This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Just came back from seeing the Deathly Hallows Part 1.
I feel about this one the same way I felt about the last one - maybe even more so. Apparently a person should have read the books in order to understand the relevance of some places, people, and events that haven't been in the movies before but now are suddenly big plot points.
Some things happen in this movie that remind me of other movies:
1. the similarity of how the horcrux affects the personality of the wearer much like how the ringbearer was affected in the LOtR stories.
2. Dumbledore being able to interject on the world of the living, much like Obe Wan Kenobi in Star Wars.
Some times I couldn't get into the narrative because I couldn't understand what Rupert Gint was saying - in particular:
how he found and got possession of the sword that they needed to have to complete an action in this movie
^
I think that's Dumbledore's brother.
(I want to say Snatch had some notable offenders, but that's probably my memory playing tricks on me).
Soooo.....yeah I'll be seeing it this weekend....I think I've watched one of the HP movies in total, the others I'm not sure. Am I going to enjoy it or will I be completely bored?
I've seen the other movies but I've not read the books. This movie and the last one appear to be intended for the audience that has read the books. Many characters and events are discussed and pop up out of nowhere with the assumption that the audience knows their backstory and relevance to the current action. You may not be bored but you might be confused.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.