible ignorance about news.

 

[Volpone]

Someone who is pointed out to be wrong and doubles down anyway displays their terrible ignorance.