Bondage is merely a form of weakness and lack sureness on the part of the sadist. Control by way of lash and knot otherwise unachievable by force of will. Or weakness cheating for position if you like.
About bondage? I get why it would turn a woman on to be immobilized and taken. I think labeling the top a sadist is a bit much, especially if the goal is forced orgasm. It's supposed to be play.
I see your point. Sadist was strong given the context. It wouldn't be fair for me to label a person in the dominant postion something only they themself would know for sure.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.