Surely you'd agree it's rare to find such profound irony operating on so many levels?
Federal government has really no business monkeying around with schools at that micromanagement level. Somewhere along the line we lost sight of what we were supposed to have schools for: teaching children to function in society.
I suspect there are sinister forces at work that take rational process out of the equation.
Never gonna happen.
I have kids. My wife volunteers at my younger son's school several days a week, runs the pta, oversees various inter and extra curricular activities and so forth. Additionally we're just finishing up my oldest's forth year of highschool in the same district.
Here's what we've learned - Once you finally do get access to the inner sanctum you're immediately struck by the stark reality that there is literally no one at the wheel.
You speak of people smarter than you? You might be surprised how wrong that idea turns out to be. We sure were. That why she volunteers. You want something done you roll up your sleeves, kick some drooling idiot out of the captains chair and land the fucker yourself.
With her it's one half helping out and one half watching the morons who are supposed to be watching the kids for some six hours a day. We're not that trusting. Especially when it comes to the little one. Gotta cover your six you know?
As a generally pro-union guy and bleeding heart liberal I hate to say it, but the current employment structure of the teacher's union is a huge part of the problem. The tenure system not only creates an untenable situation where absolutely horrible teachers are safe to continue their jobs, but bright and talented teachers are unceremoniously shoved out the door strictly due to politics and budgetary concerns. And under the flawed NCLB act, basically the push was for schools to label as many kids "special needs" as possible in order to get a chunk of the extra funding set aside for that part of the mandate.
It's a mess, and Gear's right: no one is driving the train.
Aside from eliminating the "tenure" system as it exists now and allowing more freedom in hiring and firing, the other steps that could be taken include addressing the budget problems between rich and poor districts. There are far too many problems in that area alone to address in a single post, but essentially rich tax base districts should not be receiving equal funds from the government teat, school books and other sanctioned businesses should be price-regulated, and mandatory attendance should not be a measure of how schools do business, but rather a combination of census data and the needs of the community. But of course these are pipe dreams as long as powerful interests are heavily stacked in some districts and not in others.You just described the problem with Unions in general. I disagree with your bleeding heart on that topic daddy, but that's another thread in the making.
You, Gear and I agree on something. No one is driving the K - 12 education train. Who do you think should be driving? We all know the problems, but I would be truly interested in hearing what someone with a teaching background (or related study?) considers a viable solution.
Aside from eliminating the "tenure" system as it exists now and allowing more freedom in hiring and firing, the other steps that could be taken include addressing the budget problems between rich and poor districts. There are far too many problems in that area alone to address in a single post, but essentially rich tax base districts should not be receiving equal funds from the government teat, school books and other sanctioned businesses should be price-regulated, and mandatory attendance should not be a measure of how schools do business, but rather a combination of census data and the needs of the community. But of course these are pipe dreams as long as powerful interests are heavily stacked in some districts and not in others.