Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Nigger Riots In Toledo

The Question said:
Which version? There are lots of dialects of racist, you know.


Mayhap you didn't notice the sign over the front door.

Oh I know where I'm at, still doesn't justify being a racist. Nothing does.
 
Chadarnook said:
Division? People divide because they often prefer to be around people who resemble themselves.

Right, so let's just put up a chain link fence around "our own people," whatever that means.

Hate? Ever think that some aspects stem from a love for their own people?

Some aspects of hate = love? That's not love, that's insecurity. Real love is blind, not segmented into neat little packages of who looks like who.


White gang violence?

Yes, peek your head out from behind your hood, there is such things as white gangs, ever hear of the skin heads? But of course they're just misunderstood right?
 
Atomic Weggie said:
Oh I know where I'm at, still doesn't justify being a racist. Nothing does.

Well, that sounds an awful lot like a generalization, to me. And racism is wrong why, again? (That's a trick question, in case you couldn't guess.)
 
Chadarnook said:
Define racism.

Go on.

Main Entry: rac·ism
Pronunciation: 'rA-"si-z&m also -"shi-
Function: noun
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
2 : racial prejudice or discrimination


I'm sure you knew where to look.
 
Atomic Weggie said:
Right, so let's just put up a chain link fence around "our own people," whatever that means.

You know what it means, of course, or you wouldn't have said it. I hope.

Some aspects of hate = love? That's not love, that's insecurity. Real love is blind, not segmented into neat little packages of who looks like who.

Would you hate someone if they hurt someone you love?

Yes, peek your head out from behind your hood, there is such things as white gangs, ever hear of the skin heads? But of course they're just misunderstood right?

No, those are gangs -- some of them -- but they weren't the ones rioting in Toledo, were they?

Oh. 14,000th post. :)
 
So, please excuse me for butting in, how does that apply to "nigger" as the perjorative, as opposed to the way it's clearly being used here.

You were fucking ignorant in another thread too, bungie n00b
 
Atomic Weggie said:
Right, so let's just put up a chain link fence around "our own people," whatever that means.

Exactly. It's "our own people's" choice.


Some aspects of hate = love? That's not love, that's insecurity. Real love is blind, not segmented into neat little packages of who looks like who.

So, I take it your into Polygomy?

Just because I love my people doesn't mean I hate other peoples.




Yes, peek your head out from behind your hood, there is such things as white gangs, ever hear of the skin heads?

Behind my hood? You stupid little twat. I go to a college with mostly black people, and we get along just fine. I even tutor them.

You have any idea how terrifying it was to go to a public school in my early years? I would have prayed for some skinheads to attend with me.


But of course they're just misunderstood right?

For the most part. Though I don't really care for their image, I don't see them organizing crime on the level of other racial gangs.
 
The Question said:
You know what it means, of course, or you wouldn't have said it. I hope.


Would you hate someone if they hurt someone you love?

I would hate THAT PERSON, not their entire race. See, I view each person on their own merits, not their entire race. If a white person hurt someone you love, would you then hate yourself? Doesn't make a lot of sense does it? So why do that with other races? Why not judge each person depending on their merits and actions?


No, those are gangs -- some of them -- but they weren't the ones rioting in Toledo, were they?

Oh. 14,000th post. :)

But if the skinheads rioted, would the Nazi's protest? No need to answer, purely rhetorical.
 
Atomic Weggie said:
Main Entry: rac·ism
Pronunciation: 'rA-"si-z&m also -"shi-
Function: noun
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
2 : racial prejudice or discrimination


I'm sure you knew where to look.

For examples, see:


The Uhuru Movement (Black on White racism)

The Jewish Defense League (Jewish on Gentile racism)

MeCHA (Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan -- Hispanic on White racism.)

Samurai Spirits (Japanese National Socialism -- the site's in Japanese only beyond the flash intro, so it's hard to tell who they "hate", but one would imagine that gaijin would be considered non-citizens at worst if the Japanese variety follows the German model. If, on the other hand, the Japanese have taken their conception of National Socialism's views regarding minorities from the American cultural caricature of German National Socialism, gaijin could be in for far worse handling.)

Every race has its racists, and you'd do well to remember that before passing summary judgement on someone for doing nothing worse than you'd approve of someone else doing to him.
 
Atomic Weggie said:
I would hate THAT PERSON, not their entire race. See, I view each person on their own merits, not their entire race. If a white person hurt someone you love, would you then hate yourself? Doesn't make a lot of sense does it? So why do that with other races? Why not judge each person depending on their merits and actions?

Because some actions can logically be expected of certain groups. You know I'm right about this, if you think about it. Would you introduce a gay friend to a Southern Baptist preacher? If not, why not? Because you have every reason to expect that Southern Baptist preacher to have a certain attitude about your friend. And you also know that the majority -- no, not all, but the majority -- of Southern Baptist preachers are going to give a gay person a hard time. Why? Because that's part of being a Southern Baptist preacher.

But if the skinheads rioted, would the Nazi's protest? No need to answer, purely rhetorical.

That sounds oddly like a Zen riddle, for some reason. They went there to protest racism, whether you're able to see that or not. Black-on-white racism in the form of the crime black gangs were committing against white residents in the neighborhoods, and institutional racism on the part of police who didn't think the issue pressing enough to take effective action against it.
 
The Question said:
Would you introduce a gay friend to a Southern Baptist preacher? If not, why not?

I'm a Catholic Question, and my church has many gays who are contributing members of our community. They serve communion, they lecture, they help with relgious education classes for children *GASP* (they're around children!). Why? Because they are good people. But this goes against the bible and against most religious ways of thinking? But our priest is smart enough to see past their sexual preference and see what good people they are.

To answer your question, I would hope that the Baptist preacher would accept anyone, no matter who they are. If not, then are they really men of God?

That sounds oddly like a Zen riddle, for some reason. They went there to protest racism, whether you're able to see that or not.

You really beleive that huh? They were there to protest BLACK crime and to espouse their points of view for segregation. "See what happens when we let those darn blacks into our white neighborhoods!" Again, skinheads getting into trouble?, they wouldn't be anywhere near Ohio.
 
Atomic Weggie said:
I'm a Catholic Question, and my church has many gays who are contributing members of our community. They serve communion, they lecture, they help with relgious education classes for children *GASP* (they're around children!). Why? Because they are good people. But this goes against the bible and against most religious ways of thinking? But our priest is smart enough to see past their sexual preference and see what good people they are.

Apples and Oranges.

To answer your question, I would hope that the Baptist preacher would accept anyone, no matter who they are. If not, then are they really men of God?

You would hope -- but would you expect?

You really beleive that huh? They were there to protest BLACK crime and to espouse their points of view for segregation. "See what happens when we let those darn blacks into our white neighborhoods!"

And their point was roundly proven, wasn't it?

Again, skinheads getting into trouble?, they wouldn't be anywhere near Ohio.

Probably not, because you're forgetting the second thing they were protesting -- police apathy in enforcing the law on behalf of white residents. Tell me you think the police would let skinheads get away with anything, when those same police actually violated those Nazis' First Amendment right to peacably assemble.
 
The Question said:
Every race has its racists, and you'd do well to remember that before passing summary judgement on someone for doing nothing worse than you'd approve of someone else doing to him.

Don't know how I missed this little nugget. I agree that every race has it's racists, but all racism is wrong and until we ALL realize that, we'll never see peace.

I would never approve of unsubstantiated racial violence, no matter which side of the fence it comes from.
 
Atomic Weggie said:
Don't know how I missed this little nugget. I agree that every race has it's racists, but all racism is wrong and until we ALL realize that, we'll never see peace.

I would never approve of unsubstantiated racial violence, no matter which side of the fence it comes from.

Then until I see you pro-actively speaking up against racism directed against whites, a sense of fairness and equality might compel you to restrain yourself from bestowing a guilt trip on white racists that you're not generous enough to extend to racists of every other stripe.
 
Back
Top