Troll Kingdom
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Who will succeed Barack Obama as President in 2016?
- Thread starter Aquehonga
- Start date
Laker_Girl
Mrs. Big Dick McGee
How funny that you assume Obama will be president again in 2012. I don't think as many Americans as he thought are digging becoming Canada. Obama's socialism isn't really working out all that well. And isn't it funny how a black liberal was elected and yet the entire world didn't fall back in love with us...As if that matters a damn. Tsk, tsk...Obama's presidential days may be numbered.
Sarek
Vuhlkansu Wihs
Does it matter? The way politics in this country operate, regardless which side of the table you sit on, the rich will get richer and the rest of us are screwed. It'll just happen a bit faster if another conservative wins the office.
Laker_Girl
Mrs. Big Dick McGee
^^You're ridiculous.
dogbert
King of Sarcasm
It is a mystery.
hpquestion:
Hopefully Obamas policies wont make us too fat happy and stupid so we can elect another democrat into office.
Laker_Girl
Mrs. Big Dick McGee
Obama has policies? Seems like a free for all to me...Truly a FREE for ALL. Well, except those of us that have real jobs and actually pay taxes.
Sarek
Vuhlkansu Wihs
Really?
Did you know that the gap between the middle class and the wealthy grew larger during Bushy Jr's. terms than it did during the Nixon, Ford, Reagan and Bush Sr. years combined?
dogbert
King of Sarcasm
Well thats to you. To me his regulations in the financial area are a welcome sight. During the anything goes Bush era, investors have been fleeing in droves. Also with him insisting of stocks from these companies that recieved tarp from Bush the taxpayer will recieve a nice reward for helping them out instead of the Bush plan which consisted of throwing money at the banks and keeping no records of the transactions.
SaintLucifer
beer, I want beer
You are equating Obama's policies with those of Canada? Bwaaaaahhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
You, dear, are a fucking MORON. We are NOT a socialist country. How many times do you Americans need to be reminded? Fuck, you are all stupid.
Conchaga
Let's fuck some shit up
No, the rich will remain rich while the rest of us are taxed into mediocrity. Trust fund babies and fat cats with the ability to sit on their ass and not have a steady income aren't affected by taxation. Which is why dems and repubs in congress are so eager to pass new taxes. It doesn't affect them. Just as a nationalized healthcare system wouldn't affect them. They'd be comfortable in their gated communities with the best healtcare the populace can provide while the rest of us scrounge for food and wait in line for medicine.
Of course, if Obama didn't have his head so far up the ass of FDR's rotting corpse, he'd have noticed in 1980's USSR, this same plan failed miserably.
I was reading a book about life in the depression during the 1930's in Philadelphia, and I realized that there are far more similarities between now and the way it was then.
Prepare yourself folks. The end is nigh.
Eggs Mayonnaise
All In With The Nuts
What's amazing is how well that cookie-cutter conservative/Refurblican spin is working on the flyover states, especially since it's all a bag of pachyderm diarrhea.
Dirk Funk
Evil Penguin
Of COURSE he won't. He CAN'T. A President can't repeal a Constitutional amendment. Go back to civics class.
Go wash your mouth out with soap
issed:Now
Sean Hannity the :retard: claimed Obamaphiles had clandestine insidious plans to somehow overturn the 22nd Amendment
Stivic's class
hpquestion:As in Mike
hpquestion:
Dual
RIP Karl 1991-2014
It all comes out in the wash
No, not really.