Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Are theatrical movies now irrelevant?

Eggs Mayonnaise said:
I see maybe 2 or 3 movies a year in the theaters. It's just too easy to wait a few months to see/record it off PPV or cable.

And for the record, I don't mind paying $11 for a movie in theory. I do mind paying that much, and then having to actually sit through several COMMERCIALS in the theater before they even show previews. That takes balls. And you know they get universally negative feedback for doing it, yet they do it anyway, and keep adding more each year just to test people's limits. Is this the only way theaters can stay in business?

Yeah same here. The last movies I saw in a theater were Click and Superman Returns. Good thing I saw Superman 1 and 2. Lot of references from them in Superman Returns.
 
Eggs Mayonnaise said:
Do they show it on a digital screen? It's on videotape...I will never understand works done on digivideo still being called "films"...it's like calling a painting a photograph...

Just thank Blair Witch for starting that trend. BTW, they're making a new movie "Solstice". I'm guessing it should be equally shitty.
 
OK, BDM.... I agree and disagree. There ARE still movies that are worth seeing. Also, it's an art form, much like broadway musicals, opera, ballet, symphony, plays, and anything else that's a performace art. People still go to see these things even though TV has made them TOTALLY obsolete. When I say totally, I mean TOTALLY. With picture and sound in Hi-Def, you can experience your TV like you're actually at the performace.

Though, I agree with Isch. There are elements of being a member of an audience that you just can't get at home. Take cult films for instance. Specifically Rocky Horror. That movie cannot be watched at home as a stand-alone piece of entertainment.

As for creativity, it takes a lot of talent to write, direct, and act-out a movie. The writer must put together a coherent script that has a good plot, characters with depth, and set the proper tone for the film. The actors must make you believe that what they're going through is real. The director must put the two together seamlessly to make the movie click. They've also got a time limit. They have to get you introduced to the character, make you associate with them, put you through an emotional rollercoaster, and send you home happy in three hours or less. That's not an easy task to accomplish.

As for TV, they've got it easy. They have at least 15 hours (Assuming it's a one hour show with a regular season) of material to accomplish all of that. Yes, they can get more detailed on almost every aspect of the storyline. Hell, Trekers go apeshit when they're watching "Encounter At Farpoint" due to all of the continuity errors. I can name at least three off the top of my head.

Yes, you may be right. TV has rendered theatrical films obsolete. However, the same was said about stage performances when movies were invented. They thought that theater releases were doomed when the availability of home-viewed movies became more widespread. Concerts were obsolete with vinyl records. The CD was lost to MP3's. Yet, as Eggs can probably tell you, Broadway still thrives. There are still at least 20 major symphony orchestras in the US. Ballet troupes are everywhere. Millions of devoted fans still go to see their favorite bands at concerts every year. How do you think mp3's become mp3's in the first place? Somebody's gotta buy the CD and download the songs. So, CD's are still being bought.

The movie theaters aren't leaving. They may diminish, but they'll never disappear.
 
1. Picard has a full head of hair in one scene, then he's bald in another
2. Whoopie Goldberg doesn't appear as Guinan when we know she was there because she mentioned it once in passing in a TNG book published in 1990.
3. Worf's is laughing through pretty much every scene he's in.
 
Data uses contractions, like 'Can't' and 'Don't'.

When they separate the saucer section from the main body of the ship, they say that they'll arrive in about an hour. In less than 60 seconds, of continuous time on the show, they arrive.

When Riker is looking for Data, the computer tells him that he's in the holodeck, the next hatch on the right. He makes a left into the holodeck.
 
Well the first one isn't a problem taking "Farpoint" by itself as they didn't make up the contractions thing until the Lore episode (I think.)

BUT ANYWAY, YEAH, MOVIES ARE DEAD LOL, ADAM SANDLER MARRIES A COCONUT.
 
CaptainWacky said:
Well the first one isn't a problem taking "Farpoint" by itself as they didn't make up the contractions thing until the Lore episode (I think.)

No, it was established in "farpoint".

Throughout the entire series Data uses contractions 32 times.
 
It's funny how they mention that Data has an aging program in one episode but Spiner still wanted to quit becasue he "looked too old". NEMESIS KILLED THEATRICAL MOVIES.
 
Back
Top