Menu
What's new
Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

So

SuN

SuN

.:~**~.~**~.~**~:.
So I just want to briefly discuss foreskins.

In 2005 researchers realised why uncut men have a higher chance of contracting HIV; turns out...the foreskin has membranes that catch all kinds of bacteria/organisms/blablab so that the body can build immune defences.
So aside from HIV, which has totally pwnd humanity forevermoar ; do you think this means that uncut men have a higher immunity? and hence a higher rate of breeding?...considering partners are attracted by pheromones which communicate the integrity of the individuals immune system.

Hmm jst wondering
 
K, but do u think it would lead to uncuts breeding more and developing kick arse immunity compared to others?
 
Yub said:
Waaah. I'm uncircumcised, which means Loktar thinks my penis is ugly.
Click to expand...

Or maybe I'm just bitter.

Lost my foreskin in the holy war waged by those damn Jewish doctors at Long Island Jewish Medical Center.

My mom: My baby is Catholic.

Them: BWHAHAHAHAHA! *slice*
 
So, in support of my bullshit theory that cut men consequently have poorer immunity and are therefore less attractive as breeding partners; how many children do u each have?
 
SuN said:
So, in support of my bullshit theory that cut men consequently have poorer immunity and are therefore less attractive as breeding partners; how many children do u each have?
Click to expand...

Over a billion children. I keep watch over my sperm babies as they sleep in the cum bucket by the foot of my bed.

Oh shit wait.... I eat my cum.....*wonders how many of his sperm babies he's eaten*
 
Soooooooo is the translation "fuck it YUB wins, and ur retarded theory is correct''??

kthnx
 
SuN said:
Soooooooo is the translation "fuck it YUB wins, and ur retarded theory is correct''??

kthnx
Click to expand...

Translation: Yub doesn't win shit, I'm jealous of Yub's sexy penis, cum babies are delicious, and your theory isn't correct just retarded.
 
Ilyanna said:
The look of a penis is completely irrelevant. It's the taste that counts.
Click to expand...

I hope you are referring to the ejaculate. If the penis itself tastes nasty, you probably shouldnt put it inside your mouth or anywhere else.
 
Loktar said:
TMI!:eek:
Click to expand...

I swear to the goddess of TK, I would never have thought to see this coming from you. In the Badlands. I am truly shocked.

Sniper Kitty said:
I hope you are referring to the ejaculate. If the penis itself tastes nasty, you probably shouldnt put it inside your mouth or anywhere else.
Click to expand...
Exactly. That's why the taste is more important than the look. Glad we could resolve this.
 
Ilyanna said:
I swear to the goddess of TK, I would never have thought to see this coming from you. In the Badlands. I am truly shocked.


Exactly. That's why the taste is more important than the look. Glad we could resolve this.
Click to expand...

Ah you were referring to the taste of the ejaculate. Now that is information I can handle. Just shocked at the mental image of you slurping/tasting some random dudes cock.
 
That study was done in Africa. Where the ratio of men who are uncut to cut is almost like 1,000:1. As I think you provided in an earlier thread, Africa has the highest HIV population in the world. All that their study indicated was that the pores on the underside of the foreskin are slightly larger making it easier to contract HIV. Whereas men who are cut are less likely to contract HIV. Of course, their analysis said simply, "that when walking through a rainstorm it's hard not to get wet."

So, your theory is moot, SuN. There is no immunity to HIV/AIDS. That's what the name indicates. Also, since it's easier for uncut men to contract said virus, it's logical to deduce they don't have better immunities, but higher likelihoods of contracting, hosting, and spreading the virus. That would make them poor fathers, don't you think?

While it is true that the foreskin is outdated and almost completely unneeded by humans, it does provide some sexual stimulation for the uncut men that the cuts don't get. So, they may be dirtier (if you live outside and don't have access to a shower once every three days) but they're more pleasurable. As long as everyone wears raincoats, who cares about the absorption abilities of the underside of the foreskin?

I'm cut. I happen to think men who are uncut have somewhat unsightly penises. I mean, what do you see more of in porn, cut or uncut? The answer is cut. Because they're more attractive. They're more attractive because they're cleaner and healthier. Despite that, I dislike the arrogance of parents today. Thinking it's perfectly alright to disfigure their sons simply because it's more aesthetic.

I don't think I'll be slicing off the foreskin of my first born son. I'll let him decide later down the road if he'd like to mutilate his penis in the search for the ideal-looking dick. Or, if he'd rather not and enjoy sex with whomever he chooses.

As for kitty's argument about sucking piss when sucking cock. Most men lick your un-wiped piss when they're going down on you, so fair's fair. At least urine is sterile. HIV ain't.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top