PepeAngelus
New member
STAR TREK VS. STAR WARS, FINAL CHAPTER—THE EMPEROR’S NUDE
I've just found some troubling but explanatory information-- or should I say TOO MUCH information—about Mike “Darth” Wong. Basically,we're dealing with a pathological narcissist here-- I'm talking certifiable, NOT just a slightly "eccentric genius" (like he thinks he is).
I always wondered at Mike’s claim, that anyone who disagreed with him without submitting personal information regarding their name, rank, serial number, picture, and credentials, was a “coward—“ particularly when he would resort to devoting entire pages to publicly exposing and defaming people’s private lives in his geek’s “Sith-revenge.” After all, an argument should stand on its own merits; and it’s obvious to any normal person (emphasis on normal”), that a person would want to be able to participate in an on-line debate, without exposing themselves to public personal attack via defamation and invasions of privacy in their personal lives and information, to every sicko out there-- including being targeted by their harassment and death-threats etc… particularly by people who are typically so mentally unstable that they can’t discern reality from fiction (i.e. the typical “Warsie” mentality).
However now this begins to make sense why Mike wouldn’t understand why a person would want to maingain privacy and personal boundaries:
MIKE WONG DOESN’T UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPTS OF PRIVACY AND PERSONAL BOUNDARIES.
That partially explains why he’s such a control-freak (who, naturally, believes in galactic domination—by any means necessary); since after all let’s face it: if you don’t understand the importance of good fences, then you can’t be a good neighbor. (I say “partially” due to the nature of this “information—“ which I’ll explain at the conclusion.)
Basically, Mike Wong links to on SD.net, for all the world to see, the following page:
Here, his wife postures herself to the world with her experience as.. well there's just no other way to say it—his personal DILDO TEST-PILOT, even exposing the most personal information: you can see it for yourself right here
http://www.cheerfulatheist.com/SexToyReviews/
Now I'm as open-minded as anyone-- but I'm also mindful as to protocols of healthy boundaries and personal privacy and discreetness (as in MENTALLY healthy).
As such, it’s pretty obvious here that by calling himself "atheist," Wong is disguising his insecurity-based narcissism and-- let's face it-- EXHIBITIONISM-- as "open-mindedness," just like he disguises his obsessive pseudo-intellectual Warsie-behavior as simply rational responses of a superior intellect.
Now I'm not a psychologist, but I have experience with medical law-- and thus I know that someone is a pathological narcissist, when I see such an extreme example that a layman can tell that such exists, just like I don't need to be a coroner who examines the body, in order to know that a person jumping from the WTC is dead.
Clearly, we're not looking at just one pathological narcissist, but one in a co-dependent narcissistic relationship, bolstered by external "Yuppie" material quasi-success and education beyond high school, as if this qualifies as “bragging rights” to make claims about anyone and anything.
Literally, we're dealing not simply with an egotist, but literally with an unqualified egomaniac; when someone's wife exposes their sex-life to the world in the same anal-retentive way, literally calculating the volume of a giant sex-toy (and indirectly, the literal exact volume of her vagina), you KNOW you're not in Kansas anymore-- and you want to go home!
And here's a direct QUOTE from his OWN website (borrowed under Fair Use laws—or not, sue me):
Bam" from Doc Johnson
This is the third and biggest in my new set of huge toys. It's supposedly modeled after a real person, but a penis this large cannot achieve a full erection in real life, so this toy must have been extrapolated somewhat. Bam measures 9½" usable length (the same as John Holmes despite being longer because Bam has bigger balls) x 2.5" diameter (approx. 46½ in³). Note that the diameter is actually 2.7" at the thickest point along the shaft. The volume of his first 6" was actually measured to be roughly 500 mL, or 30½ in³, so Bam's true insertable volume is probably closer to 800 mL or 48½ in³: even larger than the calculated value!
Rebecca's Review: When I first saw this toy, my jaw literally dropped. I couldn't see any way that this would fit inside me. It did take some warming up, but I did get him inserted - and it still blows my mind that I was able to get about half of him inside me. Once I was able to get comfortable, I had a really good orgasm with this toy, but I think the size is excessive. I can have equally good orgasms with smaller toys. If the idea of a really big dildo turns you on (or your SO would get a thrill out of seeing you with such a huge dildo jammed up in you), then this one is for you. It is made of silicone, so it has a soft, yet firm texture. There is nothing particularly distinctive about Bam except for his size. As I said above, if really big toys get you wet, then try this one on for size. For everybody else, you can get equal pleasure from something smaller.
Update (Feb 2008): It has been roughly 10 months since I wrote this review, and while I initially didn't think I'd see much of Bam in the future, he has turned out to be a fairly regular visitor to the Maison De Rebecca. As it turns out, it's not quite true that I have equally good orgasms with smaller toys. It seems that I'm a bit of a size queen after all, and Bam's mammoth size gives me something that smaller toys just can't offer. The orgasms are just a little bit more powerful, and the feeling is unique. But it is a lot of work to get Bam in there, and I'm lazy, so it just doesn't seem worth it. If it weren't for the fact that Mike gets a particular gleam in his eye watching me take Bam, I would probably not use him despite the extra-powerful orgasm.
And if this isn't enough:
Size Chart
The following chart depicts the usable volumes for the toys reviewed on this page. "Usable volume" is the volume (in cubic inches) of the first 6" of the toy's length (or less, if the toy is not that long). The rationale behind this measurement is that it is difficult and/or painful to insert more than 6" of sex toy into you, especially since sex toys are not as flexible as a human penis. Toys which are long and thin may look impressive, but you won't feel it. By measuring the volume of the first 6", we can get a pretty good idea of how big a toy will really feel when you try to use it.
[And ironically, here’s the most interesting—and telling—excerpt:]
”Mike took all of the measurements himself with a tape measure, rather than relying on the manufacturer's claims (which, as we shall see, are often inaccurate). For the larger toys, Mike actually submerged them in water to directly measure their volume instead of calculating it from the length and width, but only for the first 6" of length.”
If I didn't link to this from Mike's own site, I'd swear that this was a sick parody dreamed up by someone with a REALLY mean sense of humor, who REALLY hated him, and who wanted to satire the idea of how his anal-retentive, pseudo-intellectual application of engineering carries over to his family and sex-life like, just Mike does to fantasy-movies.
And likewise, I’d think that this was entirely inappropriate and excessive—but not without some poetic justice, seeing as how Mike’s psychotic behavior includes illegally defaming, publishing, and exposing people’s private lives in order to get back at them for daring to disagree about fictitious topics.
But sadly, such is not the case: this is an ACTUAL, BONA FIDE WEBSITE, and I'm telling you that we're dealing with a couple of sick, egocentristic and narcissistic puppies here, exposing their names, faces, most intimate parts of their personal lives to the world for attention-- and doing so from the same pseudo-intellectually pretentious quantitative argumentats that we know too well from Mike's Warsie rants.
I just feel sorry for his kids- I have a feeling they'll likewise be average-eduated but will go broke for medical expenses on therapy and anti-psychotic medications due to being exposed to such obsessive compensation and denial of their own real-world mediocrity, leading to similar obnoxious and psychotic behavior.
As a result, I wouldn't touch this guy (Mike) with a 10-foot lightsaber; he's literally got some serious mental problems, and his obsession with "SW is God" is symptomatic behavior in how he actually identifies with the subject-matter to the point where he blurs fantasy with reality, and so is literally fighting to preserve his illusion by forcing others to agree with him by any means necessary.
I don't want to bring up the obvious "Freud" implications, but it's pretty clear from this page that he's COMPENSATING for something... or lack thereof; in the movie, didn't Darth lose his weenie too?
I'd ask "just how small is it, Mike?" but I don't want him to start something I have no desire to see finished.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, I also hate to think of this entire debate ending, by finding out a miserable irony, that the entire Warsie cult is based on such a sad and over-used cliche as "Penis Envy;" but here, it seems there's just no denying it-- and the above "chart" is proof-positive. If this was a movie, I'd demand my money back for such a sad, cliche'd , disappointing and TINY ending after such a huge buildup (no pun intended, but I'll take credit for it anyway).
It's like "Return of the Jedi" ending by some "big revelation" of seeing the Emperor naked-- and that he's got NOTHING to show for it, and everyone just laughs him into jumping into the reactor.
Case closed.
I've just found some troubling but explanatory information-- or should I say TOO MUCH information—about Mike “Darth” Wong. Basically,we're dealing with a pathological narcissist here-- I'm talking certifiable, NOT just a slightly "eccentric genius" (like he thinks he is).
I always wondered at Mike’s claim, that anyone who disagreed with him without submitting personal information regarding their name, rank, serial number, picture, and credentials, was a “coward—“ particularly when he would resort to devoting entire pages to publicly exposing and defaming people’s private lives in his geek’s “Sith-revenge.” After all, an argument should stand on its own merits; and it’s obvious to any normal person (emphasis on normal”), that a person would want to be able to participate in an on-line debate, without exposing themselves to public personal attack via defamation and invasions of privacy in their personal lives and information, to every sicko out there-- including being targeted by their harassment and death-threats etc… particularly by people who are typically so mentally unstable that they can’t discern reality from fiction (i.e. the typical “Warsie” mentality).
However now this begins to make sense why Mike wouldn’t understand why a person would want to maingain privacy and personal boundaries:
MIKE WONG DOESN’T UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPTS OF PRIVACY AND PERSONAL BOUNDARIES.
That partially explains why he’s such a control-freak (who, naturally, believes in galactic domination—by any means necessary); since after all let’s face it: if you don’t understand the importance of good fences, then you can’t be a good neighbor. (I say “partially” due to the nature of this “information—“ which I’ll explain at the conclusion.)
Basically, Mike Wong links to on SD.net, for all the world to see, the following page:
Here, his wife postures herself to the world with her experience as.. well there's just no other way to say it—his personal DILDO TEST-PILOT, even exposing the most personal information: you can see it for yourself right here
http://www.cheerfulatheist.com/SexToyReviews/
Now I'm as open-minded as anyone-- but I'm also mindful as to protocols of healthy boundaries and personal privacy and discreetness (as in MENTALLY healthy).
As such, it’s pretty obvious here that by calling himself "atheist," Wong is disguising his insecurity-based narcissism and-- let's face it-- EXHIBITIONISM-- as "open-mindedness," just like he disguises his obsessive pseudo-intellectual Warsie-behavior as simply rational responses of a superior intellect.
Now I'm not a psychologist, but I have experience with medical law-- and thus I know that someone is a pathological narcissist, when I see such an extreme example that a layman can tell that such exists, just like I don't need to be a coroner who examines the body, in order to know that a person jumping from the WTC is dead.
Clearly, we're not looking at just one pathological narcissist, but one in a co-dependent narcissistic relationship, bolstered by external "Yuppie" material quasi-success and education beyond high school, as if this qualifies as “bragging rights” to make claims about anyone and anything.
Literally, we're dealing not simply with an egotist, but literally with an unqualified egomaniac; when someone's wife exposes their sex-life to the world in the same anal-retentive way, literally calculating the volume of a giant sex-toy (and indirectly, the literal exact volume of her vagina), you KNOW you're not in Kansas anymore-- and you want to go home!
And here's a direct QUOTE from his OWN website (borrowed under Fair Use laws—or not, sue me):
Bam" from Doc Johnson
This is the third and biggest in my new set of huge toys. It's supposedly modeled after a real person, but a penis this large cannot achieve a full erection in real life, so this toy must have been extrapolated somewhat. Bam measures 9½" usable length (the same as John Holmes despite being longer because Bam has bigger balls) x 2.5" diameter (approx. 46½ in³). Note that the diameter is actually 2.7" at the thickest point along the shaft. The volume of his first 6" was actually measured to be roughly 500 mL, or 30½ in³, so Bam's true insertable volume is probably closer to 800 mL or 48½ in³: even larger than the calculated value!
Rebecca's Review: When I first saw this toy, my jaw literally dropped. I couldn't see any way that this would fit inside me. It did take some warming up, but I did get him inserted - and it still blows my mind that I was able to get about half of him inside me. Once I was able to get comfortable, I had a really good orgasm with this toy, but I think the size is excessive. I can have equally good orgasms with smaller toys. If the idea of a really big dildo turns you on (or your SO would get a thrill out of seeing you with such a huge dildo jammed up in you), then this one is for you. It is made of silicone, so it has a soft, yet firm texture. There is nothing particularly distinctive about Bam except for his size. As I said above, if really big toys get you wet, then try this one on for size. For everybody else, you can get equal pleasure from something smaller.
Update (Feb 2008): It has been roughly 10 months since I wrote this review, and while I initially didn't think I'd see much of Bam in the future, he has turned out to be a fairly regular visitor to the Maison De Rebecca. As it turns out, it's not quite true that I have equally good orgasms with smaller toys. It seems that I'm a bit of a size queen after all, and Bam's mammoth size gives me something that smaller toys just can't offer. The orgasms are just a little bit more powerful, and the feeling is unique. But it is a lot of work to get Bam in there, and I'm lazy, so it just doesn't seem worth it. If it weren't for the fact that Mike gets a particular gleam in his eye watching me take Bam, I would probably not use him despite the extra-powerful orgasm.
And if this isn't enough:
Size Chart
The following chart depicts the usable volumes for the toys reviewed on this page. "Usable volume" is the volume (in cubic inches) of the first 6" of the toy's length (or less, if the toy is not that long). The rationale behind this measurement is that it is difficult and/or painful to insert more than 6" of sex toy into you, especially since sex toys are not as flexible as a human penis. Toys which are long and thin may look impressive, but you won't feel it. By measuring the volume of the first 6", we can get a pretty good idea of how big a toy will really feel when you try to use it.
[And ironically, here’s the most interesting—and telling—excerpt:]
”Mike took all of the measurements himself with a tape measure, rather than relying on the manufacturer's claims (which, as we shall see, are often inaccurate). For the larger toys, Mike actually submerged them in water to directly measure their volume instead of calculating it from the length and width, but only for the first 6" of length.”
If I didn't link to this from Mike's own site, I'd swear that this was a sick parody dreamed up by someone with a REALLY mean sense of humor, who REALLY hated him, and who wanted to satire the idea of how his anal-retentive, pseudo-intellectual application of engineering carries over to his family and sex-life like, just Mike does to fantasy-movies.
And likewise, I’d think that this was entirely inappropriate and excessive—but not without some poetic justice, seeing as how Mike’s psychotic behavior includes illegally defaming, publishing, and exposing people’s private lives in order to get back at them for daring to disagree about fictitious topics.
But sadly, such is not the case: this is an ACTUAL, BONA FIDE WEBSITE, and I'm telling you that we're dealing with a couple of sick, egocentristic and narcissistic puppies here, exposing their names, faces, most intimate parts of their personal lives to the world for attention-- and doing so from the same pseudo-intellectually pretentious quantitative argumentats that we know too well from Mike's Warsie rants.
I just feel sorry for his kids- I have a feeling they'll likewise be average-eduated but will go broke for medical expenses on therapy and anti-psychotic medications due to being exposed to such obsessive compensation and denial of their own real-world mediocrity, leading to similar obnoxious and psychotic behavior.
As a result, I wouldn't touch this guy (Mike) with a 10-foot lightsaber; he's literally got some serious mental problems, and his obsession with "SW is God" is symptomatic behavior in how he actually identifies with the subject-matter to the point where he blurs fantasy with reality, and so is literally fighting to preserve his illusion by forcing others to agree with him by any means necessary.
I don't want to bring up the obvious "Freud" implications, but it's pretty clear from this page that he's COMPENSATING for something... or lack thereof; in the movie, didn't Darth lose his weenie too?
I'd ask "just how small is it, Mike?" but I don't want him to start something I have no desire to see finished.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, I also hate to think of this entire debate ending, by finding out a miserable irony, that the entire Warsie cult is based on such a sad and over-used cliche as "Penis Envy;" but here, it seems there's just no denying it-- and the above "chart" is proof-positive. If this was a movie, I'd demand my money back for such a sad, cliche'd , disappointing and TINY ending after such a huge buildup (no pun intended, but I'll take credit for it anyway).
It's like "Return of the Jedi" ending by some "big revelation" of seeing the Emperor naked-- and that he's got NOTHING to show for it, and everyone just laughs him into jumping into the reactor.
Case closed.
