Menu
What's new
Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Ft. Hood shooter: Malik Nadal Hasan

Consumer

Consumer

Elder Statesman
I think we should start profiling. Now.

We can stop when the people we "profile" stop turning out to be the people killing the rest of us 95% of the time.
 
The shooter is most likely a Muslim immigrant or son of Moslem immigrants. No duh!

Or a black racist supremacist pseudomuslim like Farrakhan.

Either 1 wouldn't shock me in the least.
 
He's from Jordan.

And a psychiatrist.

It's getting bad when the headshrinks start going postal.

Funny you said 95% of the time. That's the percentage of interracial crimes in the US committed by niggers. Of so the DOJ says. Profiling them certainly proved profitable. Didn't it?
 
Islam... the religon of Peace ... declare it self innocint from this.

Brother Malik was bad treated by army bc of he Muslim. its AMERICA's fault.
 
Item 1: If he's awake, discuss his friends and contacts in detail and then drop him into a wood-chipper, feet first.

Item 2: A propensity toward extremism is not exclusive to any religion. It just so happens that our (the US's) enemies are Muslim right now. We did NOT give security clearances to confessed Communists during the Cold War, or let them enlist in the military at all. Why should this be different?
 
Guilt by association isn't and has never been a valid reason for doing things in this country. Otherwise, we'd have to start randomly stripping down unshaven libertarians in the street at random to make sure they weren't carrying any dangerous manifestos or plans for package bombs, and, frankly, I'd miss Conchaga.

Even disregarding the fact that political affiliations are nothing like religious affiliations, our profiling of "communists" during the Cold War basically became an excuse to play morality police that didn't even end up keeping the Soviets' dirty fingers out of our state secrets.
 
FBI parte due said:
Guilt by association isn't and has never been a valid reason for doing things in this country. Otherwise, we'd have to start randomly stripping down unshaven libertarians in the street at random to make sure they weren't carrying any dangerous manifestos or plans for package bombs, and, frankly, I'd miss Conchaga.

Even disregarding the fact that political affiliations are nothing like religious affiliations, our profiling of "communists" during the Cold War basically became an excuse to play morality police that didn't even end up keeping the Soviets' dirty fingers out of our state secrets.
Click to expand...

I'm a registered Libertarian.

I'd be a LOT less touchy about the government trying to "protect" me if I could easily carry a gun, then the problem would be a very short-lived one if someone started shooting.
 
"Archibald Nixon: Only if you're a halfway decent shot"

That is why God delivered unto his Chosen one's the Drum magazine and the banana clip.
 
You think I don't know that Christians flip out and kill people? I was being sarcastic.
 
and i just used it as an opportunity to pass my vast serial killer knowledge, u were just a implement in my selfish obsession,



soz :menty:
 
Consumer said:
"Archibald Nixon: Only if you're a halfway decent shot"

That is why God delivered unto his Chosen one's the Drum magazine and the banana clip.
Click to expand...

Of course: kill 'em all & let Him sort 'em out...just like the tattoo sez!

Also, quite the carry. Not something you could stuff under your belt --unless you're into that sort of thing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top