Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Child Welfare Trumps Parental Rights

God's Afro

New member
UPPER MARLBORO, Md. (AP) - Scores of grumbling parents facing a threat of jail lined up at a courthouse Saturday to either prove that their school-age kids already had their required vaccinations or see that the youngsters submitted to the needle.

The get-tough policy in the Washington suburbs of Prince George's County was one of the strongest efforts made by any U.S. school system to ensure its youngsters receive their required immunizations.

Two months into the school year, school officials realized that more than 2,000 students in the county still didn't have the vaccinations they were supposed to have before attending class.

So Circuit Court Judge C. Philip Nichols ordered parents in a letter to appear at the courthouse Saturday and either get their children vaccinated on the spot or risk up to 10 days in jail. They could also provide proof of vaccination or an explanation why their kids didn't have them.

By about 8:30 a.m., the line of parents stretched outside the courthouse in the county on the east side of Washington.

Many of them complained that their children already were properly immunized but the school system had misplaced the records. They said efforts to get the paperwork straightened out had been futile.

"It was very intimidating," Territa Wooden of Largo said of the letter. She said she presented the paperwork at the courthouse Saturday and resolved the matter.

"I could be home asleep. My son had his shots," said Veinell Dickens of Upper Marlboro, who also blamed errant paperwork.

Aloma Martin of Fort Washington brought her children, Delontay and Taron, in 10th and 6th grade, for their hepatitis shots. She said she had been trying to get the vaccinations for more than a month, since the school system sent a warning letter. She had an appointment for Monday, but came to the courthouse to be safe.

"It was very heavy handed," she said of the county's action. "From that letter, it sounded like they were going to start putting us in jail."

School officials deemed the court action a success. School system spokesman John White said the number of children lacking vaccinations dropped from 2,300 at the time the judge sent the letter to about 1,100 Friday.

After Saturday's session, 172 more students were brought into compliance, including 101 students who received vaccinations at the courthouse and 71 whose records were updated.

That still left more than 900 students out of compliance with vaccination requirements, White said.

"Obviously, we still have some more work to do," he said.

Any children who still lack immunizations could be expelled. Their parents could then be brought up on truancy charges, which can result in a 10-day jail sentence for a first offense and 30 days for a second.

Prince George's State's Attorney Glenn Ivey couldn't say Saturday whether he would prosecute parents who fail to comply.

"We have to sit down with school and health services," he said. "We haven't ruled anything out. We need to figure out where we stand."

White said the school system, with about 132,000 students, has been trying for two years to get parents to comply with state law. That law allows children to skip vaccines if they have a medical or religious exemption. It was unclear how many medical or religious exemptions were involved.

Maryland, like all states, requires children to be immunized against several childhood illnesses including polio, mumps and measles. In recent years, it also has required that students up to high school age be vaccinated against hepatitis B and chicken pox.

Nichols said nobody actually came before him Saturday, but he was there if any parent asked to see him.

The judge noted the unhappy looks of some of the kids in line waiting for vaccinations. "It's cute. It looks like their parents are dragging them to church," Nichols said.

http://www.mndaily.com/articles/2007/11/19/72164607

Pro-lifers of course will whine that this trumps parental rights but they themselves are advocates of child welfare trumping parental rights? Why/ Because outlawing abortion effectively states that the welfare of the child trumps parental rights because children can't consent.

And that philosophy shouldn't end upon birth.

Children should be protected at all ages because there is no moral difference between a life that hasn't been born yet and one that has been born. Children really can not consent whether they're born or not.

So being born makes no difference because the child cannot consent and therefore must be protected from harm.

SO SAY WE ALL!
 
I remember some stories a few years back where some kid needed an operation to save their life and the parents refused to let him have it and decided to heal them through prayer.
 
^That was John Travolta's kid.

You have no idea how many vaccinations kids need and how often it changes until you're in charge of doing it. Of course my neglectful ex sister-in-law never took my niece and nephew for their regular check-ups so they were behind on their vaccinations when I took them for a check-up over the summer. My ex sister-in-law's mother and sister couldn't believe that the school hadn't notified her that their vaccinations weren't up to date. Well A) who says they didn't? If she wasn't going to bother taking care of it on the front end what's to say she'd do just because the school called? And B) like the school has time to make sure I'm not being a shitot parent. How ridiculous to believe that it's the school's responsibility to keep track of your child's health. God, no wonder schools think they know what's better for your children than you do.
 
I see nothing wrong with situatation. The scenario merely captializes on the parents who, in their stubroness or in some cases, their stinginess, would not commit to the simple act of getting their children immunizations.

I think this is just a show that the government states things of what it means and, if nobody complies, it will enforce its regulations. Noting the childrens looks, its obvious they're not going to be happy

Hell, I still am unhappy to go to the dentist, but its a necessary evil. However, I DO think 10 days or, the alternative, 30 days is a bit too harsh. They haven't thought of the question of "who will take care of the children." However, seeing as this was made in an attempt to 'crack down' I don't believe things will go this far

Parents in this day in age should be more responsible. Its not like its going to cost the amount of buying a car so, an immunization should not be dodged for any reason. These parents are going to be raising our future but the first thing they should learn is a little responsibility.

On account of the school losing records, I don't think that's the case. Yes I can believe 10 people have their records unaccounted for, these things happen, even with coputers. But, 2,000 parents is just impropable so I know its just these 'responsible' adults making up 'child-like' excuses. Like how a kid might blame a teacher of losing his homework when he already knows he did not turn it in.
 
God's Afro said:
Pro-lifers of course will whine that this trumps parental rights but they themselves are advocates of child welfare trumping parental rights? Why/ Because outlawing abortion effectively states that the welfare of the child trumps parental rights because children can't consent.

And that philosophy shouldn't end upon birth.

Children should be protected at all ages because there is no moral difference between a life that hasn't been born yet and one that has been born. Children really can not consent whether they're born or not.

So being born makes no difference because the child cannot consent and therefore must be protected from harm.

SO SAY WE ALL!

Do you know anything about vaccinations at all?
 
Top