Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

More 9/11 conspiracies

Mentalist

Administrator
Staff member
http://911fraud.blogspot.com/


This is a very interesting site that really does have some blatnt information that is incredibly hard to deny.


Example:

IV. Evidence of Explosives


These are controlled demolitions of buildings using demolition charges..

zxsquibs1wv.jpg

zzzzsquibs0jq.jpg


Here are the squibs in the twin towers. You may note that the squibs appear smaller than those in the buildings above. This is not the case. The twin towers were just much larger structures. They were almost a quarter mile tall so the squibs appear small in comparison to the buildings.


zzzazaz7vj.jpg


zzsquibs1qx.jpg


The squibs were evenly placed all the way down the building. Watch the 2nd video down.


This is world trade center building 7 collapsing at 5:30 pm on 9/11. It was not even hit by a plane.


wtc-7_1_.gif


Larry Silverstein, the leaseholder of the building later admitted in a PBS documentary that they "pulled" building 7, a demoltion term for controlled demolition, even though it takes at least days to plant charges and there were small fires in the lower section of the building when it fell. They couldn't have moved explosives in before they put the fires out.

 
Bombs in the Building: World Trade Center 'Conspiracy Theory' is a Conspiracy Fact
http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_lavello_050503_bombs.html

By Randy Lavello

By now the misinformation and ignored findings surrounding the September 11, 2001 attacks have evaporated the official version into the land of fiction. Didn't it seem strange that we learned everything of the government version by the next day? Much has been learned about the attacks, yet the official version has never changed; it seems as though our government thinks the point moot since it used this excuse to pass unconstitutional laws and wage wars resulting in oil profits. The time has come to admit the sorry truth as a nation, so that we can move on - as a nation.


The planes did not bring those towers down; bombs did. So why use planes? It seems they were a diversionary tactic- a grand spectacle. Who would want to divert our attention from the real cause of the collapse of those towers? It must be those who benefited most from these attacks. Let's recount some facts of that dreadful day.


Any time an aircraft deviates from it's course, the air traffic controller requests a military intercept according to military response code 7610-4J. This was the first time interceptors were not sent up in the history of this policy. The intercept pilots are trained to make a visual check of the cockpit. could this be the reason these interceptors were intercepted? Planes were sent to the New York area, after unprecedented delay, from Falmouth, Massachusetts rather than nearby Ft. Dix or Laguardia. Of course, they didn't arrive in time - there was no visual scan of the cockpits.


Captain Kent Hill, retired from the Air Force, explained that the U.S. had flown unmanned aircraft, similar in size to a Boeing 737, on preprogrammed flight paths from Edwards Air Force Base, California to Australia on several occasions. He believes the airliners used in the attacks had their on board computers knocked out and were subsequently choreographed by an Airborne Warning and Control System. Along side Captain Hill, an Air Force officer with more than 100 sorties in Vietnam stated, 'Those birds either had a crack fighter pilot in the left seat, or they were being maneuvered by remote control.' We know that the technology exists to fly hijacked commercial airliners by remote control - it's called 'Globalhawk.' We also know that the military has had an unmanned drone aircraft known as the 'Predator,' since 1994. A saboteur would merely have to reprogram the controls to switch from manual to remote; those airliners practically fly themselves already with the autopilot. This would require electronic security codes. acquisition of electronic codes would also explain the lapse of interceptor response due to sabotage. Furthermore, it's a fact that Air Force One codes were known and punched in by a rogue source on 9/11, proving the presence of an inside, subversive element.

As usual, it's not a good conspiracy, if it doesn't involve a Bush! Introducing Marvin Bush - brother of George Jr. Marvin is a substantial shareholder and was on the Board of Directors until 2000 of a security company aptly named Securacom. This is not an ordinary security force with canvas badges and walkie-talkies; it's an electronic security company, which was 'coincidentally' involved with Dulles Airport until 1998. Handling electronic security at Dulles seems like an excellent way to gain access to Air Traffic Control communication codes with NORAD, which is in charge of intercept missions. According to CEO Barry McDaniel, the company 'handled some of the security at the World Trade Center up to the day the buildings fell down.' How convenient, huh? Bombs were in those towers. Bush's presidency was saved by these attacks - just something to think about.

Five of the twenty 'suicide hijackers' are alive and well according to the BBC and they want their names cleared. So who was flying those planes? We may never know exactly what happened with those jets; what we do know is that the official version crumbles under scrutiny. These planes were merely a diversion, as proven by the presence of bombs. that's right, PROVEN!


Before beginning this article, I met Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman and former Auxiliary Police Officer, Paul Isaac Jr. at the World Trade Center Memorial. Paul, along with many other firemen, is very upset about the obvious cover-up and he is on a crusade for answers and justice. He was stationed at Engine 10, across the street from the World Trade Center in 1998 and 99; Engine 10 was entirely wiped out in the destruction of the towers. He explained to me that, "many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they're afraid for their jobs to admit it because the 'higher-ups' forbid discussion of this fact." Paul further elaborated that former CIA director Robert Woolsey, as the Fire Department's Anti-terrorism Consultant, is sending a gag order down the ranks. "There were definitely bombs in those buildings," he told me. He explained to me that, if the building had 'pancaked' as it's been called, the falling floors would have met great resistance from the steel support columns, which would have sent debris flying outward into the surrounding blocks. I asked him about the trusses, and quoted the history channel's 'don't trust a truss' explanation for the collapses. He responded in disbelief, and told me, "You could never build a truss building that high. A slight wind would knock it over! Those buildings were supported by reinforced steel. Building don't just implode like that; this was a demolition."


Just after the disaster, Firefighter Louie Cacchioli said, "We think there were bombs set in the building." Notice he said 'we'. At 9:04, just after flight 175 collided with the South Tower, a huge explosion shot 550 feet into the air from the U.S. Customs House known as WTC 6. A huge crater scars the ground where this building once stood. Something blew up WTC 6 - it wasn't a plane; it must have been a bomb of some sort.


The seismic record from Columbia University's observatory in Palisades, NY (21 miles away) provides indisputable proof that massive explosions brought down those towers. At the precise moment the South Tower began collapsing, a 2.1 earthquake registered on the seismograph. At the precise moment the North Tower began collapsing, a 2.3 earthquake registered; however, as the buildings started to crumble these waves disappeared. The two 'spikes'on the seismograph, which both occurred at the exact instants the collapses began, are twenty times the amplitude, or more than 100 times the force of the other waves. If the buildings had simply collapsed, the largest jolts would have occurred when the massive debris struck the earth, not at the beginnings of the collapses. Seismologist Arthur Lerner-Lam of Columbia University stated, "Only a small fraction of the energy from the collapsing towers was converted into ground motion. The ground shaking that resulted from the collapse of the towers was extremely small." In other words, the collapsing did not cause 2.1 and 2.3 magnitude earthquakes. Furthermore, a 'sharp spike of short duration' is how underground nuclear explosions register on seismographs. Underground explosions, where the steel columns meet Manhattans granite would account for both the demolition-style implosions and these 'spikes' on the seismograph. Another seismologist at the Palisades observatory, Won Young Kim said the 1993 truck bomb did not even register on their seismographs because the explosion was 'not coupled' to the ground. Imagine the magnitude of explosions it would take to register the two earthquakes, when the truck bomb didn't even show up.


The American Free Press reported that in the basements of the collapsed towers, where 47 central support columns (per building) connected with the bedrock, hot spots of 'literally molten steel' were discovered more than a month after the attack. There is only one explanation for this: An explosion of unprecedented magnitude destroyed the bases of the columns, then the massive structures buried the impact points, trapping the intense heat below for all that time.


The tower which was struck second suffered less damage from the plane because it was a less direct hit and most of the jet fuel was seen ignited outside the structure. yet this tower collapsed first. Just before this collapse, the firefighters were up on the burning levels and were heard saying, "Battalion seven. Ladder fifteen, we've got two isolated pockets of fire. We should be able to knock it down with two lines." How could two isolated pockets of fire destroy the bases of the support columns causing the buildings to implode? Paul Isaac told me, "Based on video footage of the collapse of the South Tower, the structural collapse is not consistent with the angle the building was struck."


Why was no investigation permitted of the debris? Dr W. Gene Corley headed the FEMA sponsored engineering assessment of the World Trade Center collapse, which performed no tests on the steel for traces of explosives. When asked about this process known as 'twinning,' he responded, "I am not a metallurgist." Dr. Corley also 'investigated' the debris at Waco and Oklahoma City. and we all know how thoroughly those 'investigations' were performed.

No government agency performed forensic examinations of the rubble; no effort was made to validate their official story. The rubble was quickly =
loaded onto ships and delivered to China for smelting. These are the action=
s of criminals disposing of evidence! By these actions, FEMA proves itself =
to be a subversive element in our government!


Former Deputy Director of the FBI, John P. O'Neil stated, "The main obstacles to investigate Islamic terrorism were U.S. oil corporate interests and the role played by Saudi Arabia in it." Can you think of anyone (Bush) linked to both wealthy Saudi Arabians and U.S. corporate oil? John O'Neil resigned from the FBI after 31 years of service after Barbara Bodine, currently part of the Iraqi transition team, barred him from following up his investigation of the attack on the U.S.S Cole. He took a job heading security at the World Trade Center. his first day of work - September 11, 2001. John O'Neil received the job from Jerome Howard, Former Director of the New York Office of Emergency Management, who happened to have the day off on 9/11. We may only speculate on the case of Mr. O'Neil, but he does seem to be a person which U.S. oil corporate interests would want out of the way. especially during these wars for oil and power in Iraq and Afghanistan.


The top FBI officials in Minneapolis called off investigations of Zacarais Moussaoui, causing bitter resentment among field agents. The man who made the decision not to investigate was promoted! Israeli intelligence agents lived next to the alleged hijackers in Hollywood, Florida. The 'hijackers' were trained at U.S. government flight schools. Insider training on Uni=
ted Airlines leads to the conclusion that there was foreknowledge of these attacks; it also establishes that those with this foreknowledge are, at least, relatively wealthy. Another suspicious finding is that the World Trade Center was sold to Vornado Realty Trust in February, seven months prior to the attacks for 3.25 billion dollars. this doesn't prove anything, it's merely suspicious.


Who gained the most from the attacks of September 11th? Who had the motive? An Israeli expert on terrorism at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Ehud Sprinzak said, "From the perspective of Jews, it is the most important public relations act ever committed in our favor." David Stern, an expert on Israeli intelligence operations stated, "This attack required a high l=
evel of military precision and the resources of an advanced intelligence agency. In addition, the attackers would have needed to be extremely familiar with both Air Force One flight operations, civil airline flight paths, and aerial assault tactics on sensitive U.S. cities like Washington." He elaborated that the attacks "serve no Arab group or nation's interest, but their timing came in the midst of international condemnation of Israel." He goes on to claim "A U.S. military intelligence report revealed details of an international intelligence memo linking Mossad to the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks. The memo was in circulation three weeks before the attacks."

Furthering the suspicion of Mossad involvement, five Israelis were seen atop a van smiling and celebrating, while taking videos of the disaster from across the Hudson River. These five were arrested by the FBI and detained for two months before being deported back to Israel. Two of these men were positively identified as Israeli intelligence agents. Eighty-one nations are represented among the World Trade Center's dead - Israel is not one of these nations even though approximately 1200 of its citizens worked there. As if that wasn't enough, an instant messaging firm in Israel, named Odigo, received warnings about the towers two hours before the attacks. Everyone who points out the wrongdoings of Israel is immediately labeled 'anti-Semitic'. well, the truth knows no race or religion - it's just the truth. These aren't Jews carrying out these plans; it's merely sick animals who hide behind the Jews! =


WorldTradeCenter.com describes David Rockefeller as the 'Visionary behind the World Trade Center.' He pushed the construction of these towers through major opposition with the aid of his brother, then governor, Nelson Rockefeller. David has been quoted as saying, "We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order." Was this the 'right major crisis' to advance the aims of a global government?


There is overwhelming evidence to support the findings that these alleged Arab terrorists were merely scapegoats used to advance the World Government agend. During the attacks, 'President' George Jr. was reading a book with school children about goats! (Scapegoats?) Arab terrorists did not carry out these attacks which were detrimental to the Muslim world.


All evidence points to elements inside, high atop the governments of Israel and the United States. Those wishing to implement their world government through their control over finance, media and militaries are guilty of these most heinous crimes. This atrocity is proving to advance the domestic police state agendas and consolidate the Middle East's oil reserves. The people who most benefited from these attacks are the wealthiest, most privileged and powerful men on earth who feel they will finally be able to hold dominion over the nations of the world through their New World Order. For some of these globalists, these attacks were merely a means to an end - a huge step toward ruling a world socialist system. But for others, likely the planners of such a vile crime, this was a mass sacrifice to themselves. This mass ritual sacrifice of the vulnerable and the heroes who tried to save them was perpetrated by power crazed freaks who are simply - satanic.
 
Looks to me more like the stuff is falling down inside the building and getting blown out of windows that were already shattered previously by people jumping out.

The building 7 thing looks dodgy though.
 
I will ask anyone who is purely skeptical about the FACT that 9/11 is riddled with inconsitency and lies to check this out.

zzzloose5nm.gif


Loose Change 2nd Edition (Part 1)


Loose Change 2nd Edition (Part 2)


Loose Change 2nd Edition (Part 3)
"Loose Change 2nd Edition" is the follow-up to the most provocative 9-11 documentary on the market today. This film shows direct connection between the attacks of September 11, 2001 and the United States government. Evidence is derived from news footage, scientific fact, and most important, Americans who suffered through that tragic day.



Watch it then get back to me on what you believe.
 
You know what? You might be safe way over there wherever the hell you are; but I live in the USA and if you put this stuff all over the board I will not feel safe coming here. Can't you at least post it all in pig latin or something? I don't want to be flagged.
 
Okay, so I from here on out believe with all my heart and mind that Mentalist has gone mental (oijsere) and is unable to post a legitimate idea.

LIES, LIES.
 
The illuminati control your ability to be objective in a subject that requires and begs for proper scrutiny and one that has overwhelming evidence conteracting the official stance that hasn't been changed once since the same day as the attacks.

Nice.
 
MORE LIES FROM THE MENTAL(ist).

Actually, I believe that James Joyce and Albert Einstein were able to solve that illuminati problem once and for all.

After the China/spy plane incident I stuck my head in the sand where it will firmly remain.
 
Watch Loose Change. It is undeniable in some of it's findings. Whether you choose to believe all of it or even only some of it. If you choose to understand that things went down in a very strange manner that day and that the public has never been given a satisfactory explanantion for any of the inconsitencies and that the 911 commision is a joke unto itself is your own buisness.

Though it seems like you have more paranoia issues than I have as it stands.
 
I've always thought that from the day after (possibly the day of, I don't remember for sure). A very dangerous sentiment. I started to watch that documentary, but after about five minutes I decided that I'd probably get flagged if I watched much more so I pulled the plug on my computer. Anyone with brains already knew the gist of all that just being around for the incident, there's no reason to draw attention to yourself by pointing out/digging up facts. You're a dirty liar Mentalist, and I'll never believe a word you post from now on. It figures, though. Your country is against the US policy of freedom, and you are just an unwitting pawn for your oppressive government. But do not worry, some day when we are less busy we will go over there and fix all of your problems, since you are clearly incapable of doing it yourself.

God Bless.
 
You fucking Americans are stupid. Muslims run around saying 'we didn't do it, the Zionists of Israel did it'. This had you questioning actually video footage. Get fucking real. It was Muslim psycho terrorists. No one else. Yes, there were interceptors in the skies. Right after the two planes crashed into the towers. You and your stupid fucking conspiracy theories. You actually believe your own government would do this to their own people? Fuck you are all dumber than our Canadian logs.
 
Mentalist said:
Bombs in the Building: World Trade Center 'Conspiracy Theory' is a Conspiracy Fact
http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_lavello_050503_bombs.html

By Randy Lavello

By now the misinformation and ignored findings surrounding the September 11, 2001 attacks have evaporated the official version into the land of fiction. Didn't it seem strange that we learned everything of the government version by the next day? Much has been learned about the attacks, yet the official version has never changed; it seems as though our government thinks the point moot since it used this excuse to pass unconstitutional laws and wage wars resulting in oil profits. The time has come to admit the sorry truth as a nation, so that we can move on - as a nation.


The planes did not bring those towers down; bombs did. So why use planes? It seems they were a diversionary tactic- a grand spectacle. Who would want to divert our attention from the real cause of the collapse of those towers? It must be those who benefited most from these attacks. Let's recount some facts of that dreadful day.


Any time an aircraft deviates from it's course, the air traffic controller requests a military intercept according to military response code 7610-4J. This was the first time interceptors were not sent up in the history of this policy. The intercept pilots are trained to make a visual check of the cockpit. could this be the reason these interceptors were intercepted? Planes were sent to the New York area, after unprecedented delay, from Falmouth, Massachusetts rather than nearby Ft. Dix or Laguardia. Of course, they didn't arrive in time - there was no visual scan of the cockpits.


Captain Kent Hill, retired from the Air Force, explained that the U.S. had flown unmanned aircraft, similar in size to a Boeing 737, on preprogrammed flight paths from Edwards Air Force Base, California to Australia on several occasions. He believes the airliners used in the attacks had their on board computers knocked out and were subsequently choreographed by an Airborne Warning and Control System. Along side Captain Hill, an Air Force officer with more than 100 sorties in Vietnam stated, 'Those birds either had a crack fighter pilot in the left seat, or they were being maneuvered by remote control.' We know that the technology exists to fly hijacked commercial airliners by remote control - it's called 'Globalhawk.' We also know that the military has had an unmanned drone aircraft known as the 'Predator,' since 1994. A saboteur would merely have to reprogram the controls to switch from manual to remote; those airliners practically fly themselves already with the autopilot. This would require electronic security codes. acquisition of electronic codes would also explain the lapse of interceptor response due to sabotage. Furthermore, it's a fact that Air Force One codes were known and punched in by a rogue source on 9/11, proving the presence of an inside, subversive element.

As usual, it's not a good conspiracy, if it doesn't involve a Bush! Introducing Marvin Bush - brother of George Jr. Marvin is a substantial shareholder and was on the Board of Directors until 2000 of a security company aptly named Securacom. This is not an ordinary security force with canvas badges and walkie-talkies; it's an electronic security company, which was 'coincidentally' involved with Dulles Airport until 1998. Handling electronic security at Dulles seems like an excellent way to gain access to Air Traffic Control communication codes with NORAD, which is in charge of intercept missions. According to CEO Barry McDaniel, the company 'handled some of the security at the World Trade Center up to the day the buildings fell down.' How convenient, huh? Bombs were in those towers. Bush's presidency was saved by these attacks - just something to think about.

Five of the twenty 'suicide hijackers' are alive and well according to the BBC and they want their names cleared. So who was flying those planes? We may never know exactly what happened with those jets; what we do know is that the official version crumbles under scrutiny. These planes were merely a diversion, as proven by the presence of bombs. that's right, PROVEN!


Before beginning this article, I met Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman and former Auxiliary Police Officer, Paul Isaac Jr. at the World Trade Center Memorial. Paul, along with many other firemen, is very upset about the obvious cover-up and he is on a crusade for answers and justice. He was stationed at Engine 10, across the street from the World Trade Center in 1998 and 99; Engine 10 was entirely wiped out in the destruction of the towers. He explained to me that, "many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they're afraid for their jobs to admit it because the 'higher-ups' forbid discussion of this fact." Paul further elaborated that former CIA director Robert Woolsey, as the Fire Department's Anti-terrorism Consultant, is sending a gag order down the ranks. "There were definitely bombs in those buildings," he told me. He explained to me that, if the building had 'pancaked' as it's been called, the falling floors would have met great resistance from the steel support columns, which would have sent debris flying outward into the surrounding blocks. I asked him about the trusses, and quoted the history channel's 'don't trust a truss' explanation for the collapses. He responded in disbelief, and told me, "You could never build a truss building that high. A slight wind would knock it over! Those buildings were supported by reinforced steel. Building don't just implode like that; this was a demolition."


Just after the disaster, Firefighter Louie Cacchioli said, "We think there were bombs set in the building." Notice he said 'we'. At 9:04, just after flight 175 collided with the South Tower, a huge explosion shot 550 feet into the air from the U.S. Customs House known as WTC 6. A huge crater scars the ground where this building once stood. Something blew up WTC 6 - it wasn't a plane; it must have been a bomb of some sort.


The seismic record from Columbia University's observatory in Palisades, NY (21 miles away) provides indisputable proof that massive explosions brought down those towers. At the precise moment the South Tower began collapsing, a 2.1 earthquake registered on the seismograph. At the precise moment the North Tower began collapsing, a 2.3 earthquake registered; however, as the buildings started to crumble these waves disappeared. The two 'spikes'on the seismograph, which both occurred at the exact instants the collapses began, are twenty times the amplitude, or more than 100 times the force of the other waves. If the buildings had simply collapsed, the largest jolts would have occurred when the massive debris struck the earth, not at the beginnings of the collapses. Seismologist Arthur Lerner-Lam of Columbia University stated, "Only a small fraction of the energy from the collapsing towers was converted into ground motion. The ground shaking that resulted from the collapse of the towers was extremely small." In other words, the collapsing did not cause 2.1 and 2.3 magnitude earthquakes. Furthermore, a 'sharp spike of short duration' is how underground nuclear explosions register on seismographs. Underground explosions, where the steel columns meet Manhattans granite would account for both the demolition-style implosions and these 'spikes' on the seismograph. Another seismologist at the Palisades observatory, Won Young Kim said the 1993 truck bomb did not even register on their seismographs because the explosion was 'not coupled' to the ground. Imagine the magnitude of explosions it would take to register the two earthquakes, when the truck bomb didn't even show up.


The American Free Press reported that in the basements of the collapsed towers, where 47 central support columns (per building) connected with the bedrock, hot spots of 'literally molten steel' were discovered more than a month after the attack. There is only one explanation for this: An explosion of unprecedented magnitude destroyed the bases of the columns, then the massive structures buried the impact points, trapping the intense heat below for all that time.


The tower which was struck second suffered less damage from the plane because it was a less direct hit and most of the jet fuel was seen ignited outside the structure. yet this tower collapsed first. Just before this collapse, the firefighters were up on the burning levels and were heard saying, "Battalion seven. Ladder fifteen, we've got two isolated pockets of fire. We should be able to knock it down with two lines." How could two isolated pockets of fire destroy the bases of the support columns causing the buildings to implode? Paul Isaac told me, "Based on video footage of the collapse of the South Tower, the structural collapse is not consistent with the angle the building was struck."


Why was no investigation permitted of the debris? Dr W. Gene Corley headed the FEMA sponsored engineering assessment of the World Trade Center collapse, which performed no tests on the steel for traces of explosives. When asked about this process known as 'twinning,' he responded, "I am not a metallurgist." Dr. Corley also 'investigated' the debris at Waco and Oklahoma City. and we all know how thoroughly those 'investigations' were performed.

No government agency performed forensic examinations of the rubble; no effort was made to validate their official story. The rubble was quickly =
loaded onto ships and delivered to China for smelting. These are the action=
s of criminals disposing of evidence! By these actions, FEMA proves itself =
to be a subversive element in our government!


Former Deputy Director of the FBI, John P. O'Neil stated, "The main obstacles to investigate Islamic terrorism were U.S. oil corporate interests and the role played by Saudi Arabia in it." Can you think of anyone (Bush) linked to both wealthy Saudi Arabians and U.S. corporate oil? John O'Neil resigned from the FBI after 31 years of service after Barbara Bodine, currently part of the Iraqi transition team, barred him from following up his investigation of the attack on the U.S.S Cole. He took a job heading security at the World Trade Center. his first day of work - September 11, 2001. John O'Neil received the job from Jerome Howard, Former Director of the New York Office of Emergency Management, who happened to have the day off on 9/11. We may only speculate on the case of Mr. O'Neil, but he does seem to be a person which U.S. oil corporate interests would want out of the way. especially during these wars for oil and power in Iraq and Afghanistan.


The top FBI officials in Minneapolis called off investigations of Zacarais Moussaoui, causing bitter resentment among field agents. The man who made the decision not to investigate was promoted! Israeli intelligence agents lived next to the alleged hijackers in Hollywood, Florida. The 'hijackers' were trained at U.S. government flight schools. Insider training on Uni=
ted Airlines leads to the conclusion that there was foreknowledge of these attacks; it also establishes that those with this foreknowledge are, at least, relatively wealthy. Another suspicious finding is that the World Trade Center was sold to Vornado Realty Trust in February, seven months prior to the attacks for 3.25 billion dollars. this doesn't prove anything, it's merely suspicious.


Who gained the most from the attacks of September 11th? Who had the motive? An Israeli expert on terrorism at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Ehud Sprinzak said, "From the perspective of Jews, it is the most important public relations act ever committed in our favor." David Stern, an expert on Israeli intelligence operations stated, "This attack required a high l=
evel of military precision and the resources of an advanced intelligence agency. In addition, the attackers would have needed to be extremely familiar with both Air Force One flight operations, civil airline flight paths, and aerial assault tactics on sensitive U.S. cities like Washington." He elaborated that the attacks "serve no Arab group or nation's interest, but their timing came in the midst of international condemnation of Israel." He goes on to claim "A U.S. military intelligence report revealed details of an international intelligence memo linking Mossad to the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks. The memo was in circulation three weeks before the attacks."

Furthering the suspicion of Mossad involvement, five Israelis were seen atop a van smiling and celebrating, while taking videos of the disaster from across the Hudson River. These five were arrested by the FBI and detained for two months before being deported back to Israel. Two of these men were positively identified as Israeli intelligence agents. Eighty-one nations are represented among the World Trade Center's dead - Israel is not one of these nations even though approximately 1200 of its citizens worked there. As if that wasn't enough, an instant messaging firm in Israel, named Odigo, received warnings about the towers two hours before the attacks. Everyone who points out the wrongdoings of Israel is immediately labeled 'anti-Semitic'. well, the truth knows no race or religion - it's just the truth. These aren't Jews carrying out these plans; it's merely sick animals who hide behind the Jews! =


WorldTradeCenter.com describes David Rockefeller as the 'Visionary behind the World Trade Center.' He pushed the construction of these towers through major opposition with the aid of his brother, then governor, Nelson Rockefeller. David has been quoted as saying, "We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order." Was this the 'right major crisis' to advance the aims of a global government?


There is overwhelming evidence to support the findings that these alleged Arab terrorists were merely scapegoats used to advance the World Government agend. During the attacks, 'President' George Jr. was reading a book with school children about goats! (Scapegoats?) Arab terrorists did not carry out these attacks which were detrimental to the Muslim world.


All evidence points to elements inside, high atop the governments of Israel and the United States. Those wishing to implement their world government through their control over finance, media and militaries are guilty of these most heinous crimes. This atrocity is proving to advance the domestic police state agendas and consolidate the Middle East's oil reserves. The people who most benefited from these attacks are the wealthiest, most privileged and powerful men on earth who feel they will finally be able to hold dominion over the nations of the world through their New World Order. For some of these globalists, these attacks were merely a means to an end - a huge step toward ruling a world socialist system. But for others, likely the planners of such a vile crime, this was a mass sacrifice to themselves. This mass ritual sacrifice of the vulnerable and the heroes who tried to save them was perpetrated by power crazed freaks who are simply - satanic.

So the Al Qaida documents discovered by Canadian soldiers are not real? Remember, they were CANADIAN. I know because I read about the discovery the next day in my daily newspaper. Oh yes, I am Canadian by the way. So your conspiracy theories are full of shit. Also, why would Al Qaida ADMIT to the bombings if it really was a 'government conspiracy'? Stupid fuck.
 
Why would conspirators want to use two planes AND bombs to take down the towers? Why the need for overkill????? Planting bombs in the two towers would be a moot point. Fuck you are stupid.
 
Let me guess, the plane that flew into the Pentagon? Another part of your US government plot? The USA would place the heart of its own military in danger? What a fucking MORON. MENTALLY-RETARDED is his true name. Why am I not surprised you sport a photo of your child-molesting hero Michael Jackson as your avatar??
 
You fucking Americans are stupid.

I'm not American you twat.

Muslims run around saying 'we didn't do it, the Zionists of Israel did it'. This had you questioning actually video footage. Get fucking real. It was Muslim psycho terrorists. No one else.

Wrong.

Yes, there were interceptors in the skies. Right after the two planes crashed into the towers.


There were fourteen planes defending the entire United States on the morning of 9/11. The rest were on "war games" excersises hundreds of nautical miles away from Washington and the rest were up in your oh so precious Canada doing yet more War Games. That's convienient isn't it.

You actually believe your own government would do this to their own people?

Flase Flag Terrorism isn't a new idea. It's been proposed byt the higher ups in relation to Cuba and god knows how many other times. Yes I do believe the people who have the power in the federal goverment would do this if the gains were great enough. The only way for neocon's to get their wars and the start of the police state they so want is by causing an outrage big enough to shake hearts and minds into getting angry and scared enough that they feel like they need these nutters to save them. They provide the problem and then the solution that happens to be what they wanted from the start and they make the public go along with it.


Oh yes, I am Canadian by the way. So your conspiracy theories are full of shit.

That is damning evidence you have there! :roll:

The video of Bin Laden planning the attacks is a laughable fake.The video is grainy and his face is the wrong shape (much broader) he is also wearing a gold ring (illegal by islamic law) and is seen writing with his right hand even though www.fbi.gov tells us that Bin Laden is left handed.

Why would conspirators want to use two planes AND bombs to take down the towers?

Because the planes on their own would never have brought down the towers you moron. No skyscraper in HISTORY has ever collapsed due to fire until 9/11 when the twin towers and WTC7 all collapsed. Hell WTC7 wasn't even hit by a fucking plane.

Let me guess, the plane that flew into the Pentagon? Another part of your US government plot?

I seriously doubt a plane even hit the Pentagon.

Another part of your US government plot?

I'm not American

The USA would place the heart of its own military in danger?

True or not is irrelevant INTELLIGENT people can still see the apparant motives for the actions. Clearly you're too dense to figure it out.

MENTALLY-RETARDED is his true name.

Is this the best parody of my name you can come up with? Weak.


Why am I not surprised you sport a photo of your child-molesting hero Michael Jackson as your avatar??


Never heard that one before.


The fact here is clear that you are just not intelligent enough to argue this with. True or not (oh which I am 95% sure it is) is really very irrelevant. You don't have a grasp on possible political gains and agendas to discuss this point with. The fact that you cannot even objectivley attempt to debunk this is laughable.

Here is a simple one for you:

How did the passengers on the planes phone people from their mobile phones at 32,000 feet. And when was the last time you introduced yourself to a family memeber on the phone with your first and last names?

How was a paper passport of one of the terrorists recovered from Ground Zero and still readable? Was he issued a titanium passport?

Thats just for starters. You obviously didn't watch Loose Change and you have debunked nothing in your four consecutive posts.

Try, try, try again...
 
Top