That depends on what is is are is or ain't, by definition.
Do you think no has always meant no? Also do you think we interpret the rules governing so called 'no means no' differently depending on our gender?
When a woman say no means no does she mean the same thing as when a man says no means no?
It seems like eloisel says "no means no w/ option"
and you say "no means no w/ serious implication"
Correcting + or - a degree for eloisel's clever ability to sidestep that which is implied
Shit. Can we all agree yes means yes?
Timing means more than definition, and yeah it usually means implications. "No" at the front door means something different than "No" in coitus interruptus. One is like Eloisel's version, where the circumstances may change at a later date. But the other is more along the lines of "I hate you we're done here" and comes with an exclamation point.
Right up until it doesn't.
Would y'all say that "no means no"?
How about in the philosophical sense?
This thread sucks.
Then improve it.Why should I?
However any girl I am with who tries to play control games with "no means no" finds out pretty quick what my back looks like. I don't play with people that emotionally insecure.
Does A = A?
:eyebrows:
Is there ever a time when yes means no? Like for example if a person was somehow unqualified or unable to say yes unequivocally but did anyway. Would that then mean their 'yes' was unqualified and should have been and is, at least to an outside observer, in fact a 'no'?
For legality's sake no must mean no unequivocally and instantly. As we see way too many times, it doesn't take a conviction to ruin a mans life, just an accusation. I have personally had to screech to a halt a couple times when somebody abruptly changed her mind, sobered up or recovered from the rufies quicker than expected. It is their right to put on the brakes.
Is there ever a time when yes means no? Like for example if a person was somehow unqualified or unable to say yes unequivocally but did anyway. Would that then mean their 'yes' was unqualified and should have been and is, at least to an outside observer, in fact a 'no'?
I said 'no' because you slipped me those roofies, asshole!
People take this sort of topic very personally for some reason.
I agree. I'm trying to gain some insight on why that is.
I have a feeling people don't like the gravity (somewhere down deep) of a final statement. It's a pigeon hole or a corner painted into. Remember eloisel's fancy hats? I think it makes us feel as if we might be missing out on something that may be just around the corner. But hey, what do I know - no means no unequivocally right ladies?
Wait are you saying sometimes yes means no or it should?
Do you think no has always meant no? Also do you think we interpret the rules governing so called 'no means no' differently depending on our gender?
When a woman say no means no does she mean the same thing as when a man says no means no?
It seems like eloisel says "no means no w/ option"
and you say "no means no w/ serious implication"
Correcting + or - a degree for eloisel's clever ability to sidestep that which is implied
I tend to interpret 'No' as a final. It seems women think of 'no' as final with option to change. Which in my mind is more dangerously dynamic then I care for (I'm speaking sexually now). The problem is nowadays women want people to hear 'no' as final without option which is the classicly male interpretation. I wonder if women are really ready to opt out of their intrinsic option. I sure hope so because we all been learned up good now aint we?
I agree. I'm trying to gain some insight on why that is.
I have a feeling people don't like the gravity (somewhere down deep) of a final statement. It's a pigeon hole or a corner painted into. Remember eloisel's fancy hats? I think it makes us feel as if we might be missing out on something that may be just around the corner. But hey, what do I know - no means no unequivocally right ladies?
Wait are you saying sometimes yes means no or it should?