The Question
Eternal
Who are you talking about? Scientific American? The Rockefeller University immunologist who conducted the study you don't like? You can dispute their claims on the basis of... apparently nothing other than your own anecdotes and the fact that you don't like the idea of actual science contradicting the prevailing narrative, but your personal dislikes are hardly persuasive.Yep, once again you misinterperet real data. Rely on fucking idiots as mentors, people who deal in misinformation because they have some axe to grind and come up short.
"LIARS!"
"You say that, but you have no empirical basis for calling them liars; you can't even supply a motive for them to lie."
"But they're LIARS!"
The only people who would be persuaded by that are people who have already been persuaded by a year and a half of social conditioning.