Menu
What's new
Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

I guess WF still misses me.

The Question

The Question

Eternal
Gargamet said:
Quest said:
Alt-right can be useful term, if used to indicate people with right-wing ideology who have rejected traditional conservative values such as common courtesy and basic decency. However, I agree that its meaning has become rather muddled of late. I use the term "redpill" very deliberately, not intending to be derogatory, as that is how adherents of the movement refer to themselves. I do find it ironic that "taking the red pill" pretty much means adopting the same old worn out beliefs that have been around forever, but framing them in the language of victimhood. "Whites are the real victims of racism. Men are the real victims of sexism." If rejecting those precepts makes me an SJW, so be it.
nAEtCAl.gif
Click to expand...

Emphasis mine. Q.v. John Castle.
Click to expand...

I guess they missed me. But at least they knew who would have called them out on being completely wrong.

You see, the pendulums on racism and sexism -- even institutionalized racism and sexism -- have in fact swung to the point where racism against whites is at best excused and at worst legitimized, and the same is true with sexism against men. There are mountains of evidence of both, and the only rebuttal the left has for that is to fundamentally redefine the words 'sexism' and 'racism' to talk about systems rather than dynamics.

But considering the anti-male sexism inherent in the court system and the anti-white racism inherent in employment and college admissions, even those redefinitions fail.

(Now, gargamet certainly knew I'd shred that bullshit in exactly the fashion I just did, which is why she took advantage of me not being there to invoke my name in association with it. Like any coward, she wanted a free shot at me. It must be hard to be so feeble that you can only win a fight when the opponent is absent.)
 
Haven't been paying them much attention. I just bounce in and out now and then to see if they're taking their Lord's name in vain. :naughty:
 
The Saint said:
I guess they missed me. But at least they knew who would have called them out on being completely wrong.

You see, the pendulums on racism and sexism -- even institutionalized racism and sexism -- have in fact swung to the point where racism against whites is at best excused and at worst legitimized, and the same is true with sexism against men. There are mountains of evidence of both, and the only rebuttal the left has for that is to fundamentally redefine the words 'sexism' and 'racism' to talk about systems rather than dynamics.

But considering the anti-male sexism inherent in the court system and the anti-white racism inherent in employment and college admissions, even those redefinitions fail.

(Now, gargamet certainly knew I'd shred that bullshit in exactly the fashion I just did, which is why she took advantage of me not being there to invoke my name in association with it. Like any coward, she wanted a free shot at me. It must be hard to be so feeble that you can only win a fight when the opponent is absent.)
Click to expand...
Derp
 
Speaking of which, I have a theory: Progressive academics would rather get their way and fail than succeed if it means having to admit they were wrong. See, there are plenty of ways to explain it away if you fail: It was an impossible situation and your policies actually managed to prolong things for much longer. Your policies would have worked, but you just didn't go *far* enough. Your policies would have worked, if only they hadn't been sabotaged by those eeeevil Capitalist pig-dogs. It wasn't actual socialism, you were really just a thug-tin-pot dictator (WHOOPS! Can't use that one!) But the point is, if we do things your way and it fails, then it wasn't the fault of the system; you were right, you were just a victim of circumstances beyond your control. If we do things a different way and it succeeds, they yes, you were pretty much wrong. :bergman:
 
"You have been banned for the following reason: Posting racist images directed at a specific poster.. Your ban will be lifted on Aug 26, 2017."

That was for saying Anna was a histrionic boog.
 
Last edited:
I thought I'd heard all the slurs there were, but 'boog' is a new one to me. And oh, noez! You called her a mean word? You absolute villain, you!

Hey, remember when Wordforge wasn't TrekBBS? For that matter, remember when this whole fucking country wasn't TrekBBS?
 
I wouldn't know about TrekBBS. The last time I went there, the site raised hell at me for using an adblocker.

Of course, that's old news there. I remember when Christian was banning people who even talked about ad blockers.
 
The big genesis of WF, supposedly, was that TrekBBS had gotten too PC and ban-happy, but they wanted a play a shade more serious than TK to discuss things. Over time, of course, it turns out that all they really wanted was to be the ones playing hall monitor themselves instead of getting it played at them.
 
I must admit I still use the Blue Room there because I don't have a regular bartender and I don't believe in pyschotherapists, but that's it. Currently I've got a GTurner avatar, but I'm tempted to change it to a Confederate statue so see of that is afoul of the Thought Police.
 
I had around ten accounts there all banned by over zealous mods never went back
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top