Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

I SAW KING KONG - I WAS SHOCKED

Jaster

I came for the porn
Peter Jackson of Lord of the Rings fame has remade King Kong.

I saw this film.

I cried after seeing this film.

I have no hatred for Peter Jackson or his team of amazing folks. What this person... hates...… cannot stand and thinks should be relegated to the same dark, murky hole in Hades that hopefully holds the entire body of black-face entertainment is the story.

King Kong, which was made famous as a 1930’s film, is the story of a white, very white...extremely white and Aryan the way Ann Coulter wishes she was Aryan...woman who some how ends up on a tropical, very tropical, WILD and untamed island populated by…NATIVES! Yep, natives who become entranced with this Aryan representation of civilized female beauty even though they have never set eyes on a white woman. Depending on the version, they either have always worshiped white women or simply begin to worship them once they set eyes on the blond bombshell that plops down on their island.

Now, they have a secret. A big f******* secret! There is a giant highly sexualized primate lurking on the island! Oh no! Jesus, why would a loving Gawd ever create such a beast? In the words of Wolf Blitzer…he’s so black!

In order to pacify said giant black primate, the natives offer up sacrificial women. The giant primate then takes the women and leaves the natives alone for a while. ‘Cause…well, you know…he's getting his freak on. And everyone knows that giant sexualized primates are soothed and calmed by the company of a terrified nubile woman.

Even though the regular offering of native women has pacified the giant primate, the natives know that this stunning white woman will put his ass over the top. S***, they started coveting her right from the start! No way is their giant highly sexualized primate going to turn down a tryst with an unwilling blond beauty.

So, they capture the girl, tie her ass to a stake and offer her.

The giant primate, who represents society’s notion that black men are obsessed with white women and are driven into uncontrollable frenzies by them, comes upon the blond and…well…becomes obsessed with her and is driven into an uncontrollable frenzy.

It gets better!

The blond, at first disgusted and terrified by the giant black primate, begins to fall under its spell. This is vital, because EVERYONE knows that the black man…oh, sh**…no that would be the 'giant black primate' has skills and, given enough time, can seduce pure untouched blonds with his sexual prowess!

Lets see...ummm...oh yes...blond is freed, primate is captured, marketing blitz hits New York, blond feels sorry for primate, primate is obsessing over blond, primate gets loose…city is terrorized, blond is kidnapped by obsessed primate, they get to the Empire State building and somehow the primate gets to the top. Makes sense since we’re talking about a GIANT primate who just has to be used to climbing tall buildings and sh** like that. Anyhoo… the primate, with blond in hand, is shot and falls to the bottom. Terrorized blond cries and primate dies with one...

large...

extremely large and black...

...f****** GIANT and BLAAAAAACK hand reaching out towards said virginal blond symbol of white pure beauty.

Sigh.

Yeah, a modern civilised well educated person f****** hates this story. My ass knows that Hollywood can’t and/or won’t get its sh** together regarding portrayals of them minorities. But f******* this f****** ****!

F******* everyone involved in bringing this historic insult back to the screen…to insult the f******** **** out of me again! F*********!

WAKE UP!.. WAKE UP..... it's the 21st f******** century !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And as far as the portrayal of women…oh sh**, that requires another post. Suffice it to say, King Kong is a revival of the pedestal and blondie sits right on top of it. Virginal, untouched, coveted…she is the ultimate possession…a literal theatrical attraction.

Between the portrayal of women and the resurrection of antiquated racial stereotypes, this self aware person can find little good in the King Kong story. Which means that this remake will join the other blockbuster films of 2005 on the worst films of all time list.

WAKE UP! WAKE UP! ITS THE 21 ST CENTURY.RIGHT?
 
I loved the film. Jackson's a genius. That's right a fucking genius. Like Shakespeare, or Beethoven, or Van Gagh.

DON'T YOU DARE CRITICIZE HIS WORK!

Meet The Feebles was one of the best horror films ever made. So was The Frighteners and Brain Damage and that other film he did with that bitch from titanic that plays a coming of age lipstick lesbian that slaughters her mother like a pig when she tries to break up her little fishing expedition.

Jackson's a fucking artist, thats's right a fucking artist! He's sensitive to shit. He throws up before he gets behind the camera HE CAN MAKE CELLULOID SPEAK!

I'm sure if he could be a fisherman he would but he CANT BECAUSE HE'S A FUCKING GENIUS!

You think Paul was actually the Walrus, rght? HAHAHAHAHA JOHN WAS THE WALRUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THAT'S RIGHT IT WAS JOHN! While it's true that John was leaving clues in he music that Paul was the Walrus, he was actually just saying that to be nice, BUT LENNON WAS ALWAYS ACTUALLY THE WALRUS.

Hear all that shit Paul's been singing? EASTMAN WAS A FUCKING ANIMAL! A FUCKING STUPID MIDDLE CLASS PIG! John would never let fucking animals like that near him.

I'll tell you why no one ever liked Yoko's music. BECAUSE SHE'S A WOMAN AND SHE'S A FUCKING CHINK THAT'S WHY!
 
If anyone rents the dvd go right to the last 50 minutes , thats the olny part thats worth a damn.

BTW kong dies in the end. LOL
 
"olny part"??

You're all really retards, and this is typing practice for you right?
 
^Then you've been stoned every time you've posted here or at TW?

Cos I don't see much of a difference between stoned you and straight you.
 
Trollwars Stupid dog means people at his middle school threw rocks at him again today.

Bastards. It wouldn't be so bad if it was only the other students.

Just wait till his homies Trollwarseminem, TrollwarsPdiddy, and TrollwarsFittycent get here. There we're talking pwnage Wigger style!!!!Crazy Dawg Shout out to Tha Suburbs, Yo.
 
Jaster said:
Peter Jackson of Lord of the Rings fame has remade King Kong.

I saw this film.

I cried after seeing this film.

I have no hatred for Peter Jackson or his team of amazing folks. What this person... hates...… cannot stand and thinks should be relegated to the same dark, murky hole in Hades that hopefully holds the entire body of black-face entertainment is the story.

King Kong, which was made famous as a 1930’s film, is the story of a white, very white...extremely white and Aryan the way Ann Coulter wishes she was Aryan...woman who some how ends up on a tropical, very tropical, WILD and untamed island populated by…NATIVES! Yep, natives who become entranced with this Aryan representation of civilized female beauty even though they have never set eyes on a white woman. Depending on the version, they either have always worshiped white women or simply begin to worship them once they set eyes on the blond bombshell that plops down on their island.

Now, they have a secret. A big f******* secret! There is a giant highly sexualized primate lurking on the island! Oh no! Jesus, why would a loving Gawd ever create such a beast? In the words of Wolf Blitzer…he’s so black!

In order to pacify said giant black primate, the natives offer up sacrificial women. The giant primate then takes the women and leaves the natives alone for a while. ‘Cause…well, you know…he's getting his freak on. And everyone knows that giant sexualized primates are soothed and calmed by the company of a terrified nubile woman.

Even though the regular offering of native women has pacified the giant primate, the natives know that this stunning white woman will put his ass over the top. S***, they started coveting her right from the start! No way is their giant highly sexualized primate going to turn down a tryst with an unwilling blond beauty.

So, they capture the girl, tie her ass to a stake and offer her.

The giant primate, who represents society’s notion that black men are obsessed with white women and are driven into uncontrollable frenzies by them, comes upon the blond and…well…becomes obsessed with her and is driven into an uncontrollable frenzy.

It gets better!

The blond, at first disgusted and terrified by the giant black primate, begins to fall under its spell. This is vital, because EVERYONE knows that the black man…oh, sh**…no that would be the 'giant black primate' has skills and, given enough time, can seduce pure untouched blonds with his sexual prowess!

Lets see...ummm...oh yes...blond is freed, primate is captured, marketing blitz hits New York, blond feels sorry for primate, primate is obsessing over blond, primate gets loose…city is terrorized, blond is kidnapped by obsessed primate, they get to the Empire State building and somehow the primate gets to the top. Makes sense since we’re talking about a GIANT primate who just has to be used to climbing tall buildings and sh** like that. Anyhoo… the primate, with blond in hand, is shot and falls to the bottom. Terrorized blond cries and primate dies with one...

large...

extremely large and black...

...f****** GIANT and BLAAAAAACK hand reaching out towards said virginal blond symbol of white pure beauty.

Sigh.

Yeah, a modern civilised well educated person f****** hates this story. My ass knows that Hollywood can’t and/or won’t get its sh** together regarding portrayals of them minorities. But f******* this f****** ****!

F******* everyone involved in bringing this historic insult back to the screen…to insult the f******** **** out of me again! F*********!

WAKE UP!.. WAKE UP..... it's the 21st f******** century !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And as far as the portrayal of women…oh sh**, that requires another post. Suffice it to say, King Kong is a revival of the pedestal and blondie sits right on top of it. Virginal, untouched, coveted…she is the ultimate possession…a literal theatrical attraction.

Between the portrayal of women and the resurrection of antiquated racial stereotypes, this self aware person can find little good in the King Kong story. Which means that this remake will join the other blockbuster films of 2005 on the worst films of all time list.

WAKE UP! WAKE UP! ITS THE 21 ST CENTURY.RIGHT?


My dear child, when niggers first laid eyes upon the white Aryan blonde bombshell of a female, they believed it was an angel sent from God they were seeing. This is fact. Why do you think the niggers in South Africa are raping white, blue-eyed blonde females all over and in record numbers? To a nigger, our women are goddesses and you know it. When my grandfather took my parents throughout the Empire, it was normal for all natives to eyeball my aunt with lust - so much so that my grandfather upped the family and took off. No way was he going to allow the dirty native rapist scum anywhere near his daughter. You see? She was a perfect example of a white, blue-eyed blonde Aryan female. Whilst my grandfather and his family got off the boat in South Africa, the niggers gazed upon my aunt in complete and utter awe, as if they were looking upon GOD himself. After they stayed in South Africa for awhile, the niggers kept hanging around anywhere near my grandfather's daughter. My grandfather told me you could see it in their eyes, what would happen to his daughter if ever they were left alone with her. It seems many white families made certain no nigger ever gazed upon their white blue-eyed blonde daughters. Many Boers killed niggers just for looking at their daughters the wrong way as they well should have.

Odd that white males do not gaze upon nigger females in the same manner as nigger males gaze upon white, blue-eyed blonde Aryan females. Might I ask 'why?' Simple. Nigger females are uglier than sin. I guarantee when the white man saw the nigger female for the first time, he PUKED.

Nigger males are not the only people who gazed upon our white, blue-eyed blonde Aryan women with the intention of raping them as they were in such awe of their beauty, but the CHINKS and PAKIS did the very same. Let us not forget the natives of North America. Many, many such women were raped by the North American natives. They did not do this as part of 'war' or anything. They did it for a chance to possess what they believed was a bunch of Goddesses. The natives took one look at their own women, then at our women and said to their women 'fuck you, I am going to rape me a fucking white blue-eyed blonde Aryan bitch you stupid cunt. I am tired of comparing your ugly bug with such God-like beauty!'
 
SaintLucifer said:
My dear child, when niggers first laid eyes upon the white Aryan blonde bombshell of a female, they believed it was an angel sent from God they were seeing. This is fact. Why do you think the niggers in South Africa are raping white, blue-eyed blonde females all over and in record numbers? To a nigger, our women are goddesses and you know it. When my grandfather took my parents throughout the Empire, it was normal for all natives to eyeball my aunt with lust - so much so that my grandfather upped the family and took off. No way was he going to allow the dirty native rapist scum anywhere near his daughter. You see? She was a perfect example of a white, blue-eyed blonde Aryan female. Whilst my grandfather and his family got off the boat in South Africa, the niggers gazed upon my aunt in complete and utter awe, as if they were looking upon GOD himself. After they stayed in South Africa for awhile, the niggers kept hanging around anywhere near my grandfather's daughter. My grandfather told me you could see it in their eyes, what would happen to his daughter if ever they were left alone with her. It seems many white families made certain no nigger ever gazed upon their white blue-eyed blonde daughters. Many Boers killed niggers just for looking at their daughters the wrong way as they well should have.

Odd that white males do not gaze upon nigger females in the same manner as nigger males gaze upon white, blue-eyed blonde Aryan females. Might I ask 'why?' Simple. Nigger females are uglier than sin. I guarantee when the white man saw the nigger female for the first time, he PUKED.

Nigger males are not the only people who gazed upon our white, blue-eyed blonde Aryan women with the intention of raping them as they were in such awe of their beauty, but the CHINKS and PAKIS did the very same. Let us not forget the natives of North America. Many, many such women were raped by the North American natives. They did not do this as part of 'war' or anything. They did it for a chance to possess what they believed was a bunch of Goddesses. The natives took one look at their own women, then at our women and said to their women 'fuck you, I am going to rape me a fucking white blue-eyed blonde Aryan bitch you stupid cunt. I am tired of comparing your ugly bug with such God-like beauty!'


NO.

Its not JUST a movie.

ITS MASSIVE PROPAGANDA.

Its brainwashing people on a global scale to hate blacks and portray them as rapists of white woman.


It promotes internecine hatred and warfare.

It promotes blacks as savages.That scene on the (racially named) Skull Island was racially ridiculous where as soon as they see white women they go crazy with their spears and bongo drums and their evil chantings.


It stereotypes them as savages and kidnappers who make banging noises when they see a white woman with blonde hair.

For example when YOU see a banana you automatically associate it with monkeys and black people because of the 60 years of associated imagery in your head from books,magazines,tv,movies.

Your attempt to belittle the issue shows you to be insensitive and accepting of racial stereotyping so that your ego can feel superior.
 
Jaster said:
Its brainwashing people on a global scale to hate blacks and portray them as rapists of white woman.
But they are.


It promotes blacks as savages.That scene on the (racially named) Skull Island was racially ridiculous where as soon as they see white women they go crazy with their spears and bongo drums and their evil chantings.
Most blacks living in such environs are like this.


It stereotypes them as savages and kidnappers who make banging noises when they see a white woman with blonde hair.
I wouldn't think those stereotypes had anything to do with her blonde hair.

For example when YOU see a banana you automatically associate it with monkeys and black people because of the 60 years of associated imagery in your head from books,magazines,tv,movies.
Utter claptrap. If blacks remind people of monkeys, it's because they resemble them more than other groups of people.
 
If you really are serious about this, watch the first film, and then get back to us.
 
I've only seen the originals. But Jaster's rant has to be a troll.

Either that, or he's a black person with serious inadequacy issues.
 
No, I can understand how a n00b (in relation to the history of King Kong, ie, he's suggesting he thinks this is an original) would get that off of Jackson's film.

If it's a troll, then I want first dibs on throatfucking him 'til he vomits blood.
 
Messenger said:
But they are.



Most blacks living in such environs are like this.



I wouldn't think those stereotypes had anything to do with her blonde hair.


Utter claptrap. If blacks remind people of monkeys, it's because they resemble them more than other groups of people.


Look you need to check the history of the 1933 King Kong film
and the people who made it.

just type in "King Kong racist" in google and you will see the origins of the film were based on profound racism.

I fear you do not want to address your own prejudices and thats why you never had a decent argument.


Look I can prove my point without insulting anyone unlike some people above.


I can prove it.

When you see nature/animal documentaries on tv the genetalia of animals is not removed or blocked or pixilated.


right?

you got that?

in fact you see programs on discovery channel etc showing animals mating on daytime tv.

right?

you got that?


now in the film the penis of King Kong was conspicous by its absence.

why?

this is a very important point.

if he was meant to be portrayed as an animal they would not have removed his penis.

but BECAUSE HE WAS MEANT TO PORTRAY A BESTIAL STEREOTYPICAL BLACK SAVAGE WHO WANTS TO KIDNAP/RAPE WHITE VIRGIN BLONDES THAT WHY HIS PENIS WAS NOT VISIABLE BECAUSE because that is not allowed on mainstream dytime tv/mainstream none x -rated fims.

King Kong is meant to SYMBOLIZE a black person that why his penis was removed.If hewas meant to portray an animal then his penis would not have been removed as proved in the discovery nature channels programs
on daytime tv.

you got that?

i.e full frontal nudity of men is not allowed on mainstream daytime tv/non x-rated films.

you got that?


this proves that king kong was not just a gorilla on the rampage but meant to symbolise blacks.



When you say youdont see apes as blacks you are either lying or self delusional. White people see blacks as apes.Thats why when you see a banana you associate IT with blacks and apes.

Blusemen has even admitted it above.

On Skull Island blacks were portrayed as crazy drum banging savages.Why?

Why did they kidnap a white blonde girl.The film portrayed them as rapists and kidnappers of white virgen blonde girls.

And portrayed blacks as killers, savages,kidnappers and bestial savages.

Did you see the bones?

Why?


When you see images of a jungle the mental picture conjured in your heads is of black cannibals boiling people to eat them and blacks living in mudhuts or swinging from the trees throwing spears.

Bluesmen has even admitted it above.

When you see blacks on TV you hate them even more because they have a better job then you and you feel even more justification for your intense hatred and loathing of all blacks.

For example if you had a black friend and you fell out and had a fight the FIRST abuse you would use against the black would be "black bastard" or "nigger".

In King Kong blacks are portrayed as rapists of white blonde women and must therefore be machine gunned to death.

In King Kong the giant ape had no penis?

Where was it? well?

This as an attempt to portray blacks as bestial savages but without an actual penis.

Even when King Kong was standing erect we could not see his penis yet blacks are portrayed as rapists of young blonde virgin white women.

Even when the blonde was between his legs we could not see his penis.

How could she be raped without a penis?

It makes no sense.

Why?

Why?

I ask you why?

For once you could actually try to address the profound and very logical arguments put to you instead of evading them.
 
Nah, I don't think any of that shit. I say nigger because I can. It's a great troll. I was taught this upon assimilating. It means nothing to me other than that. Well, not any more. And you know what, I'm, glad that word has lost it's emotional edge for me.

I grew up in Brighton, Mass in the early 60's, when they "integrated" the Boston Public Schools by shipping out all the blacks from Dorchester and Roxbury and Hyde Park and Jamaica Plain, so we'd have "diveristy".

You my friend are either young, or ignorant. I'm not flaming you with that last word either bubbaleh.
 
Jaster said:
Look you need to check the history of the 1933 King Kong film
and the people who made it.

just type in "King Kong racist" in google and you will see the origins of the film were based on profound racism.

I fear you do not want to address your own prejudices and thats why you never had a decent argument.


Look I can prove my point without insulting anyone unlike some people above.


I can prove it.

When you see nature/animal documentaries on tv the genetalia of animals is not removed or blocked or pixilated.


right?

you got that?

in fact you see programs on discovery channel etc showing animals mating on daytime tv.

right?

you got that?


now in the film the penis of King Kong was conspicous by its absence.

why?

this is a very important point.

if he was meant to be portrayed as an animal they would not have removed his penis.

but BECAUSE HE WAS MEANT TO PORTRAY A BESTIAL STEREOTYPICAL BLACK SAVAGE WHO WANTS TO KIDNAP/RAPE WHITE VIRGIN BLONDES THAT WHY HIS PENIS WAS NOT VISIABLE BECAUSE because that is not allowed on mainstream dytime tv/mainstream none x -rated fims.

King Kong is meant to SYMBOLIZE a black person that why his penis was removed.If hewas meant to portray an animal then his penis would not have been removed as proved in the discovery nature channels programs
on daytime tv.

you got that?

i.e full frontal nudity of men is not allowed on mainstream daytime tv/non x-rated films.

you got that?


this proves that king kong was not just a gorilla on the rampage but meant to symbolise blacks.



When you say youdont see apes as blacks you are either lying or self delusional. White people see blacks as apes.Thats why when you see a banana you associate IT with blacks and apes.

Blusemen has even admitted it above.

On Skull Island blacks were portrayed as crazy drum banging savages.Why?

Why did they kidnap a white blonde girl.The film portrayed them as rapists and kidnappers of white virgen blonde girls.

And portrayed blacks as killers, savages,kidnappers and bestial savages.

Did you see the bones?

Why?


When you see images of a jungle the mental picture conjured in your heads is of black cannibals boiling people to eat them and blacks living in mudhuts or swinging from the trees throwing spears.

Bluesmen has even admitted it above.

When you see blacks on TV you hate them even more because they have a better job then you and you feel even more justification for your intense hatred and loathing of all blacks.

For example if you had a black friend and you fell out and had a fight the FIRST abuse you would use against the black would be "black bastard" or "nigger".

In King Kong blacks are portrayed as rapists of white blonde women and must therefore be machine gunned to death.

In King Kong the giant ape had no penis?

Where was it? well?

This as an attempt to portray blacks as bestial savages but without an actual penis.

Even when King Kong was standing erect we could not see his penis yet blacks are portrayed as rapists of young blonde virgin white women.

Even when the blonde was between his legs we could not see his penis.

How could she be raped without a penis?

It makes no sense.

Why?

Why?

I ask you why?

For once you could actually try to address the profound and very logical arguments put to you instead of evading them.
I'll try my best:
 
Messenger said:
I'll try my best:

well done sull.you are the only one who has conjured up more than a paragraph unlike some other people i could mention.

however you are still wrong

Look why do you insist on trying to delude yourself that King Kong is not racist?


its called pavlovian conditioning.
blacks are being associated with bad things in the film so that when you
see a black you will think bad things about blacks.

i have more proof:-


http://stangoff.com/?p=181


i quote...
blacks are a threat whites by being portrayed as black sexual monsters who instill fears in whites...



i further quote...

King Kong and the White Woman
Filed under: General, Gender, Race & Nation
By Stan at 4:16 am, 9/1/05

King Kong and the White Woman: Hustler Magazine and the Demonization of Black Masculinity

Published in Journal of Violence Against Women, 1998, Vol. 4 No 3, (291-307)

by Gail Dines

From the box office success of The Birth of a Nation in 1915 to the national obsession with O.J. Simpson, the image of the black male as the spoiler of white womanhood has been a staple of media representation in this country. The demonization by the media of black men as rapists and murderers has been well documented by scholars interested in film (Carby, 1993; Guerrero, 1993; Mercer, 1994; Snead, 1994; Wiegman, 1993; Winston, 1982), news (Entman, 1990; Gray, 1989) and rap music (Dyson, 1993; Rose, 1994th........e ck men as outside the “normal†realm of (white) masculinity by constructing them as “other†(Wiegman, 1993). Although both the “Uncle Tom†and the sexual monster continue to define the limits of black male representation in mainstream media, it is the latter image which dominates, and, according to Mercer (1994), serves to legitimize racist practices such as mass incarceration of black men, police brutality and right-wing government policy.

Recently, scholars have turned their attention to pornography (Cowan & Campbell, 1994; Forna, 1992; Mayall amd Russell, 1993; Mercer, 1994) and............. black male body, especially the penis, as dangerous and a threat to white male power............

Of the hundreds of mass-produced, mass-distributed pornography magazines the three best sellers are Playboy, Penthouse and Hustler (Osanka, 1989). While these three magazines are often lumped together they differ marked............. editorials, constructs a world populated by working-class whites who live in trailer homes, eat in fast-food restaurants and wear ill-fitting clothes. While blacks are absent from most sections of the magazine, they appear regularly in caricatured form in the cartoons where they are depicted as competing with white men for the few sexually available white women. Hustler cartoons depict a world filled with seething racial tensions brought about by the black male’s alleged insatiable appetite for white women. The competition between black and white men and the ultimate victory of the black male is the source of much “humor†in Hustler c.........., what happens if black masculinity is allowed to go uncontained. ....... myth where black masculinity, having been allowed to run amok because of liberal policies, has finally rendered white men impotent, both sexually and economically.

From “The Birth of A Nation†to “Black Studsâ€

Theorists such as Wiegman (1993) and Snead (1994) have traced the beginnings of the image of the black man as sexual monster back to the late nineteenth century, as the product of a white supremacist ideology which saw the end of slavery as bringing about an unleashing of animalistic, brute violence inherent in African-American men. D.W. Griffith’s The Birth of a Nation (1915), was, without question, the first major mass circulation of this image in film and was to become the blueprint for how contemporary mass media depicts black males.

The notion of the black male as sexual monster has been linked to the economic vulnerability that white working-class men feel in the face of a capitalist economy over which they have little power. Guerrero (1993), in his discussion of the emergence of this new stereotype in the novels of Thomas Dixon, suggests ........... depreciated sense of manhood by taking up the honorific task of protecting White Womanhood against the newly constructed specter of the “brute Negro†(p. 12).

This encoding of the economic threat within a sexual context, is, according to Snead (1994), the principal mechanism of cinematic racism and is one of the subplots of the enormously successful King Kong movie (re-named King Kong and the White Women in Germany). Arguing that “in all Hollywood film portrayals of blacks … the political is never far from the sexual†Snead links the image of King-Kong rampaging through the streets of Manhattan with a defenseless white woman clutched to his body to the increasing economic emasculation of white men in the Depression years and the growing fear that black migration from the South had reduced the number of jobs available to working-class whites. King Kong’s death at the end of the movie remasculinizes the white man, not only by his conquering of the black menace but also by regaining the woman. In this way, representations of black men and white men are not isolated images working independently but rather “correlate … in a larger scheme of semiotic valuation†(Snead, 1994: 4). Thus, the image of the black male as sexual savage serves to construct white male sexuality as the protector of white womanhood, as contained and, importantly, as capable of intimacy and humanity.

In her analysis of black and white masculinity in Hollywood movies, Jones (1993), argues that although black and white actors are increasingly portrayed in terms of a violent masculinity, for white actors this violence is tempered by his sexually intimate scenes with a white woman. These scenes assures the audience that for all his violence, the white male is still capable of bonding with another human being and of forming relationships. For black actors, however, this humanizing quality is absent and thus he can only be defined in terms of his violence. The problem with these types of representations is that, according to Jones, “they suggest that there are fundamental differences in the sexual behavior of black males and white males and are ultimately indicative of the psychic inferiority of the black male†(1993: 250), and the superiority of white masculinity.

Hard-core pornography similarly depicts black men as more sexually dehumanized than white men. ....... (Cowan & Campbell, 1994; Mayall amd Russell, 1993), have found that it is black male characters who are granted the least humanity and are most lacking in ability to be intimate. Moreover, in movies and magazines which feature black men, the focus of the camera and plot is often the size of his penis and his alleged insatiable sexual appetite for white women. Movies with titles such as Big Bad Black Dicks, Black Stallions on Top, Black PricksWhite Pussy, and Black Studs, draw attention to the black male body and in particular the penis, a rare occurrence in pornography targeted at heterosexual men. Movies such as The Adventures of Mr. Tootsie Pole (Bo Entertainment Groups) feature a black male and white female on the cover. The text beneath the picture says “he’s puttin his prodigious pole to the test in tight white pussy.†In Black Studs (Glitz Entertainment), three white women are shown having sex with three Black men. Above the pictures, the text reads, “These girls can’t get enough of that long black dick.†The penis becomes the defining feature of the black man and his wholeness as a human being is thus rendered invisible.

....abuse of white women by black men began appearing in the late 1970s and by the mid-1980s, Hustler was running an average of 2-3 such cartoons an issue. Hustler was by no means the first to produce such as image but it is probably the first mass-distributed cultural product (albeit in caricatured form) to visually depict an enormous black penis actually doing severe physical damage to the vagina of a small white women.....


READ THE WHOLE ARTICLE.

at:-

http://stangoff.com/?p=181



SEE?

THIS SCHOLARLY ARTICLE VINDICATES MY EVIDENCE BASED PROPOSTION.

That King Kong is designed to promote race hatred and devision to increase racial tensions to profit those who benefit from these tensions and hatred....

Peter Jackson must be racist and even in the Lord of the Rings all evil was portrayed as black while whites and blondes were all good.


We wonder why Peter Jackson is such....
 
Jaster said:
well done sull.you are the only one who has conjured up more than a paragraph unlike some other people i could mention.

however you are still wrong

Look why do you insist on trying to delude yourself that King Kong is not racist?


its called pavlovian conditioning.
blacks are being associated with bad things in the film so that when you
see a black you will think bad things about blacks.

i have more proof:-


http://stangoff.com/?p=181


i quote...
blacks are a threat whites by being portrayed as black sexual monsters who instill fears in whites...



i further quote...

King Kong and the White Woman
Filed under: General, Gender, Race & Nation
By Stan at 4:16 am, 9/1/05

King Kong and the White Woman: Hustler Magazine and the Demonization of Black Masculinity

Published in Journal of Violence Against Women, 1998, Vol. 4 No 3, (291-307)

by Gail Dines

From the box office success of The Birth of a Nation in 1915 to the national obsession with O.J. Simpson, the image of the black male as the spoiler of white womanhood has been a staple of media representation in this country. The demonization by the media of black men as rapists and murderers has been well documented by scholars interested in film (Carby, 1993; Guerrero, 1993; Mercer, 1994; Snead, 1994; Wiegman, 1993; Winston, 1982), news (Entman, 1990; Gray, 1989) and rap music (Dyson, 1993; Rose, 1994th........e ck men as outside the “normal†realm of (white) masculinity by constructing them as “other†(Wiegman, 1993). Although both the “Uncle Tom†and the sexual monster continue to define the limits of black male representation in mainstream media, it is the latter image which dominates, and, according to Mercer (1994), serves to legitimize racist practices such as mass incarceration of black men, police brutality and right-wing government policy.

Recently, scholars have turned their attention to pornography (Cowan & Campbell, 1994; Forna, 1992; Mayall amd Russell, 1993; Mercer, 1994) and............. black male body, especially the penis, as dangerous and a threat to white male power............

Of the hundreds of mass-produced, mass-distributed pornography magazines the three best sellers are Playboy, Penthouse and Hustler (Osanka, 1989). While these three magazines are often lumped together they differ marked............. editorials, constructs a world populated by working-class whites who live in trailer homes, eat in fast-food restaurants and wear ill-fitting clothes. While blacks are absent from most sections of the magazine, they appear regularly in caricatured form in the cartoons where they are depicted as competing with white men for the few sexually available white women. Hustler cartoons depict a world filled with seething racial tensions brought about by the black male’s alleged insatiable appetite for white women. The competition between black and white men and the ultimate victory of the black male is the source of much “humor†in Hustler c.........., what happens if black masculinity is allowed to go uncontained. ....... myth where black masculinity, having been allowed to run amok because of liberal policies, has finally rendered white men impotent, both sexually and economically.

From “The Birth of A Nation†to “Black Studsâ€

Theorists such as Wiegman (1993) and Snead (1994) have traced the beginnings of the image of the black man as sexual monster back to the late nineteenth century, as the product of a white supremacist ideology which saw the end of slavery as bringing about an unleashing of animalistic, brute violence inherent in African-American men. D.W. Griffith’s The Birth of a Nation (1915), was, without question, the first major mass circulation of this image in film and was to become the blueprint for how contemporary mass media depicts black males.

The notion of the black male as sexual monster has been linked to the economic vulnerability that white working-class men feel in the face of a capitalist economy over which they have little power. Guerrero (1993), in his discussion of the emergence of this new stereotype in the novels of Thomas Dixon, suggests ........... depreciated sense of manhood by taking up the honorific task of protecting White Womanhood against the newly constructed specter of the “brute Negro†(p. 12).

This encoding of the economic threat within a sexual context, is, according to Snead (1994), the principal mechanism of cinematic racism and is one of the subplots of the enormously successful King Kong movie (re-named King Kong and the White Women in Germany). Arguing that “in all Hollywood film portrayals of blacks … the political is never far from the sexual†Snead links the image of King-Kong rampaging through the streets of Manhattan with a defenseless white woman clutched to his body to the increasing economic emasculation of white men in the Depression years and the growing fear that black migration from the South had reduced the number of jobs available to working-class whites. King Kong’s death at the end of the movie remasculinizes the white man, not only by his conquering of the black menace but also by regaining the woman. In this way, representations of black men and white men are not isolated images working independently but rather “correlate … in a larger scheme of semiotic valuation†(Snead, 1994: 4). Thus, the image of the black male as sexual savage serves to construct white male sexuality as the protector of white womanhood, as contained and, importantly, as capable of intimacy and humanity.

In her analysis of black and white masculinity in Hollywood movies, Jones (1993), argues that although black and white actors are increasingly portrayed in terms of a violent masculinity, for white actors this violence is tempered by his sexually intimate scenes with a white woman. These scenes assures the audience that for all his violence, the white male is still capable of bonding with another human being and of forming relationships. For black actors, however, this humanizing quality is absent and thus he can only be defined in terms of his violence. The problem with these types of representations is that, according to Jones, “they suggest that there are fundamental differences in the sexual behavior of black males and white males and are ultimately indicative of the psychic inferiority of the black male†(1993: 250), and the superiority of white masculinity.

Hard-core pornography similarly depicts black men as more sexually dehumanized than white men. ....... (Cowan & Campbell, 1994; Mayall amd Russell, 1993), have found that it is black male characters who are granted the least humanity and are most lacking in ability to be intimate. Moreover, in movies and magazines which feature black men, the focus of the camera and plot is often the size of his penis and his alleged insatiable sexual appetite for white women. Movies with titles such as Big Bad Black Dicks, Black Stallions on Top, Black PricksWhite Pussy, and Black Studs, draw attention to the black male body and in particular the penis, a rare occurrence in pornography targeted at heterosexual men. Movies such as The Adventures of Mr. Tootsie Pole (Bo Entertainment Groups) feature a black male and white female on the cover. The text beneath the picture says “he’s puttin his prodigious pole to the test in tight white pussy.†In Black Studs (Glitz Entertainment), three white women are shown having sex with three Black men. Above the pictures, the text reads, “These girls can’t get enough of that long black dick.†The penis becomes the defining feature of the black man and his wholeness as a human being is thus rendered invisible.

....abuse of white women by black men began appearing in the late 1970s and by the mid-1980s, Hustler was running an average of 2-3 such cartoons an issue. Hustler was by no means the first to produce such as image but it is probably the first mass-distributed cultural product (albeit in caricatured form) to visually depict an enormous black penis actually doing severe physical damage to the vagina of a small white women.....


READ THE WHOLE ARTICLE.

at:-

http://stangoff.com/?p=181



SEE?

THIS SCHOLARLY ARTICLE VINDICATES MY EVIDENCE BASED PROPOSTION.

That King Kong is designed to promote race hatred and devision to increase racial tensions to profit those who benefit from these tensions and hatred....

Peter Jackson must be racist and even in the Lord of the Rings all evil was portrayed as black while whites and blondes were all good.


We wonder why Peter Jackson is such....


Psst? Since the dawn of Mankind, black has been the colour to represent evil. The fact niggers are black is mere coincidence. Ever hear of the battle between Good and Evil? The forces of Light and Darkness? Tell me, in which colour have we described Darkness as being? No. Not orange. Black. Now you will state the Bible is racist? That Jews hated niggers almost 2000 years ago? The Egyptians, although not quite black also a force of Darkness as being represented by the colour black. Those fucking goddamned racist Egyptians! How dare they. Look below:
apes-angels.jpg

Oh my!! How dreadful! That is a racist picture! Death is painted black! We must take Death to court for spreading his racist bullshit! Wait. I have another:
0012-0301-1919-5054_SM.jpg


You see why King Kong is BLACK? Simple. Apes ARE black. So much for your theories. Now run along before I further make you my bitch. Go whine somewhre else. I abhor the self-hatred of the lesser races. It becomes rather annoying.
 
Jaster said:
Peter Jackson of Lord of the Rings fame has remade King Kong.

I saw this film.

I cried after seeing this film.

I have no hatred for Peter Jackson or his team of amazing folks. What this person... hates...… cannot stand and thinks should be relegated to the same dark, murky hole in Hades that hopefully holds the entire body of black-face entertainment is the story.

King Kong, which was made famous as a 1930’s film, is the story of a white, very white...extremely white and Aryan the way Ann Coulter wishes she was Aryan...woman who some how ends up on a tropical, very tropical, WILD and untamed island populated by…NATIVES! Yep, natives who become entranced with this Aryan representation of civilized female beauty even though they have never set eyes on a white woman. Depending on the version, they either have always worshiped white women or simply begin to worship them once they set eyes on the blond bombshell that plops down on their island.

Now, they have a secret. A big f******* secret! There is a giant highly sexualized primate lurking on the island! Oh no! Jesus, why would a loving Gawd ever create such a beast? In the words of Wolf Blitzer…he’s so black!

In order to pacify said giant black primate, the natives offer up sacrificial women. The giant primate then takes the women and leaves the natives alone for a while. ‘Cause…well, you know…he's getting his freak on. And everyone knows that giant sexualized primates are soothed and calmed by the company of a terrified nubile woman.

Even though the regular offering of native women has pacified the giant primate, the natives know that this stunning white woman will put his ass over the top. S***, they started coveting her right from the start! No way is their giant highly sexualized primate going to turn down a tryst with an unwilling blond beauty.

So, they capture the girl, tie her ass to a stake and offer her.

The giant primate, who represents society’s notion that black men are obsessed with white women and are driven into uncontrollable frenzies by them, comes upon the blond and…well…becomes obsessed with her and is driven into an uncontrollable frenzy.

It gets better!

The blond, at first disgusted and terrified by the giant black primate, begins to fall under its spell. This is vital, because EVERYONE knows that the black man…oh, sh**…no that would be the 'giant black primate' has skills and, given enough time, can seduce pure untouched blonds with his sexual prowess!

Lets see...ummm...oh yes...blond is freed, primate is captured, marketing blitz hits New York, blond feels sorry for primate, primate is obsessing over blond, primate gets loose…city is terrorized, blond is kidnapped by obsessed primate, they get to the Empire State building and somehow the primate gets to the top. Makes sense since we’re talking about a GIANT primate who just has to be used to climbing tall buildings and sh** like that. Anyhoo… the primate, with blond in hand, is shot and falls to the bottom. Terrorized blond cries and primate dies with one...

large...

extremely large and black...

...f****** GIANT and BLAAAAAACK hand reaching out towards said virginal blond symbol of white pure beauty.

Sigh.

Yeah, a modern civilised well educated person f****** hates this story. My ass knows that Hollywood can’t and/or won’t get its sh** together regarding portrayals of them minorities. But f******* this f****** ****!

F******* everyone involved in bringing this historic insult back to the screen…to insult the f******** **** out of me again! F*********!

WAKE UP!.. WAKE UP..... it's the 21st f******** century !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And as far as the portrayal of women…oh sh**, that requires another post. Suffice it to say, King Kong is a revival of the pedestal and blondie sits right on top of it. Virginal, untouched, coveted…she is the ultimate possession…a literal theatrical attraction.

Between the portrayal of women and the resurrection of antiquated racial stereotypes, this self aware person can find little good in the King Kong story. Which means that this remake will join the other blockbuster films of 2005 on the worst films of all time list.

WAKE UP! WAKE UP! ITS THE 21 ST CENTURY.RIGHT?

Just an addendum. Apes are both black and brown. King Kong is a giant ape. He is black. Nothing wrong there.

The bitch he 'seduces' is a white blue-eyed blonde. Nothing out of the ordinary there since the story takes place in 1920's U.S.A. where the majority of the population was white AND many of the white females were blonde. The expedition that finds Kong is made of of white people. Niggers were not technogically savvy enough to even understand what an 'expedition' is. White people. Natives. A black ape. Absolutely nothing out of the ordinary so why the harping? Do you niggers have such powerful self-loathing that everything you see has to do with racism?

Better have GOD charged with hate crimes against niggers. He created the Earth. He made Light and saw that it was Good. He case my namesake out of Heaven and into the DARKEST pits of Hell. Many times my lord Lucifer has been depicted as wearing black. All Westerns show the good guys as wearing White and the evildoers as Black. This stems from the fact by far the majority of evil deeds are committed in the comfortable cloak of the blackest nights. This was all before whites even knew you niggers existed. Darwin understood why you niggers are the blackest of black. Simple. Protection against a powerful Sun otherwise you would be dead in a heartbeat. Ultraviolet rays in a tropical region can do that to someonel. Now the Sun is racist apparently because it seeks to kill off all you niggers.

The Scots who invented the tyre are also racist because they made them black. Evil Scots!! Let's take them to court for hate crimes!!

Those damn dinosaurs are racists too and they are dead!! How dare they! Cowards! They died off so they could not face a hate-crimes tribunal!! Look at their remains! Oil! The most potent force the world has ever seen which is capable of destroying entire nations! Figures they would make certain it is black!! How dare they! I say sue the fucking dinosaurs right back to the Stone Age!

Are not our lungs black when we die from smoking cigarettes? Those evil tobacco companies!! I shall swear vengeance upon them for ensuring that when our diseased lungs kill us, they are BLACK! Fucking racists!

Hanguns. The majority of them are black in colour. The manufacturers of handguns and many assault rifles, Heckler & Koch in particular, shall feel the wrath of my lawsuit against their blatant racism! They knew hundreds of years in advance that one day many of us niggers would use those guns of theirs to commit our many violent and evil deeds! To shame!! Goddamn motherfucking racists!
 
Back
Top