Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Bill Richardson, Under Investigation, Withdraws from Sec of Commerce

Ramen

Suck my Logic
Richardson withdraws as Commerce nominee

New Mexico governor cites pending investigation of business dealings

NBC News
updated 2:43 p.m. ET, Sun., Jan. 4, 2009

New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, tapped in December by President-elect Barack Obama to serve as secretary of Commerce, has withdrawn his name for the position, citing a pending investigation into a company that has done business with his state.

"Let me say unequivocally that I and my Administration have acted properly in all matters and that this investigation will bear out that fact," he said Sunday in a report by NBC News' Andrea Mitchell. "But I have concluded that the ongoing investigation also would have forced an untenable delay in the confirmation process."

A federal grand jury is investigating how a California company that contributed to Richardson's political activities won a New Mexico state contract worth more than $1 billion. Richardson said in a statement issued by the Obama transition office that the investigation could take weeks or months but expressed confidence it will show he and his administration acted properly.

Plans to continue as governor
Richardson said he plans to continue in his role as governor. "I appreciate the confidence President-elect Obama has shown in me, and value our friendship and working partnership. I told him that I am eager to serve in the future in any way he deems useful. And like all Americans, I pray for his success and the success of our beloved country."

The announcement came ahead of Obama's Monday meetings with congressional leaders on a massive economic recovery bill he wants lawmakers to pass quickly.

Obama said Sunday he accepted Richardson's decision to withdraw with 'deep regret.'

"Governor Richardson is an outstanding public servant and would have brought to the job of Commerce Secretary and our economic team great insights accumulated through an extraordinary career in federal and state office," Obama said.

Obama gave no indication whom he might name to replace Richardson as the nominee but said "we must move quickly to fill the void left by Governor Richardson's decision."

'Pay-to-play' dealings?
A person familiar with the proceedings has told The Associated Press that the grand jury is looking into possible "pay-to-play" dealings between CDR Financial Products and someone in a position to push the contract through with the state of New Mexico.

State documents show CDR was paid a total of $1.48 million in 2004 and 2005 for its work on a transportation program.

Richardson ran against Obama in the Democratic presidential primary, but withdrew after a poor showing in the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary. He later endorsed Obama in his primary campaign against Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, Obama's nominee for secretary of state.

He is one of the most prominent Hispanics in the Democratic Party, having served in Congress and as President Bill Clinton's ambassador to the United Nations and energy secretary. As governor, he has kept up an international profile with a specialty in dealing with rogue nations. Obama also considered him to be secretary of state.

CDR and its CEO, David Rubin, have contributed at least $110,000 to three political committees formed by Richardson, according to an AP review of campaign finance records.

The largest donation, $75,000, was made by CDR in June 2004 — a couple of months after the transportation financing arrangement won state approval — to a political committee that Richardson established before the Democratic National Convention that year.

Looks like chickens are coming home to roost. It is now reported that Hillary Clinton is also under similar circumstances for money that was accepted through Bill's "foundation."

Just as the phrase "military industrial complex" turned out to be used against its creators, will the phrase "culture of corruption" inevitably be attributed to the poltical supporters of this administration?
 
He was actually the least bad of the Democratic contenders in the primary. Certainly not brilliant or anything but good enough for a "B" rating by Cato.

We'll see how this one plays out, I guess. Good times for Obama though, I'm sure. ;)
 
He was actually the least bad of the Democratic contenders in the primary. Certainly not brilliant or anything but good enough for a "B" rating by Cato.

Yeah, he was my favorite of the bunch as well.


I'm gonna wait and see on this. Could just be he's doing the right thing.


We'll see how this one plays out, I guess. Good times for Obama though, I'm sure. ;)

He's been able to dodge the Blagobullet. I don't think this will be able to get through his iron bubble.
 
Another scandal for the Obama team?

:shock:

I think I might have to back off of my "No Democrat pres will ever be able to top the corruption addled eight years that were the Clinton administration" prediction.
 
Hmm... Does Obama's pre-Presidential real estate scandal trump Clinton's pre-Presidential real estate scandal? :S:
 
He's been able to dodge the Blagobullet. I don't think this will be able to get through his iron bubble.


You're probably right. The real question is - what will? He is from Illinois after all so there's bound to be plenty more shit in his closet.

More likely though, people will just one by one wake up and figure out that, you know, he won't be able to fix the economy in three months. Stuff will still suck in April and at some point the love affair will be over. :shrug:
 
Fuck the man is not even in office yet. I don't like him but seriously this doesn't bode well for him. Which is a good thing.
 
Wow.

We're at the tail end of what will probably go down as the most corrupt administration in US history, and you Kool-Aid drinkers are already going after an administration that isn't even an official administration yet.

Are you going to start crying for impeachment on inauguration day?
 
Show us the corruption of the Bush administration?

And I don't mean the personal belief held by you and other leftists that anyone who is a Republican is automatically corrupt.

Show us the actual proof. Then explain why the Democrats have done nothing with this proof.

Stop letting your hatred of Bush cloud your thinking.
 
I've been in this argument a thousand times so far and the common denominator is always the blind loyalty that Republicans show their candidate. So I'm not going to waste my time on listing shit again. We'll just suffice it to say that in true conservative fashion, the super wealthy have gotten wealthier under the Bush administration and everyone else is out in the cold. Except that this time, "out in the cold" isn't a metaphor. It's a very cold, hard reality.
 
blah blah blah blah....

once again no proof, no evidence is offered but yeah we are all supposed to accept the fact that Bush is the most corrupt President ever!!
 
I've been in this argument a thousand times so far and the common denominator is always the blind loyalty that Republicans show their candidate. So I'm not going to waste my time on listing shit again. We'll just suffice it to say that in true conservative fashion, the super wealthy have gotten wealthier under the Bush administration and everyone else is out in the cold. Except that this time, "out in the cold" isn't a metaphor. It's a very cold, hard reality.

You know, the "super wealthy" probably lost more than most other people over the last year and a half. Something to the tune of 40% over the last year alone for most of them, I'd guess.
 
blah blah blah blah....

once again no proof, no evidence is offered but yeah we are all supposed to accept the fact that Bush is the most corrupt President ever!!

You cannot expect much from Sarek. He loses arguments when he returns items to the store with a receipt.
 
You know, the "super wealthy" probably lost more than most other people over the last year and a half. Something to the tune of 40% over the last year alone for most of them, I'd guess.

And that's about what it is. A guess.

Sorry, but 40% of a super fortune is still a super fortune. While most people are struggling over whether to put gas in the car or food on the table, I can't find it in myself to feel sorry for the ones that can't decide between granite over marble counter tops for the bathrooms in their mega yachts or settle for the winter in Afton over the Swiss alps. Or, like Bush, whether he should spend the night at his multimillion dollar ranch in Crawford or his multimillion dollar home in Dallas.
 
Funny that...

For a second I thought the leftist would offer some proof but then I just realized it is the usual leftist spiel.....
 
We'll just ignore the crashing economy, the record foreclosures in the US and the fact that Bush buying a new mansion was all over the news last week. The right can't handle that type of proof. It puts a dent in their chants of denial.
 
Why do you suck so bad, Sark? Were you born retarded or did you get hit on the head with something at some point in your life?
 
And that's about what it is. A guess.

Sorry, but 40% of a super fortune is still a super fortune. While most people are struggling over whether to put gas in the car or food on the table, I can't find it in myself to feel sorry for the ones that can't decide between granite over marble counter tops for the bathrooms in their mega yachts or settle for the winter in Afton over the Swiss alps. Or, like Bush, whether he should spend the night at his multimillion dollar ranch in Crawford or his multimillion dollar home in Dallas.


Do you even read what your typing?


Upthread you said that the rich got richer. When pointed out the reality of the crash, you respond with "well they're still rich!"

:wtf:
 
Top