Gurk_MacGuintey said:
And I should give a shit that some other nards here don't like your politics?
I'm trying to say that I agree with most of your stances on issues, just not your ways of presenting them.
There's nothing wrong with being blunt, but you do at times put more issues in a blanket than should be.
Yes, they ARE related to 9/11. Apparently you fail to understand that Islam has been at war with the entire rest of the world since 632 ad. The history of Islam is a history of bloodshed, violence and conquest. Every single nation that today is Islamic was at one time invaded by slathering hordes of bloody-minded fanatics who gave their conquered foes one simple choice: Conform or Die. And taking a cursory glance around our world today: Nigeria, Chad, Sudan, Eritrea, Bosnia, Kosovo, Chechnya, Kashmir, Thailand, Indonesia, Phillipines - we see conflict after conflict that involves muslims who cannot get along with their non-muslim neighbors and want to convert them to their phucked up religion or kill them.
Did they
even matter before 1938? The problem does not stem from them, but from the allowal of white, western governments, controlled by cosmopolitan Jews, to let them emmigrate en masse.
What happened on 9/11/01 was simply a continuation of a worldwide trend over the last 30 or 40 years - namely, a resurgence of the Jihad which had been quiescent in the Islamic world since the 18th century.
You are such an Israeli peon if you believe this 'clash of cultures' nonsense.
The only reason Muslims have become an issue is because them and Jews don't get along. End of discussion, all other priorities are rescinded, and I challenge any one of the Leftist wimps like Hambil, Hairball, Cait, Wordin, or any the you fucking psuedo-intellectuals to really take a contrary position to this, even though we all know that Hairball is the only one with the guts, intellect, and knowledge to even approach this topic, even if I'm flat-on-my-face wrong or not.
The rifles of Europe protected it hundreds of years ago from the threat of Islam, and now, the nuclear bombs protect the Western European nations.
I know your thread is about a domestic issue, but no discussion of 9/11 can be complete without also discussing the evil ideology of Islam, and no discussion of Islam can be had without talking about Jihad, which is a universalist mission for all muslim scum in the Umma.
I understand what you mean, but it's on a much smaller level of national dynamics - look at Albanians. Supposedly atheist, Muslims from birth, who act like rats at every turn.
Right now, Sweden is facing a wave of gang-rapes by Muslims. So is Australia. In fact, there were
race riots there in which the Aussies didn't approve to Lebonese gangs proclaiming Australians to be racist, for Australia to belong to them, etc. Of course, it was skewed in favor of the turbs.
If it wasn't from huge national vulnerabilities, like that which atheistical and ethnocentrics Jews seek to widen, such countries would not be vulnerable to a Fundamentalist Muslim threat.
reference on the universalist mission of Jihad:
Ibn Khaldun (d. 1406), ostensibly the pre-eminent Islamic scholar in history, summarized five centuries of prior Muslim jurisprudence with regard to the uniquely Islamic institution of jihad, as follows:
"In the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the (Muslim) mission and (the obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force. ..The other religious groups did not have a universal mission, and the holy war was not a religious duty for them, save only for purposes of defense. ..Islam is under obligation to gain power over other nations."
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printabl e.asp?ID=4857
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/[email protected] [email protected]/1922
More preaching to the choir.
