Grammour Boy said:
Except it would be a lie.
No, and I can prove it.
Evidence: I never say "fuck you in the neck".
True, but your affinity for pedanticism and semantics is equally annoying, yet wholly unfunny compared to Jack's 'vulgarian' statement.
Evidence: I hardly ever use vulgarian insults or pejoratives to address my fellow members.
True, but you're quick to use a meme whenever you can and you're not afraid to use a thesaurus as often as possible to try and prove that you're a pretentious pseudo-intellectual.
Evidence: I am the most polite TK member. Even when I talk down to people I do so in eloquent style and language.
Not true. You're argumentative and haughty.
Evidence: My contribution to science and literature. Refer to my "Red Admiral" thread for the former, and my "Horrific Candor" thread for the latter.
Those are spam topics. Anyone can easily go to wiki and copy paste that info and photos here. I could flood an entire forum with similar topics in a day. Also, you picked incredibly droll and uninteresting topics to use, therefore they were dead the moment you clicked 'post new topic'. So, this makes you a spammer not a scientific contributor. Also, you still haven't sat down and engaged my topic I started just for you in AP. Until you do so, this argument of yours will be totally moot.
Evidence: My never spamming the boards with floods of necro'ed threads or otherwise posting a bunch of "dkfa9dadlkakdk" a la Gagh.
Oh, and using tons of 'O RLY?' memes, single pics of large breasted women, and 'no you' posts aren't spam? O RLY has been banned from other boards for being spam. Try posting those pics of well-endowed women at other boards, see what they say. Spam is spam is spam. You are a spammer. Also, and look at your post count (currently 6,068 posts). There are people who have been here for A LOT longer than you who only have a fraction of the post count you do.
Evidence: etc, etc, etc....They are too numerous to list them all
Conclusion: I contribute to TK immensely in some ways in more positive fashion and more elegant style than perhaps any other TK'er besides Captain Wacky.
Yes, there's a TON of evidence against you. Actually, I have yet to see you contribute in any postitive form at TK whatsoever. I also hope you're being facetious about the Captain Wacky comment, because I've never seen a more erronious statement at TK.
You were saying?