Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Nigger Riots In Toledo

The Question said:
Oh, look, a big, fat, steaming ad hominem. I never would've expected that. :roll:

Latin. Ooh. And you even put it in parenthesis! That must make it correct!

:gagh:

I answered the feeble argument that my generalization of Nazis has to somehow address some spokesperson's comments. So WTF are you talking about? My hominem shit was clearly placed in my paragraph on racists, generally. Whether or not you interpret that as including you, I really couldn't care less.

I shouldn't have replied but this Latin abuse must be stopped.
 
The Question said:
Walking down the street in a group (NOT the same thing as a parade) may require paperwork, but it does not require anyone's permission.



Are you talking about the six million dead ones who, statistically, did not even exist? I'll take that bet.

Ahh so the Auschwitz-Birkenau, Treblinka, Belzec , Sobibór, Lublin, Majdanek concentration camps never existed?

All the video footage, photos, records, hundreds of graveyards were all doctored?, fabricated? *poof* out of thin air?

This is where you list all your Aryan Nation websites explaining to me with "factual" evidence that the holocost never happened.
 
SilentBtViolent said:
Latin. Ooh. And you even put it in parenthesis! That must make it correct!

Style over substance, after a fashion.


Appeal to Ridicule.

I answered the feeble argument that my generalization of Nazis has to somehow address some spokesperson's comments. So WTF are you talking about? My hominem shit was clearly placed in my paragraph on racists, generally.

Which further compounds your ad hominem fallacy with a Generalization fallacy.

I shouldn't have replied but this Latin abuse must be stopped.

You obviously see it as abuse because, as is abundantly obvious, you are not familiar with its proper use.
 
Atomic Weggie said:
Ahh so the Auschwitz-Birkenau, Treblinka, Belzec , Sobibór, Lublin, Majdanek concentration camps never existed?

Concentration camps existed. The existence of concentration camps does not, however, enable the conjuring and immaculate later disposal of six million human beings.

All the video footage,

-- of soldiers loading bodies onto trucks does not confirm the nationality of the soldiers, must less what the bodies died of --


-- which in some instances have been proven to be manipulations and fakes, and in all others fail to show direct evidence of extermination --


-- which suffer from the same evidentiary flaws as the photos --

hundreds of graveyards

-- there are hundreds of graveyards in the United States. Were we gassing Jews, too?

were all doctored?

Not all, but some.

fabricated?

Not all, but some.

*poof* out of thin air?

Not all, but some.

This is where you list all your Aryan Nation websites explaining to me with "factual" evidence that the holocost never happened.

Actually, most of the sources I cite in order to prove that are sites that either do not address the question at all, or actually support the official story. On the rare occasions when I do use skeptical sources, I exclusively use sources which draw from mainstream records with full notation and references.
 
More slowly:

- He argued I needed to address some spokesman.

- I said that wasn't true.

There is no ad hominem fallacy in here at all. Sure I go on to generalize about racists, but there is delectible irony to be had in that very fact. And it has nothing to do with ad hominem argument -- how am I dodging his assertion that I need to address the spokesperson by slamming him? It is nonexistent, kid, unless you can edit my post. So you are just misusing the Latin term.

But you seem like a fairly intelligent dude, so here's a little hint for you:

If you are doing this much trolling based on largely on race, it's a bad idea. People actually believe this shit so I think it is wrong to repackage this crap into a more intelligent form and put it out there, even for a laugh. Ideas travel, particularly ideas that seem to justify hatred. My .02, and now I'm out.

However, this is a good note: using Latin terms imprecisely (like your ragging on ad hominem here) is a wonderful way to troll, because the idiots believe you and the smart people get mad that you're not getting it right. Good show on that part.
 
SilentBtViolent said:
No red herring. I'm pointing out that you're an idiot for saying that a spokesperson defines anything resembling the truth. Just because you don't believe in the tanks running through the streets of Baghdad doesn't mean all is well with the regime, Bob.

But you are boring, so I'm done here. I just wanted to inject some sanity to a largely-inane thread. However, randomly tossing out my philosophy on racism sounds like fun so here goes.

Racism is the refuge of insecure or unstable individuals. The unsophisticated idea of racial superiority is laughably false, HILARIOUS to hear defended by someone who has bought totally into it, and mind-numbingly ineligant. I don't care to source the fact that it's been debunked by modern science, nutjobs hear what they want to hear. UFOs are TERRIFYING!! Just ask the whackos. BIGFOOT AND NIGGERS ARE RUINING OUR COUNTRY!!! Fruitcakes, seriously. Social problems and skin color have nothing to do with each other.

So, If you are insecure and feel the need, go find your solace in hating another race instead of yourself. Do your best to become the next Hitler, and resist all impulses to slit your own wrist -- it's just the booze talking when you get that impulse, and it has nothing to do with the fact that you hate those fucking niggers. Just be aware that some of us are very gainfully employed going through your trash, email and phone calls with a fine-toothed comb. So double-check that tax return, Cleatus.

An audit can be a BIG surprise when it happens!!

So you're saying you can't answer my question? Gotcha.

I didn't ask if the spokesman was being truthful. I didn't ask your opinion of me or anyone else. I asked what part of the spokesman's statement advocated violence. You refused to answer that.

But hey...you're done here, so see ya. ;)
 
[Breaks Character]

Uhm, can we just leave this topic as it is and accept the fact that one isolated incident happened and that it is now under control? Whatever happened, happened, and we need to make sure it doesn't happen again. Both sides are at fault here, not just the 'niggers' or the 'Nazis'. Pure and simple. :|
 
Sweet... it's all in "character". Let's put it in a play.

Matthew Broderick is into Broadway know, let's ballpark some figures.
 
I just want to keep posting in this thread, I think I'm up to like five times since I said I was out.

Which is literally one of my favorite things to do.

Another is to say that someone is not smart enough for me to reply to, then reply to them over and over.

I am seriously a freaking perfectionist, I can tell it will be my downfall.
 
Now see, that shit just misses the point. It's simply unfortunate that the stereotype often fits the "crime", and that's the problem with stereotypes...they're often true.

Fall not in love therefore, it will stick to your face.
 
Why would we invent stereotypes if they were not useful?

Anyone who is against stereotyping and prejudice is not being very specific, IMO.

For example, I stereotype my coworkers as non-homicidal, and I am prejudiced against anal rape.
 
That would only be because you are homophobic, or have yet to personally experience the pleasure of projectile ejaculation as a result of prostate stimulation.
 
Back
Top