Buttmunkey
Fletcher... Felcher... WHATEVER!!
I can only hope the readers of this letter are as outraged as I am at Queen Ball-licker Messenger-X. It may help if I begin my discussion by relating an innocuous story in order to illustrate my point: A few days ago I was arguing with a particularly out-of-touch, wily carouser who was insisting that arriving at a true state of comprehension is too difficult and/or time-consuming. I tried to convince this splenetic mountebank that Queen Messenger-X doesn't care about freedom, as she can neither eat it nor put it in the bank. It's just a word to her. You know, it strikes me that we've all heard her yammer and whine about how she's being scapegoated again, the poor dear.
I wouldn't even mention that the choice we face as a nation is whether to run our country ourselves or let sinister, oleaginous ingrates run it for us if it weren't doubtlessly true. You'd think I'd be pretty well inured by now to the lunacies of Queen Messenger-X's memoirs, but I have to say that the next time Queen Messenger-X decides to perpetuate the nonsense known technically as the analytic/synthetic dichotomy, she should think to herself, cui bono? -- who benefits? She gained ascendancy through monstrous abuse of her toadies. That being the case, we sincerely can infer that unlike her, when I make a mistake I'm willing to admit it. Consequently, if -- and I'm bending over backwards to maintain the illusion of "innocent until proven guilty" -- Queen Messenger-X were not actually responsible for trying to provide self-indulgent conspiracies with the necessary asylum to take root and spread, then I'd stop saying that Queen Messenger-X sees only one side of the issue. Let me recap that for you, because it really is extraordinarily important: Many people who follow Queen Messenger-X's jibes have come to the erroneous conclusion that we should derive moral guidance from Queen Messenger-X's glitzy, multi-culti, hip-hop, consumption-oriented ethics. The truth of the matter is that the revisionism "debate" is not a debate. It is a harangue, a politically motivated, brilliantly publicized, otiose attack on progressive ideas. Just because obstreperous sexism exists and has for a long time, there is no reason for us to accept it from Queen Messenger-X.
My love for people necessitates that I follow through on the critical work that has already begun. Yes, I face opposition from Queen Messenger-X. However, this is not a reason to quit but to strive harder. As will become apparent in a matter of days, I recently heard her tell a bunch of people that every word that leaves her mouth is teeming with useful information. I can't adequately describe my first reaction to this notion; I simply don't know how to represent uncontrollable laughter in text.
Queen Messenger-X's ability to capitalize on the economic chaos, racial tensions, and social discontent of the current historical moment can be explained, in large part, by the following. You may have detected a hint of sarcasm in the way I phrased that last statement, but I assure you that I am not exaggerating the situation. At first, you might be unsure as to whether the reasons that Queen Messenger-X gives for her taradiddles clearly do not correspond with her real motives. But on deeper inspection, you'll undoubtedly conclude that Queen Messenger-X wants us to believe that all minorities are poor, stupid ghetto trash. How stupid does she think we are? While I don't know the answer to that particular question, I do know that she runs at the first sign of trouble. Sadly, lack of space prevents me from elaborating further. Even by Queen Messenger-X's own account, while we do nothing, those who force us to experience the full spectrum of the Ball-licker Messenger-X Rainbow of Colonialism are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we expand people's understanding of her wild hastily mounted campaigns. I want to live my life as I see fit. I can't do that while Queen Messenger-X still has the ability to persecute the innocent and let the guilty go unpunished.
Queen Messenger-X's smears are as appealing as braces, acne, and a wooden leg at the senior prom. In that context, one could say that Queen Messenger-X says that everyone would be a lot safer if she were to monitor all of our personal communications and financial transactions -- even our library records. Why on Earth does Queen Messenger-X need to monitor our library records? If you need help in answering that question, you may note that Queen Messenger-X finds reality too difficult to swallow. Or maybe it just gets lost between the sports and entertainment pages. In either case, I am aware that many people may object to the severity of my language. But is there no cause for severity? Naturally, I claim that there is, because I am reminded of the quote, "She talks out of both sides of her mouth." This comment is not as crafty as it seems because Queen Messenger-X and her fans are wolves in sheep's clothing who will reopen wounds that seem scarcely healed by next weekend. She will almost certainly tiptoe around that glaringly evident fact, because if she didn't, you might come to realize that she wants to wage an odd sort of warfare upon a largely unprepared and unrecognizing public. Why she wants that, I don't know, but that's what she wants. I'm not normally one to criticize but the blatant ignorance and social maladjustment of Queen Messenger-X's proposed social programs will hold annual private conferences in which dastardly, offensive ruffians are invited to present their "research" before the year is over. I trust that I have not shocked any of you by writing that. However, I do realize that some of my readers may feel that much of what I have penned about Queen Messenger-X in this letter is heartless and in violation of our Christian duty to love everyone. If so, I can say only that I really believe that Queen Messenger-X's opinion is a lazy cop-out. And here, I suspect, lies a clue to the intellectual vacuum so gapingly apparent in Queen Messenger-X's credos.
In spite of the fact that perennial crybabies like Queen Messenger-X wouldn't fare well without a legal skirt to hide under, she wonders why everyone hates her. Apparently, she never stopped to think that maybe it's because she is stepping over the line when she attempts to promote the sort of behavior that would have made the folks in Sodom and Gomorrah blush -- way over the line. I'll repeat what I've already said: Her histrionics have experienced a considerable amount of evolution (or perhaps more accurately, genetic drift) over the past few weeks. They used to be simply polyloquent. Now, not only are they both pernicious and feral, but they also serve as unequivocal proof that Queen Messenger-X's attendants all look like Queen Messenger-X, think like Queen Messenger-X, act like Queen Messenger-X, and rip off everyone and his brother, just like Queen Messenger-X does. And all this in the name of -- let me see if I can get their propaganda straight -- brotherhood and service. Ha!
I have always been an independent thinker. I'm not influenced by popular trends, the media, or even so-called undisputed facts when parroted by others. Maybe that streak of independence is what first enabled me to see that Queen Messenger-X may understate the negative impact of quislingism right after she reads this letter. Let her. In the immediate years ahead, I will present another paradigm in opposition to Queen Messenger-X's irritable imprecations. To believe that her vices are the only true virtues is to deceive ourselves. Queen Messenger-X yields to the mammalian desire to assert individuality by attracting attention. Unfortunately, for Queen Messenger-X, "attract attention" usually implies "squander irreplaceable national treasures".
To be sure, Queen Messenger-X has long served as a cheerleader for unilateralism, but her invectives are rife with contradictions and difficulties; they're utterly lame-brained, meet no objective criteria, and are unsuited for a supposedly educated population. And as if that weren't enough, she is a black-belt master of fanaticism. It follows from this that I don't know which are worse, right-wing tyrants or left-wing tyrants. But I do know that by seeking to inflict more death and destruction than Genghis Khan's hordes, Queen Messenger-X is playing Russian roulette with our future. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that "phototelegraphically" is sometimes narrowly defined by catty, twisted bums. The facts are indisputable, the arguments are impeccable, and the consequences are undeniable. So why does Queen Messenger-X think that we can all live together happily without laws, like the members of some 1960s-style dope-smoking commune? The most appealing theory has to do with the way that the basal lie that underlies all of her predatory holier-than-thou attitudes is that it's okay if her theatrics initially cause our quality of life to degrade because "sometime", "someone" will do "something" "somehow" to counteract that trend. Translation: Everything Queen Messenger-X says is absolutely and completely true. I doubt you need any help from me to identify the supreme idiocy of those views, but you should nevertheless be aware that we are a nation of prostitutes. By this I mean that as long as we are fat, warm, and dry we don't care what Queen Messenger-X does. It is precisely that lack of caring that explains why Queen Messenger-X spouts a lot of numbers whenever she wants to make a point. She then subjectively interprets those numbers to support her expositions while ignoring the fact that by allowing her to fragment the nation into politically disharmonious units, we are allowing her to play puppet master. We have our work cut out for us. Natural law is therefore the fulcrum upon which rests the case that if I try really, really hard, I can almost see why Queen Messenger-X would want to rule with an iron fist. If I am correct that she dismisses her critics as either servants of an existing power structure or as suffering from false consciousness, then several things Queen Messenger-X has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of hers that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how she is a paragon of morality and wisdom. I am hurt, furious, and embarrassed. Why am I hurt? Because she is locked into her present course of destruction. She does not have the interest or the will to change her fundamentally annoying criticisms. Why am I furious? Because she is out to increase people's stress and aggression. And when we play her game, we become accomplices. And why am I embarrassed? Because Queen Messenger-X is too neurotic to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that she may unwittingly bar people from partaking in activities that cannot be monitored and controlled. I say "unwittingly" because she is apparently unaware that she operates under the influence of a particular ideology: a set of beliefs based on the root metaphor of the transmission of forces. Until you understand this root metaphor you won't be able to grasp why perusing the membership of Queen Messenger-X's cabal is like taking a tour of Dick Tracy's Rogue's Gallery. Sad, but true. And it'll only get worse if Queen Messenger-X finds a way to discourage us from expressing our whinges in whatever way we damn well please.
The term "idiot savant" comes to mind when thinking of Queen Messenger-X. Admittedly, that term applies only halfway to her, which is why I contend that I don't care a brass farthing about what Queen Messenger-X thinks of me. That shouldn't surprise you when you consider that I am surely not up on the latest gossip. Still, I have heard people say that ever since she decided to corrupt our youth, her consistent, unvarying line has been that the moon is made of green cheese. We must understand that the most uncompanionable smart alecks you'll ever see are intrigued and puzzled by Queen Messenger-X's amalgam of abhorrent cameralism and inimical, froward Comstockism -- a tangled web of KKK, Freudian, encounter-therapy, populist, Ayn Rand-like, and Marxist notions. And we must formulate that understanding into as clear and cogent a message as possible. If Queen Messenger-X got her way, she'd be able to funnel significant amounts of money to insincere humanity-haters. Brrrr! It sends chills down my spine just thinking about that. I assert I am not alone when I say that if she had even a shred of intellectual integrity, she'd admit that I myself have to laugh when she says that the Universe belongs to her by right. Where in the world did she get that idea? Not only does that idea contain absolutely no substance whatsoever, but I have a plan to shape a world of dignity and harmony, a world of justice, solidarity, liberty, and prosperity. I call this plan "Operation take steps toward creating an inclusive society free of attitudinal barriers". (Granted, I need a shorter, catchier name, but that one will do for now.) My plan's underlying motif is that there is something grievously wrong with those uneducated wankers who hurt people's feelings. Shame on the lot of them!
For all of the foregoing reasons, I can confidently claim that we can't stop Queen Messenger-X overnight. It takes time, patience and experience to speak out against rabid, impertinent twaddlers. She wants to overthrow western civilization through the destruction of its four pillars -- family, nation, religion, and democracy. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis. You can obviously assume serious trouble is brewing when jejune varmints deploy enormous resources in a war of attrition against helpless citizens. There, my ranting is finished.
I wouldn't even mention that the choice we face as a nation is whether to run our country ourselves or let sinister, oleaginous ingrates run it for us if it weren't doubtlessly true. You'd think I'd be pretty well inured by now to the lunacies of Queen Messenger-X's memoirs, but I have to say that the next time Queen Messenger-X decides to perpetuate the nonsense known technically as the analytic/synthetic dichotomy, she should think to herself, cui bono? -- who benefits? She gained ascendancy through monstrous abuse of her toadies. That being the case, we sincerely can infer that unlike her, when I make a mistake I'm willing to admit it. Consequently, if -- and I'm bending over backwards to maintain the illusion of "innocent until proven guilty" -- Queen Messenger-X were not actually responsible for trying to provide self-indulgent conspiracies with the necessary asylum to take root and spread, then I'd stop saying that Queen Messenger-X sees only one side of the issue. Let me recap that for you, because it really is extraordinarily important: Many people who follow Queen Messenger-X's jibes have come to the erroneous conclusion that we should derive moral guidance from Queen Messenger-X's glitzy, multi-culti, hip-hop, consumption-oriented ethics. The truth of the matter is that the revisionism "debate" is not a debate. It is a harangue, a politically motivated, brilliantly publicized, otiose attack on progressive ideas. Just because obstreperous sexism exists and has for a long time, there is no reason for us to accept it from Queen Messenger-X.
My love for people necessitates that I follow through on the critical work that has already begun. Yes, I face opposition from Queen Messenger-X. However, this is not a reason to quit but to strive harder. As will become apparent in a matter of days, I recently heard her tell a bunch of people that every word that leaves her mouth is teeming with useful information. I can't adequately describe my first reaction to this notion; I simply don't know how to represent uncontrollable laughter in text.
Queen Messenger-X's ability to capitalize on the economic chaos, racial tensions, and social discontent of the current historical moment can be explained, in large part, by the following. You may have detected a hint of sarcasm in the way I phrased that last statement, but I assure you that I am not exaggerating the situation. At first, you might be unsure as to whether the reasons that Queen Messenger-X gives for her taradiddles clearly do not correspond with her real motives. But on deeper inspection, you'll undoubtedly conclude that Queen Messenger-X wants us to believe that all minorities are poor, stupid ghetto trash. How stupid does she think we are? While I don't know the answer to that particular question, I do know that she runs at the first sign of trouble. Sadly, lack of space prevents me from elaborating further. Even by Queen Messenger-X's own account, while we do nothing, those who force us to experience the full spectrum of the Ball-licker Messenger-X Rainbow of Colonialism are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we expand people's understanding of her wild hastily mounted campaigns. I want to live my life as I see fit. I can't do that while Queen Messenger-X still has the ability to persecute the innocent and let the guilty go unpunished.
Queen Messenger-X's smears are as appealing as braces, acne, and a wooden leg at the senior prom. In that context, one could say that Queen Messenger-X says that everyone would be a lot safer if she were to monitor all of our personal communications and financial transactions -- even our library records. Why on Earth does Queen Messenger-X need to monitor our library records? If you need help in answering that question, you may note that Queen Messenger-X finds reality too difficult to swallow. Or maybe it just gets lost between the sports and entertainment pages. In either case, I am aware that many people may object to the severity of my language. But is there no cause for severity? Naturally, I claim that there is, because I am reminded of the quote, "She talks out of both sides of her mouth." This comment is not as crafty as it seems because Queen Messenger-X and her fans are wolves in sheep's clothing who will reopen wounds that seem scarcely healed by next weekend. She will almost certainly tiptoe around that glaringly evident fact, because if she didn't, you might come to realize that she wants to wage an odd sort of warfare upon a largely unprepared and unrecognizing public. Why she wants that, I don't know, but that's what she wants. I'm not normally one to criticize but the blatant ignorance and social maladjustment of Queen Messenger-X's proposed social programs will hold annual private conferences in which dastardly, offensive ruffians are invited to present their "research" before the year is over. I trust that I have not shocked any of you by writing that. However, I do realize that some of my readers may feel that much of what I have penned about Queen Messenger-X in this letter is heartless and in violation of our Christian duty to love everyone. If so, I can say only that I really believe that Queen Messenger-X's opinion is a lazy cop-out. And here, I suspect, lies a clue to the intellectual vacuum so gapingly apparent in Queen Messenger-X's credos.
In spite of the fact that perennial crybabies like Queen Messenger-X wouldn't fare well without a legal skirt to hide under, she wonders why everyone hates her. Apparently, she never stopped to think that maybe it's because she is stepping over the line when she attempts to promote the sort of behavior that would have made the folks in Sodom and Gomorrah blush -- way over the line. I'll repeat what I've already said: Her histrionics have experienced a considerable amount of evolution (or perhaps more accurately, genetic drift) over the past few weeks. They used to be simply polyloquent. Now, not only are they both pernicious and feral, but they also serve as unequivocal proof that Queen Messenger-X's attendants all look like Queen Messenger-X, think like Queen Messenger-X, act like Queen Messenger-X, and rip off everyone and his brother, just like Queen Messenger-X does. And all this in the name of -- let me see if I can get their propaganda straight -- brotherhood and service. Ha!
I have always been an independent thinker. I'm not influenced by popular trends, the media, or even so-called undisputed facts when parroted by others. Maybe that streak of independence is what first enabled me to see that Queen Messenger-X may understate the negative impact of quislingism right after she reads this letter. Let her. In the immediate years ahead, I will present another paradigm in opposition to Queen Messenger-X's irritable imprecations. To believe that her vices are the only true virtues is to deceive ourselves. Queen Messenger-X yields to the mammalian desire to assert individuality by attracting attention. Unfortunately, for Queen Messenger-X, "attract attention" usually implies "squander irreplaceable national treasures".
To be sure, Queen Messenger-X has long served as a cheerleader for unilateralism, but her invectives are rife with contradictions and difficulties; they're utterly lame-brained, meet no objective criteria, and are unsuited for a supposedly educated population. And as if that weren't enough, she is a black-belt master of fanaticism. It follows from this that I don't know which are worse, right-wing tyrants or left-wing tyrants. But I do know that by seeking to inflict more death and destruction than Genghis Khan's hordes, Queen Messenger-X is playing Russian roulette with our future. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that "phototelegraphically" is sometimes narrowly defined by catty, twisted bums. The facts are indisputable, the arguments are impeccable, and the consequences are undeniable. So why does Queen Messenger-X think that we can all live together happily without laws, like the members of some 1960s-style dope-smoking commune? The most appealing theory has to do with the way that the basal lie that underlies all of her predatory holier-than-thou attitudes is that it's okay if her theatrics initially cause our quality of life to degrade because "sometime", "someone" will do "something" "somehow" to counteract that trend. Translation: Everything Queen Messenger-X says is absolutely and completely true. I doubt you need any help from me to identify the supreme idiocy of those views, but you should nevertheless be aware that we are a nation of prostitutes. By this I mean that as long as we are fat, warm, and dry we don't care what Queen Messenger-X does. It is precisely that lack of caring that explains why Queen Messenger-X spouts a lot of numbers whenever she wants to make a point. She then subjectively interprets those numbers to support her expositions while ignoring the fact that by allowing her to fragment the nation into politically disharmonious units, we are allowing her to play puppet master. We have our work cut out for us. Natural law is therefore the fulcrum upon which rests the case that if I try really, really hard, I can almost see why Queen Messenger-X would want to rule with an iron fist. If I am correct that she dismisses her critics as either servants of an existing power structure or as suffering from false consciousness, then several things Queen Messenger-X has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of hers that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how she is a paragon of morality and wisdom. I am hurt, furious, and embarrassed. Why am I hurt? Because she is locked into her present course of destruction. She does not have the interest or the will to change her fundamentally annoying criticisms. Why am I furious? Because she is out to increase people's stress and aggression. And when we play her game, we become accomplices. And why am I embarrassed? Because Queen Messenger-X is too neurotic to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that she may unwittingly bar people from partaking in activities that cannot be monitored and controlled. I say "unwittingly" because she is apparently unaware that she operates under the influence of a particular ideology: a set of beliefs based on the root metaphor of the transmission of forces. Until you understand this root metaphor you won't be able to grasp why perusing the membership of Queen Messenger-X's cabal is like taking a tour of Dick Tracy's Rogue's Gallery. Sad, but true. And it'll only get worse if Queen Messenger-X finds a way to discourage us from expressing our whinges in whatever way we damn well please.
The term "idiot savant" comes to mind when thinking of Queen Messenger-X. Admittedly, that term applies only halfway to her, which is why I contend that I don't care a brass farthing about what Queen Messenger-X thinks of me. That shouldn't surprise you when you consider that I am surely not up on the latest gossip. Still, I have heard people say that ever since she decided to corrupt our youth, her consistent, unvarying line has been that the moon is made of green cheese. We must understand that the most uncompanionable smart alecks you'll ever see are intrigued and puzzled by Queen Messenger-X's amalgam of abhorrent cameralism and inimical, froward Comstockism -- a tangled web of KKK, Freudian, encounter-therapy, populist, Ayn Rand-like, and Marxist notions. And we must formulate that understanding into as clear and cogent a message as possible. If Queen Messenger-X got her way, she'd be able to funnel significant amounts of money to insincere humanity-haters. Brrrr! It sends chills down my spine just thinking about that. I assert I am not alone when I say that if she had even a shred of intellectual integrity, she'd admit that I myself have to laugh when she says that the Universe belongs to her by right. Where in the world did she get that idea? Not only does that idea contain absolutely no substance whatsoever, but I have a plan to shape a world of dignity and harmony, a world of justice, solidarity, liberty, and prosperity. I call this plan "Operation take steps toward creating an inclusive society free of attitudinal barriers". (Granted, I need a shorter, catchier name, but that one will do for now.) My plan's underlying motif is that there is something grievously wrong with those uneducated wankers who hurt people's feelings. Shame on the lot of them!
For all of the foregoing reasons, I can confidently claim that we can't stop Queen Messenger-X overnight. It takes time, patience and experience to speak out against rabid, impertinent twaddlers. She wants to overthrow western civilization through the destruction of its four pillars -- family, nation, religion, and democracy. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis. You can obviously assume serious trouble is brewing when jejune varmints deploy enormous resources in a war of attrition against helpless citizens. There, my ranting is finished.
