Weird, socially awkward, anxiety ridden,sexually inexperienced dork, who likes to crossdress, and has an an immature, gross, inappropriate, sense of humor. Smarter than he lets on or thinks he is.
Enraged. incandescent
- Thread starter Jaster
- Start date
The Question
Eternal
USUC
Trollzilla
America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS), a group that has spread disinformation about vaccines and the COVID-19 pandemic, is suing the Pentagon to stop its vaccine mandate.
Lt. Col. Theresa M. Long, who serves as the brigade surgeon for the Army's 1st Aviation Brigade, falsely wrote in an affidavit last week that the Pfizer vaccine is made of antifreeze.
Lt. Col. Theresa M. Long, who serves as the brigade surgeon for the Army's 1st Aviation Brigade, falsely wrote in an affidavit last week that the Pfizer vaccine is made of antifreeze.
USUC
Trollzilla
Lt. Col. Theresa M. Long, who serves as the brigade surgeon for the Army’s 1st Aviation Brigade, filed an affidavit late last week in support of the suit’s motion to block the vaccine mandate, arguing against the requirement based in part on her (false) belief that “all persons who have received a Covid 19 Vaccine are damaged in their cardiovascular system in an irreparable and irrevocable manner.”
The Question
Eternal
I'd like to see that affidavit, so that I can confirm that that's what she alleged. Do you have a link to it? If not, where did you read it? Or -- and I hope for the sake of your reputation that this is not the case -- are you only repeating hearsay about the document?
The Question
Eternal
Right, so -- being curious about said affidavit -- I found it myself.
Read here.
Lt. Col. Long did not, in point of fact, write in this affidavit that the Pfizer vaccine is, "made of antifreeze."
Per Page 4, Item 25, she wrote the following:
Alleging that PEG is an ingredient in common between the Pfizer vaccine and antifreeze is not the same thing as saying that, "the vaccine is made of antifreeze." Propylene glycol is also an ingredient in antifreeze. It's also an ingredient in skin care products, as well as being a common food additive. The ingredient is not the same thing as the product which contains it. However, propylene glycol is non-toxic to humans. Polyethylene glycol is not.
To the point: can you cite supporting evidence that Pfizer's vaccine excludes the ingredient Polyethylene Glycol? If not, then you're simply mischaracterizing what Lt. Col. Long wrote in her affidavit.
Why do that?
If you have no empirical basis on which to contest what she's alleging, then on what basis are you contesting it? You throw in a lot of 'falsely's -- but on what evidence do you declare her allegations to be false? She's a physician -- are you?
Your "trust the science" stance seems awfully biased -- toward the narrative that will net government and corporations more money and more power over our lives. I thought you were smart enough to know better than that.
Apparently, my estimation of you was far too generous.
Read here.
Lt. Col. Long did not, in point of fact, write in this affidavit that the Pfizer vaccine is, "made of antifreeze."
Per Page 4, Item 25, she wrote the following:
Lt. Col. Theresa M. Long said:
Alleging that PEG is an ingredient in common between the Pfizer vaccine and antifreeze is not the same thing as saying that, "the vaccine is made of antifreeze." Propylene glycol is also an ingredient in antifreeze. It's also an ingredient in skin care products, as well as being a common food additive. The ingredient is not the same thing as the product which contains it. However, propylene glycol is non-toxic to humans. Polyethylene glycol is not.
To the point: can you cite supporting evidence that Pfizer's vaccine excludes the ingredient Polyethylene Glycol? If not, then you're simply mischaracterizing what Lt. Col. Long wrote in her affidavit.
Why do that?
If you have no empirical basis on which to contest what she's alleging, then on what basis are you contesting it? You throw in a lot of 'falsely's -- but on what evidence do you declare her allegations to be false? She's a physician -- are you?
Your "trust the science" stance seems awfully biased -- toward the narrative that will net government and corporations more money and more power over our lives. I thought you were smart enough to know better than that.
Apparently, my estimation of you was far too generous.
Last edited:
USUC
Trollzilla
“Radiator antifreeze includes either ethylene glycol, which is toxic to humans, or propylene glycol, a compound that is much less toxic and even considered safe in certain amounts. Some foods, medications and cosmetics contain propylene glycol”.
Any way you look at her attempt to make some direct, alarmist connection between the vaccine and antifreeze was hype.
Any way you look at her attempt to make some direct, alarmist connection between the vaccine and antifreeze was hype.
The Question
Eternal
As much "hype" as mischaracterizing her allegation as being that the vaccine is, "made of antifreeze", which is clearly not what she alleged?
USUC
Trollzilla
STFU. I just copied this from the statement you posted from her.
25. Other journals and scientific papers also denote that this particular ingredient has never been used in humans before.4 To be abundantly clear, one of the listed primary ingredients of these injectables is Polyethylene glycol (“PEG”) which is a derivative of ethylene oxide. Polyethylene Glycol is the active ingredient in antifreeze. While it is hard to believe this is a key ingredient in these vaccines, it would explain the increased cardiovascular risk to users of the BioNTech or Comirnaty shots. I cannot discern what form of alchemy Pfizer and the FDA have discovered that would make antifreeze into a healthful cure to the human body.
Fucking moron.
25. Other journals and scientific papers also denote that this particular ingredient has never been used in humans before.4 To be abundantly clear, one of the listed primary ingredients of these injectables is Polyethylene glycol (“PEG”) which is a derivative of ethylene oxide. Polyethylene Glycol is the active ingredient in antifreeze. While it is hard to believe this is a key ingredient in these vaccines, it would explain the increased cardiovascular risk to users of the BioNTech or Comirnaty shots. I cannot discern what form of alchemy Pfizer and the FDA have discovered that would make antifreeze into a healthful cure to the human body.
Fucking moron.
The Question
Eternal
You put those goalposts right back where you found them, young lady. Because that's the first time you've used "antifreeze ingredients" in relation to what she alleges. Shall I remind you of your exact previous term?
Maybe you thought I'd miss the switchup where you concede that she did not, in fact, "falsely" or otherwise write that the vaccine is "made of antifreeze" by quietly changing your claim to say that she wrote that the vaccine is "made with antifreeze ingredients."
I did spot your change in terminology, though. Did you really think you're slick enough to pull that off?
USUC
Trollzilla
Oh puleeze. Splitting nose hairs. She said she couldn’t understand.”…antifreeze into a healthful cure…”. Keep back pedaling though. It’s amusing.
The Question
Eternal
Yeah, no. That's what we call reading comprehension. If you're not going to bother keeping track of the words you're posting, you can do yourself and the rest of us a favor by not posting any. Put more succinctly: Be accurate or be silent. Capisce?
USUC
Trollzilla
I think they coined the term “gaslighting” just for people like you.
You conveniently ignored (dodged) that the statement above is/was false (ergo the Drs. argument is bullshit-as are your attempts to stay afloat in her shit any which way you can). But keep flailing about looking for anything to hang onto in the septic tank. As I said, it’s amusing.
The Question
Eternal
Mmhmm. Presumably, then, you have access to a comprehensive list of the constituent compounds in the vaccine she's talking about?
If you do, I'd like a link to that list.
If you don't, you have no ground on which to call her allegation false.
And, as an interesting aside, in case you're calling her allegations false just because Pfizer denies them:
Did you know that the manufacturer of Chantix/Champix spent 15 years denying that that product was harmful... before finally recalling it? Guess who the manufacturer of Chantix was.
Go ahead. Guess.
Now, there's a simple way, in any situation, to know who's lying.
People lie for one of two reasons: To gain something that the truth would not enable them to gain, or to keep something that the truth would cause them to lose.
What does Pfizer lose if their vaccine contains polyethylene glycol? Maybe nothing. On the other hand, maybe it prevents them from gaining more money as a result of more vaccinations, since people will continue to resist vaccination.
What does Lt. Col. Long gain from lying about the vaccine? Is anybody going to reward her for lying about it? No.
She gains nothing.
Pfizer has a tangible motive to lie; moreover, Pfizer has a track record of lying. Long has neither.
Last question for now: Would you put as much faith in Exxon or in Colt as you're putting in Pfizer? If not, why are you being so damned charitable to a corporation that's easily as predatory as the other two?
Last edited:
USUC
Trollzilla
Ha! I’m pointing out your errors (and I’m not going to re-read her affidavit but presumably you were referring to what she said). You said polyethylene glycol is NOT non toxic to humans. It’s used in laxatives and other medical products. Granted if you want to chug a gallon of Miralax and test it’s toxicity that way by all means, go ahead. But that would just make it toxic to stupid. Too much water is toxic to stupid.
The Question
Eternal
Okay.
Of course...
A cautionary note: Toxicity of polyethylene glycol 200 injected intraperitoneally into mice - PubMed
The parenteral administration of hydrophobic substances in vivo requires the use of organic solvents to ensure sufficient solubility and avoid precipitation. Dimethyl sulfoxide is commonly used for this purpose. Based on the common assumption that polyethylene glycol (PEG) is non-toxic, our...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Medical science disagrees with you. Trust the science, right? Or is that only "the science that agrees with corporate profits"?
The following list outlines which FDA vaccine advisory committee board members are compromised and how:
• Acting Chair Arnold S. Monto was a paid consultant at Pfizer as recently as 2018.
• Steve Pergam received the Pfizer “vaccine” and was featured getting and promoting it by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle.
• Committee member Archana Chatterjee worked on a research project involving vaccines for infants that took place from 2018-2020 and was sponsored by Pfizer.
• Myron Levine has mentored numerous U.S. post-doctoral fellows, and one of his proteges is Raphael Simon, Pfizer’s senior director of vaccine research and development.
• James Hildreth, a temporary voting member, made a financial interest disclosure stating that he accepted $1.5 million while serving as president at Meharry Medical College, which administers Pfizer’s covid injections.
• Geeta K. Swamy chairs the “Independent Data Monitoring Committee for the Pfizer Group B Streptococcus Vaccine Program,” which is sponsored by Pfizer. Swamy was also listed by Duke University as “a co-investigator for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trial.”
• Gregg Sylvester used to work as vice president at Pfizer Vaccines where he launched numerous vaccines for the company, including one for children.
Several other “temporary voting members,” including Ofer Levy of Boston Children’s Hospital, Eric Rubin, Jay Portnoy and Melinda Wharton, are all outspoken in their support for injecting children with Pfizer’s covid jabs.
The FDA’s vaccine advisory committee has never really been trustworthy or legitimate. It has pretty much always functioned as a rubber stamp for Big Pharma, approving and pushing all of the latest drugs, both pill and injections, on Americans.
“FDA advisory committee members in the past have frequently been the target of heavy politicking by industry representatives of whatever drug they were considering for a recommendation at in-person meetings,” reported FDANews back in December.
“That process has been somewhat altered by the fact that during COVID-19, meetings are being held virtually. But it’s likely that behind-the-scenes pressuring still goes on. The industry defends the attempts to influence committee members as simply efforts to best present their case.”
It is now an undeniable fact that the FDA cannot be trusted. Since it is run by the pharmaceutical industry, this fake federal agency is always going to push whatever brings in the profits, which in this case include Pfizer’s “Operation Warp Speed” injections.
More related news about the corrupt FDA can be found