SaintLucifer said:
Ah but I am CANADIAN long before I am British. I love my country CANADA. To me Britain is a far-off land from which my parents emigrated to Canada. I retain much of its culture although I was born in Canada and shall always be Canadian. My heart is as red as our beloved maple leaf.
There is nothing wrong with nationalism. There were no greater nationalists than the British and you know it. They adopted Imperialism for economic reasons. Nothing more. None were more passionate abou their identity than the British.
I 'rile up'? You obviously do not read my posts. You suggest since I post what many consider 'thesis' posts I cannot argue a simple point. My 'thesis' posts take another person's argument, examine its validity and point out its weaknesses. Then within the same post I correct that argument. Naturally it would be long. The reason everyone else has such short posts would simply be due to the fact they are incapable of thinking beyond 20 words whilst I could write a novel on any subject. That would make me SUPERIOR, not inferior as you so mistakenly claim.
The other reason I am capable of making my posts so long would be thanks to my typing speed. I will not be faulted for that.
Flag waving nationalism is the lowest form of mob politics, and most certainly does not belong in British Politics; rationality, detachment and logic are the hallmarks of the British approach. British Nationalism, as you would define it, would mean we were all Germans with a German approach to the idea of the nation. However we are far more removed from such petty, emotionally driven drivel that ultimately results in Barbarism.
You're not even Academically trained, and it is obvious from your 'style' (if I may be permitted to call it so) that you're a self-taught 'know-it-all', much like that nasty little oik Hitler... another German incidentally! Why did Britain start the Second World War? Because Hitler didn't go to Oxford; Poland didn't even come into it.
Since you lack the academic credentials to be taken seriously, let us now turn to an even bolder claim on your behalf: the alleged ability to write a novel on any subject. I would first tackle this issue by declaring the truth on the subject of novels, that they are mostly read by girls and written by queers. Men of character have no time for a novel, since they are nothing more than a silly collection of descriptions for events, peoples & places that do not exist.
Superiority is not a matter of socialist mass ideals, but on a higher elevated concept which a mediocrity such as you is incapable of understanding. What luck for the ruling classes that people such as you never make it to Whitehall! And logic are the hallmarks of the British approach. British Nationalism, as you would define it, would mean we were all Germans with a German approach to the idea of the nation. However we are far more removed from such petty, emotionally driven drivel that ultimately results in Barbarism.
You're not even academically trained, and it is obvious from your 'style' (if I may be permitted to call it so) that you're a self-taught 'know-it-all', much like that nasty little oik Hitler... another German incidentally! Why did Britain start the Second World War? Because Hitler didn't go to Oxford; Poland didn't even come into it.
Since you lack the academic credentials to be taken seriously, let us now turn to an even bolder claim on your behalf: the alleged ability to write a novel on any subject. I would first tackle this issue by declaring the truth on the subject of novels, that they are mostly read by girls and written by queers. Men of character have no time for a novel, since they are nothing more than a silly collection of descriptions for events, peoples & places that do not exist.
Superiority is not a matter of socialist mass ideals, but on a higher elevated concept which a mediocrity such as yourself is incapable of understanding. What luck for the ruling classes that people such as yourself never make it to Whitehall!
