Friday
Bazinga!
...the national program that is supposed to test children to hold teachers accountable?
Well, read this:
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/1082662.html
I personally had to administer an end of grade test to a profoundly disabled child that asked him to *read* a sentence, then answer a question about it. This poor child was also asked to reduce fractions, and name the stages of the water cycle.
Of course, he failed the test. His scores will be counted in with the rest of the school's, however, which will bring down the overall score. That skews the results, making it appear the school has not achieved adequate yearly progress.
Accountability is a good thing, but hold special needs teachers accountable for goals the child has worked on all year. When he first started, one of my students could not hold still enough to sit at a desk. Not only is he sitting or longer periods of time now, but he's also beginning to focus on what's going on around him. THAT is what his end of the year assessment should be. Not whether or not he knows what photosynthesis is.
NCLB need a major overhaul if it is ever to be effective.
Well, read this:
At age 9, Patti High has been profoundly affected by cerebral palsy since birth. But make no mistake:
She is still subject to the state's End-of-Grade Tests.
Bound to a wheelchair, Patti cannot really sit up unassisted. She cannot hold a fork and feed herself. She cannot converse in an easily understandable fashion. She cannot read. She cannot write ... .
Let's put it this way: The list of "cannot's" is extensive.
But because she is, by some definition, a third-grader, she is compelled to take the EOGs.
Don't blame the state, though. This particular bit of idiocy is courtesy of the federal government and the No Child Left Behind law.
No Child makes sure every student is terrorized, er, included, when standardized tests are given. It is well-intentioned, making sure schools don't skirt testing requirements by exempting kids who struggle in school.
But it's one thing to struggle. It's another to be profoundly disabled from birth. Hence the grievous glitches.
Case in point:
One of the questions asked of Patti was: What is the area of a rectangle?
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/1082662.html
I personally had to administer an end of grade test to a profoundly disabled child that asked him to *read* a sentence, then answer a question about it. This poor child was also asked to reduce fractions, and name the stages of the water cycle.
Of course, he failed the test. His scores will be counted in with the rest of the school's, however, which will bring down the overall score. That skews the results, making it appear the school has not achieved adequate yearly progress.
Accountability is a good thing, but hold special needs teachers accountable for goals the child has worked on all year. When he first started, one of my students could not hold still enough to sit at a desk. Not only is he sitting or longer periods of time now, but he's also beginning to focus on what's going on around him. THAT is what his end of the year assessment should be. Not whether or not he knows what photosynthesis is.
NCLB need a major overhaul if it is ever to be effective.