Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Ask your White Nationalism questions here

I find it amusing that for those who believe in evolution must always believe in a single common origin.

Logically, that's pretty assinine. If men evolved, then why could they have crawled out of a million different ponds, and not just one. Why at some point in their evolution are they required to spring from one source in africa?

The whole concept is silly.
 
headvoid said:
Ok, I'll be more specific

How would the white supremacist feel about a blood test that showed the true nature of their DNA - i.e say they found out they had negro blood at some point in their family tree?

It might matter to some of them, not to all of them. The issue most intelligent WNs have with other ethnic groups has little or nothing to do with their differing superficial physical traits, and everything to do with the cultures of differing ethnic groups.
 
The Question said:
It might matter to some of them, not to all of them. The issue most intelligent WNs have with other ethnic groups has little or nothing to do with their differing superficial physical traits, and everything to do with the cultures of differing ethnic groups.

I hear that happens all the time. At all the hogroasts if they see a negro they say:

I do wonder if that black guy is one of us?
Do you think he likes folk music?
It's not the skin I object to it's the rap music and gun culture
 
Cranky Bastard said:
I find it amusing that for those who believe in evolution must always believe in a single common origin.

I didn't say that.

We have a small rise in racism and white supremacy in France, Germany and the low countries at the moment. I would love to show them their DNA results as we are all mongrels, the idea of supremacy by gene, or birth kind of becomes pointless.

Or are we on differing cultures now? TQ has muddied the waters a bit.
 
headvoid said:
I didn't say that.

We have a small rise in racism and white supremacy in France, Germany and the low countries at the moment.
Is it in response to immigration?

I would love to show them their DNA results as we are all mongrels, the idea of supremacy by gene, or birth kind of becomes pointless.
Again with this supremacy stuff... is it a requisite for being able to choose who you'd prefer to be your neighbor?
 
headvoid said:
I didn't say that.

I was making a general observation.

We have a small rise in racism and white supremacy in France, Germany and the low countries at the moment.

Because the dumbfuck-immigrants won't assimilate. The most welcoming society, the Netherlands, has suffered some of the worst singular atrocities against their inclusionary methods.

I would love to show them their DNA results as we are all mongrels, the idea of supremacy by gene, or birth kind of becomes pointless.

I don't give a shit about racial stuff, so maybe I shouldn't be in this argument. But I do see a clash of cultures - one tolerant, the other intolerant and demanding everyone else become intolerant.

Of course, in the case of europe, we're talking the immigration and non-assimilation of islam. Islam spans many races and cultures, superceding differences with a dogma of conquest. We accept their dogma if they will live with us. They refuse to live with anyone. We are not the party at fault, here.
 
I think being tolerant is much easier than being intolerant. For one thing, you don't have to be so goddamn vigilant. I prefer finding out about who people are through their actions rather than their ethnicity, and I've had some pleasant surprises as a result.
 
My favorite book is Gone With The Wind. What a fantastic story.

I especially like the way they had slaves. I wish I could have lived in those times and let the little "darkies" do all the work for me.

How blissful life must have been.

:D
 
Messenger said:
Is it in response to immigration?
yes, but to answer Cranky's point as well - not always Islam. The widening of the EU has brought in cheap hard working labour - prepared to work harder and do all of our shitty jobs. It's been a boost to the UK economy in particular, just like when the West Indians or 1st generation Indians came over. There has been a rise in attack and hate on the "slavic" nations.
Messenger said:
Again with this supremacy stuff... is it a requisite for being able to choose who you'd prefer to be your neighbor?
Quite... weren't you the one talking for the White Supremacists in this thread?
Cranky said:
Because the dumbfuck-immigrants won't assimilate. The most welcoming society, the Netherlands, has suffered some of the worst singular atrocities against their inclusionary methods.
Agreed, the most tolerant nation in the entire continent has been particularly hard hit. It's a victory for the fuckwits against inclusion.
Cranky said:
Of course, in the case of europe, we're talking the immigration and non-assimilation of islam.
France yes, but Germany not so much - and the UK has more immigration now from Eastern Europe than anywhere else, so not as simple as that. White supremacists will always be there, just most times people realise how dumb they are. The Islamic extremists have given them fuel. Extremism requires it's opposite number to survive.
 
Yes. but the funniest thing is the left wing liberals claiming they are being exploited!

Anywhere there are large groups of immigrants taking low paid jobs, the BNP has a voice. I can't talk for the Low countries or Germany with such detail - but I do know that Germany has had to have a special veto on immigrants from Eastern Europe due to internal political pressure.
 
Cranky Bastard said:
Is there a bigoted movement against eastern europeans?

I think germans are sexy. I used to have a couple of sexy looking naked german guys in a folder....

Guess I deleted them, but, if I could get away with posting them here, I'd let you see how awesome the eastern europeans are.

:blush:
 
headvoid said:
Yes. but the funniest thing is the left wing liberals claiming they are being exploited!

Sounds like America. Anything that further erodes the fabric of the nation (cohesive assimilation) - those people are painted as a victim of exploitation. :gagh:
 
headvoid said:
Quite... weren't you the one talking for the White Supremacists in this thread?
Actually it's a word you chose to employ. As for immigration, isn't it their nation, the recipient peoples'? Immigration and tolerance are strictly enforced from the top down. Isn't that a bit unfair?
 
I myself have wondered why the word 'supremacist' suddenly cropped up in this thread. There's a pretty solid difference between white supremacism and white nationalism. One seeks to dominate, the other only seeks preservation.
 
The Question said:
I myself have wondered why the word 'supremacist' suddenly cropped up in this thread. There's a pretty solid difference between white supremacism and white nationalism. One seeks to dominate, the other only seeks preservation.

Hi TQ. What happened to your avatar? Are you hiding?
 
hitler.gif
 
Top