The Amazing Messenger
New member
Israeli soldiers who beat, tortured Palestinian teens receive light sentence, no demotion
The IDF court obviously couldn't bring itself to mete out a harsher sentence, because this is what their soldiers do all the time when it comes to Palestinians - and worse.
What happened is that this case became public knowledge, so they had to do at least a little something to these men.
Israeli military announces plan to uproot 440 olive trees from Naalin village
Shaving off slivers of Palestinian land, one olive grove at a time. Destroying the livelihood of Palestinian farmers is old hat, though.
Israel's Shin Bet Intimidates Top Human Rights Medical Director and His Family
Israeli Parliament advances a bill to make Jerusalem capital of Israel and all the Jews
UN Resolution 250: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to refrain from holding military parade in Jerusalem".
UN Resolution 251: " . . . 'deeply deplores' Israeli military parade in Jerusalem in defiance of Resolution 250".
UN Resolution 252: " . . . 'declares invalid' Israel's acts to unify Jerusalem as Jewish capital".
UN Resolution 267: " . . . 'censures' Israel for administrative acts to change the status of Jerusalem".
UN Resolution 271: " . . . 'condemns' Israel's failure to obey UN resolutions on Jerusalem".
UN Resolution 298: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's changing of the status of Jerusalem".
UN Resolution 476: " . . . 'reiterates' that Israel's claim to Jerusalem are 'null and void'".
UN Resolution 478: " . . . 'censures (Israel) in the strongest terms' for its claim to Jerusalem in its 'Basic Law'".
An Israeli military court ruled Tuesday that three Israeli soldiers who beat, humiliated and attached electrodes to the faces of two 17-year old Palestinian detainees would not be demoted to the rank of private.
The two will receive a sentence of 5 months in jail, and will retain their army rank of staff sergeant when they are released.
The judge's ruling stated, "The humiliation of helpless minors… is an ugly act which badly harms not only the immediate victims of the offense, but the army's moral strength as well." But the judge ruled against a demotion of the three soldiers, stating, "such a heavy punishment does not reflect the many rights accumulated by the three during their service." The ruling went against an agreement made between the military prosecution and the soldiers' attorney that the soldiers would accept a demotion in exchange for a lighter sentence. In violation of that agreement, the judge ruled to allow both the light sentence and no demotion.
The incident in question took place in the settlement of Shavei Shomron in the occupied West Bank. The soldiers took two teenagers who were blindfolded and handcuffed, and beat them, forced them to say phrases in Hebrew, and attached a heating electrode to the face of one of the youth.
A fellow soldier who witnessed the incident reported the three soldiers to a superior. The three soldiers then bullied their colleague to try to get her not to testify about what she saw. At first, she succumbed to the bullying, but eventually, she told the commander the full version of what happened.
The three soldiers will return to the field after serving their terms, and will be in command of other soldiers charged with attacking and detaining Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.
The IDF court obviously couldn't bring itself to mete out a harsher sentence, because this is what their soldiers do all the time when it comes to Palestinians - and worse.
What happened is that this case became public knowledge, so they had to do at least a little something to these men.
Israeli military announces plan to uproot 440 olive trees from Naalin village
In a town that has become the forefront of the Palestinian non-violent resistance to the Israeli annexation Wall, the Palestinian residents of Naalin received notice today that the Israeli military plans to uproot hundreds of olive trees – the only source of revenue for most villagers.
Israeli officials say the trees will be relocated – but Palestinian farmers say that replanting of centuries-old olive trees is impossible, and the trees will most certainly die. The Palestinian farmers in the village depend on these trees for the yearly harvest of olives, which they press into olive oil. This is an age-old Palestinian tradition, that has been passed on by generations through the centuries.
According to villager Ibrahim Aahad Khawaja, "A tree, particularly an ancient one, will not survive if you move it from one place to another at this time of the year. Thus, we estimate that 90% of the relocated trees will not be able to bear fruit anymore."
According to the Israeli military, the Wall must be built through the village's land for Israel's 'security' concerns. But villagers point out that the village lies far from the established 'Green Line' border between the West Bank and Israel, and the route of the Wall through their land is actually to annex for Israel hundreds of acres of land on which Israeli settlements have already been constructed – in direct violation of international law.
Naalin has been holding weekly non-violent protests since last year. The protests challenge the annexation of their land for the construction of the Wall. These protests include both Palestinian and Israeli peace activists, as well as international observers.
The village is planing an ad hoc protest of this latest Israeli move on Wednesday.
Shaving off slivers of Palestinian land, one olive grove at a time. Destroying the livelihood of Palestinian farmers is old hat, though.
Israel's Shin Bet Intimidates Top Human Rights Medical Director and His Family
BBSNews 2008-06-03 -- While many in the United States have been focused on the upcoming general election in November, business as usual is occurring across the world in the Middle East in Israel, with the intimidating interrogation of Physicians for Human Rights Clinics Director Haj Yehya.
The deteriorating conditions in Gaza, particularly the serious medical complications arising from the US sanctioned Israeli blockade and collective punishment of Gaza civilians that yet continues even as Barack Obama becomes the presumptive Democratic nominee heading into the US November elections; it all will fall into the lap of the next US administration.
Secretary Condoleezza Rice has already conceded that hopes for an agreement ala the failed Annapolis Conference will have to be handed off to the next administration. She has signaled that the growing political crisis in Israel with the investigation of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert allegedly receiving cash from US businessman Morris Talansky, hopes for a peace deal during Bush II's dwindling term are now dashed.
This bodes ill for Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) and the other humanitarian groups working in and around the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as once again, any movement towards a peace deal have been thwarted by politics and international lethargy, but most of all, a total lack of any real engagement on the part of the current United States administration in calling on Israel to finally respect the UN resolutions that it must respect to achieve its own security.
The type of intimidation outlined by PHR is simply beyond belief. The dialog reads like a bad movie from the late 1940's. When a state organization, this time Israel's secret service Shin Bet, tells a human rights medical professional that "we know where your family members sleep" or that "we know where your children go to school" there is something seriously and systemically wrong in the state of Israel.
According to Haaretz, the Shin Bet interrogator even asked Yehya: "Would you mind if I called you once a while?" Would a US citizen be thrilled at the US Secret Service or Homeland Security giving them a periodic call to check in?
For its part, PHR sent out the following background on the case and the letter they have sent to the GSS:
On Monday, May 26, Physicians for Human Rights sent a letter to the head of the GSS, Yuval Diskin, in which the heads of the organization protest the attempt by the General Security Service to harm the organization's work and warn against the attempt to influence its policy and methods and intimidate a human rights organization. The letter was sent following the interrogation last week of Salah Haj Yehya, the organisation's Clinics Director, by the GSS.
Haj Yehya, who has worked for PHR for 20 years, was summoned for an interrogation following PHR-Israel's request to issue a doctors delegation to Gaza for the third time in the last six months to give medical aid and ascertain the health impact of ongoing Israeli policies in the Gaza Strip. Whereas all other members of the doctors' delegation received permission to enter, the Clinics Director was told he was "denied entry on security grounds". It should be noted that it was Haj Yehya who had organized and led the previous delegations to Gaza. In response to enquiries regarding the prohibition on his entry, the GSS claimed that PHR-Israel had exceeded its 'mandate' by engaging in 'political' affairs in the Gaza Strip besides its humanitarian activities.
On the evening of May 14 a police patrol car came to the home of the Clinics Director in Taybeh, Israel to summon him for investigation. The next day, he came to the Taybeh police station, assuming it was merely a mistake that could be clarified in the course of a conversation, because he was engaged in transparent and legal activities of the organization. However, during the interrogation, which took place on two levels -- the personal and the organizational -- it became clear that it was a matter of inappropriate interference by the GSS in a human rights organization's activity.
The GSS investigated PHR-Israel's Clinics Director about the organization's activity, its budget, its donors, the rates of its salaries and asked for information about other workers in the organization. It also asked how the members of the organization enter the occupied territories, how the safety of participants is ensured and how they transfer patients from Gaza to Israel. Emphasis was placed on the question of whether representatives of the organization had met Ismail Haniya and why they had talked (during their last visit to Gaza) with the Palestinian Minister of Health and head of the parliament. "When the Clinics Director asked his interrogators whether, according to the definitions of the GSS, we were allowed to converse with the Minister of Health, who is both a political and a professional figure, the interrogator failed to answer, whether because he knew the demand to avoid political activity was not valid or because he preferred to maintain vagueness in order to create embarrassment in the organization," said the letter.
On a personal level Haj Yehya was asked about his statements to the media and whether he was a member of the Islamic movement. Apart from the questioning, Haj Yehya was intimidated: he was presented with photographs of his house, and the GSS interrogator "Danny" reminded him that details of his personal life are known to them, including where each of the members of his family sleeps in his house, and where his children go to school.
"The personal summons of an employee of PHR-Israel, who works according to the guidelines of the Board of the organization, the sending of a police vehicle to his home, the segregation of this worker, an Arab Israeli who is not a doctor, from more protected members of the organization who are both Jewish Israelis and doctors, and the threatening insinuations made in the course of the interrogation, all constitute an unprecedented attack on PHR-Israel in particular and on the principles of human rights in general, and there is no place for such practices in a law-abiding state and a democratic society," said the letter.
Since the only reason given for the summonsing of our employee was his activity within the framework of our organization, we can only see the singling out and intimidation of one of our employees as completely unacceptable and illegal, since both this employee and the other doctors in the delegation to Gaza are engaged in identical activities, and act in accordance with the guidelines of the organization's Board.
Since PHR-Israel's letter, several other human rights organizations have expressed support and/or sent similar letters to the GSS, including Adva Center, Yesh Din, ACRI, B'Tselem, PCATI, Gisha and Adalah, as well as other international organizations.
Israeli Parliament advances a bill to make Jerusalem capital of Israel and all the Jews
The bill was submitted by the right wing Israeli National Religious party to amend the Basic law which considers Jerusalem as capital of Israel. The bill passed in the ruling coalition with a majority of 58 to 12.
In an interview with the Israeli online Haaretz Avhsalom Vilan, an Israeli MP who voted against the law change deemed the bill as "nonsense" adding that he is worried that this law will lead the collapse of the entire peace process.
Vilan also expressed worries that Jews around the world will be involved in decisions related to Jerusalem if such bill is finally approved.
"We're lying to ourselves for political reasons to make it impossible to reach a political solution in Jerusalem," he said. "Jerusalem will be the capital of the Palestinian state also," he added.
On the other hand, Palestinian officials are downplaying the chances that a solution can be reached by the end of 2008, as promised by Israeli and American high officials.
Ahmad Qurei, a senior Palestinian negotiator, said on Wednesday that only a miracle will bring peace by the end of the year.
Since Israel occupied the city of Jerusalem 1967 a great effort have been made by the Israel in Israeli to create a Jewish majority in Jerusalem. Palestinians demand that any lasting peace entails East Jerusalem as Capital of the future Palestinian state.
In 1982, Israelis Knesset passed a law to officially annex Jerusalem to Israel proper. Such a resolution reflected negatively on Palestinians who live in Jerusalem, especially that home-demolition under the pretext of no building permits increased. Israel rarely give permits to Palestinians to build in East Jerusalem.
UN Resolution 250: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to refrain from holding military parade in Jerusalem".
UN Resolution 251: " . . . 'deeply deplores' Israeli military parade in Jerusalem in defiance of Resolution 250".
UN Resolution 252: " . . . 'declares invalid' Israel's acts to unify Jerusalem as Jewish capital".
UN Resolution 267: " . . . 'censures' Israel for administrative acts to change the status of Jerusalem".
UN Resolution 271: " . . . 'condemns' Israel's failure to obey UN resolutions on Jerusalem".
UN Resolution 298: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's changing of the status of Jerusalem".
UN Resolution 476: " . . . 'reiterates' that Israel's claim to Jerusalem are 'null and void'".
UN Resolution 478: " . . . 'censures (Israel) in the strongest terms' for its claim to Jerusalem in its 'Basic Law'".