Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Israel admits phosphorous bombs used in Lebanon

Mentalist

Administrator
Staff member
By Helen McCormack

Published: 23 October 2006



The Israeli government has admitted for the first time that it used controversial phosphorous bombs during its 34-day war campaign in Lebanon.

Cabinet Minister Jacob Edery confirmed that the army had used the bombs to attack "military targets" during its war with Hizbollah in July and August. Previously, Israel had said the bombs had only been used to mark out targets.

During the conflict, doctors in Lebanon reported treating civilians who appeared to have been hit by the shells, which leave their victims with severe chemical wounds that can be fatal.

The reports led the Lebanese President, Emile Lahoud, to accuse Israel of breaching the Geneva Convention, which bans the use of white phosphorous both as an incendiary weapon against civilians and in air attacks against military forces in civilian areas. Yesterday, reports in the Israeli daily newspaper Haaretz revealed that Mr Edery confirmed to parliament last week that it had used the bombs during its operations this summer.

He did not, however, provide details on whether it had been used in any civilian areas, but maintained that the weapons had been used "according to international law".

Speaking on behalf of the Israeli Defence Minister Amir Peretz, Mr Edery said: "The Israeli army holds phosphorous munitions in different forms. The Israeli army made use of phosphorous shells during the war against Hizbollah in attacks against military targets in open ground."

Many human rights organisations, including the International Red Cross, have pushed for a complete ban on using the bombs on any human, rather than the protections towards civilians currently afforded by the Geneva Convention.

The admission of the use of the bomb comes as a 12-year-old boy was killed in Lebanon after ordnance from a cluster bomb exploded in his village in Halta, in southern Lebanon.
Rami Ali Hussein Shibly was picking olives in his village when the bomb exploded, injuring his younger brother, according to security officials.

His death brings the total number of recorded victims of cluster bomb explosions in Lebanon since the conflict began to 21, with another 100 injured, according to the United Nations.

Israel has been accused by both the UN and human rights groups of firing up to four million cluster bombs into Lebanon during its war with Hizbollah, which ended in a UN-brokered ceasefire on 14 August.

UN de-mining experts say up to one million of the cluster bombs failed to explode immediately and continue to threaten civilians, especially children who can mistake the ordnance for batteries or other small objects.

Earlier this month, the British charity Landmine Action warned that the number of civilians falling victim to cluster bombs would rise as people from southern Lebanon return to their homes following the ceasefire.

The Israeli government has admitted for the first time that it used controversial phosphorous bombs during its 34-day war campaign in Lebanon.


Cabinet Minister Jacob Edery confirmed that the army had used the bombs to attack "military targets" during its war with Hizbollah in July and August.


Previously, Israel had said the bombs had only been used to mark out targets.
During the conflict, doctors in Lebanon reported treating civilians who appeared to have been hit by the shells, which leave their victims with severe chemical wounds that can be fatal.


The reports led the Lebanese President, Emile Lahoud, to accuse Israel of breaching the Geneva Convention, which bans the use of white phosphorous both as an incendiary weapon against civilians and in air attacks against military forces in civilian areas. Yesterday, reports in the Israeli daily newspaper Haaretz revealed that Mr Edery confirmed to parliament last week that it had used the bombs during its operations this summer.


He did not, however, provide details on whether it had been used in any civilian areas, but maintained that the weapons had been used "according to international law".


Speaking on behalf of the Israeli Defence Minister Amir Peretz, Mr Edery said: "The Israeli army holds phosphorous munitions in different forms. The Israeli army made use of phosphorous shells during the war against Hizbollah in attacks against military targets in open ground."



Many human rights organisations, including the International Red Cross, have pushed for a complete ban on using the bombs on any human, rather than the protections towards civilians currently afforded by the Geneva Convention.
The admission of the use of the bomb comes as a 12-year-old boy was killed in Lebanon after ordnance from a cluster bomb exploded in his village in Halta, in southern Lebanon.


Rami Ali Hussein Shibly was picking olives in his village when the bomb exploded, injuring his younger brother, according to security officials.
His death brings the total number of recorded victims of cluster bomb explosions in Lebanon since the conflict began to 21, with another 100 injured, according to the United Nations.


Israel has been accused by both the UN and human rights groups of firing up to four million cluster bombs into Lebanon during its war with Hizbollah, which ended in a UN-brokered ceasefire on 14 August.


UN de-mining experts say up to one million of the cluster bombs failed to explode immediately and continue to threaten civilians, especially children who can mistake the ordnance for batteries or other small objects.


Earlier this month, the British charity Landmine Action warned that the number of civilians falling victim to cluster bombs would rise as people from southern Lebanon return to their homes following the ceasefire.
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article1919396.ece


I posted about the fact that Israel was using Phosphorus based weapons during the Lebanon conflict and the evidence was overwhelming that they were not using it as "just a smoke screen" as is required under UN law, mainly shown by the fact that their were children burnt to smitherens by it.

I'm just so shocked :roll:
 
bad dog said:
Good , I am glad the rag head terrorist buttkissers got roasted.

And with statements like that, you establish that you're ab-so-fucking-lutely no better than the very worst of them.
 
Where did I read somewhere that Canadian troops had used phosphorous bombs to try and burn the Taliban out of 10 foot high Marijuana fields?

Now that I would want to see.
 
Gurk_MacGuintey said:
Question: Do phosphorous weapons kill the enemy more efficiently?

Answer: Yes.

So what's the problem?

The problem is that they destroy the image of the nation using them as "the good guys." This image problem causes the use of such weapons to, at best, lose their effectiveness as a deterrent and, at worst, provoke an increase in both the brutality and frequency of further attacks.

You fucking dolt.
 
The Question said:
The problem is that they destroy the image of the nation using them as "the good guys." This image problem causes the use of such weapons to, at best, lose their effectiveness as a deterrent and, at worst, provoke an increase in both the brutality and frequency of further attacks.

You fucking dolt.

What a pussy!

Who cares if muslim scum think you're "the good guy" or not?

Who cares what France or the UK think, for that matter, since most of Europe has effectively "submitted" to the muslim scum and sink deeper and deeper into dhimmitude with each passing month.

You need to wake up, Questard, and realize that when the 5th column media here in the US talks about "image problems" they are talking about how the enemy who wants to destroy us and kill us view us.

I for one applaud the use of phosphorous and cluster bombs on muslim sub-human filth. Every time a tiny muslim mudlet kidling sets off an old cluster bomb and has its guts splashed out all over the dust, that's one less muslim scum who'll grow up to become a jihadi murderer.
 
The reports led the Lebanese President, Emile Lahoud, to accuse Israel of breaching the Geneva Convention, which bans the use of white phosphorous both as an incendiary weapon against civilians and in air attacks against military forces in civilian areas.

Helen McCormack, Mentalist, and The Question have yet to complain about Islamic attacks against civilian areas. When they do, then we should give a fuck about this stupid article.

-Ogami
 
The Question said:
And with statements like that, you establish that you're ab-so-fucking-lutely no better than the very worst of them.

Ok , next time your buddies are out riding around in thier car bomb and a hellfire missle rolls in at 900 mph and turns them to toast I will laugh my ass off.
 
^^Ignorant little prick, aren't you? You ignore:

-that I've said, several times now, that I despise both Israel's military and its enemies.

-that the very words you quoted -- "no better than" -- makes this absolutely fucking clear.
 
The old Clinton strategy of 'triangulation', where you put yourself above the fray and tut-tut that both sides are equally at fault.

What a tough stand to take, Question, that took real balls. :P

-Ogami
 
Ogami said:
The old Clinton strategy of 'triangulation', where you put yourself above the fray and tut-tut that both sides are equally at fault.

What a tough stand to take, Question, that took real balls. :P

-Ogami

Yeah, because looking tough is always better than being right.
 
It's intellectually vacant, you can triangulate any issue. Then you put down anyone who dares take a position, as if they were stupid for taking one.

On the plus side, that means I usually win arguments by default. Still waiting for that 'better plan' to fight the war on terror you people keep talking about.

-Ogami
 
Ogami said:
It's intellectually vacant, you can triangulate any issue.

Funny, I thought we were talking about this issue. Are you afraid to talk about this issue now?

Then you put down anyone who dares take a position, as if they were stupid for taking one.

Oh, not at all. There are two stupid positions on this -- that the Israelis' brutality is justified, or that their enemies brutality is justified. Then there's the position I've taken, which is simply that neither is any less brutal, or holds any better claim to the moral high ground, than the other.

On the plus side, that means I usually win arguments by default.

On the con side, however, there's reality.

Still waiting for that 'better plan' to fight the war on terror you people keep talking about.

I've laid it out a dozen times -- pull all support of all regimes in the region, the only exceptions being those who help us more than they harm us. Israel fails to qualify under that stipulation, though I'd be happy to see them rise to the challenge and meet it. Frankly, though, they'd have a long damn way to go to repay in money and material goods alone what our government has given them without our consent.
 
Fucking mudslims act like savages day in and day out. The least Israel can do is to fight barbaric, child-melting fire with fire. Go Israel!
 
Kefka said:
Fucking mudslims act like savages day in and day out. The least Israel can do is to fight barbaric, child-melting fire with fire. Go Israel!

But since the Israelis are no different, kill them all and let God sort them out. If even He can.
 
The Question said:
But since the Israelis are no different, kill them all and let God sort them out. If even He can.

Your moral equivalency is truly disturbing, Questard. The Israelis targeting muslim scum jihadis engaged in jihad is not the moral equivalent of muslim scum jihadis deliberately targetting civilian population centers. The Israelis using cluster bombs and phosphorous weapons to kill rat nests of jihadi subhumans who hide amongst women and children is not the moral equivalent of jihadis packing katushas with ball bearings designed to rend the flesh of the civilians they aim the katushas at.

What the fuck is wrong with you!?
 
Atlas_Collins said:
Your moral equivalency is truly disturbing, Questard. The Muslims targeting Israeli scum thieves engaged in ethnic cleansing is not the moral equivalent of Israeli scum thieves deliberately targetting civilian population centers and infrastructure.

It sure is.

The Israelis using cluster bombs and phosphorous weapons to kill rat nests of jihadi subhumans who hide amongst women and children is not the moral equivalent of jihadis packing katushas with ball bearings designed to rend the flesh of the civilians they aim the katushas at.

Yes, in fact it is.

What the fuck is wrong with you!?

Objectivity.
 
headvoid said:
Where did I read somewhere that Canadian troops had used phosphorous bombs to try and burn the Taliban out of 10 foot high Marijuana fields?

Now that I would want to see.

Canadian troops have never used phosphorus bombs you dumb shit. As a Canadian, I would know. Now see fit to shut the fuck up.
 
Top