Brown wins the Massachusetts special senate election!

Barack Obama

44th President of the USA
I've been looking for you, good sir. I'm afraid you need a lesson from your elders regarding good stewardship of the economy, and the definition of Liberty itself. Do you honestly believe that economic and civil liberties can be separated?

You claim you support the rights of the downtrodden, yet you propose to take the very right of self sufficiency away from them. You talk about people having the "right to choose" however, the only choice you're interested in people having is the choice whether or not to exterminate their unborn child. Should a person have the right to choose how their tax money is spent? No. The average citizen can't be trusted. Should a parent get to choose where to send their child to school, and how they should be educated? Of course not. Parents have no right to decide that. The State should handle such important matters for them. Should a person have the right to choose to carry a weapon to defend life and limb from those who may harm them or their families? Under no circumstances! The citizenry MUST remain unarmed and dependant on the teat of the all powerful State!

I propose, my dear friend, that you take a hard look at your own ideas and how they compare to the ideals which allowed this Republic to become great. As it stands now, your disaterous policies will further the economic decline of the nation. I urge you to rethink your positions, and look toward the future. Leave behind the failed experiment of socialism. Work toward a smaller, more agile government with a vibrant economy, rather than the current system which has become bloated with largess and corruption.

Best Wishes,
Thomas Jefferson

Dear Sir,

You're putting Thomas Jefferson's name to shame. On a stylistic level, I am pretty sure that Tom would have been able to spell "disastrous" and "dependent" without embarrassing himself.

As for the substance (or lack thereof), linking me, Barack Hussein Obama, with "socialism" is what a simplistic mind would do, and displays a profound misunderstanding of what the current US administration is doing to bring back America from the bottomless pit that my precedent put it into.

Kindest Regards,
Yours Truly.
 

Donovan

beer, I want beer
We don't have unregulated capitalism. We don't have anything approching it. The type of system we have is neo-corporatist fascism. It is NOT true capitalism.

Which is why health care reform is doomed to failure no matter who's pushing it, and Obama's doomed to the same fate Jimmy Carter faced: an affable, well-meaning visitor to the Washington Zoo who mistakenly climbed into the lion's cage because he thought they were waving at him...
 

faith_in_barack

I Serve His Divine Presence
Dear Sir,

You're putting Thomas Jefferson's name to shame. On a stylistic level, I am pretty sure that Tom would have been able to spell "disastrous" and "dependent" without embarrassing himself.

As for the substance (or lack thereof), linking me, Barack Hussein Obama, with "socialism" is what a simplistic mind would do, and displays a profound misunderstanding of what the current US administration is doing to bring back America from the bottomless pit that my precedent put it into.

Kindest Regards,
Yours Truly.

Lord,

We are as ants in your presence. Grant us your blessing, Lord?
 

Bickendan

Shifty sumbitch
^Looks like it's time to spray some Raid in this thread.
 

Thomas Jefferson

Alexander Hamilton is my bitch
Dear Sir,

You're putting Thomas Jefferson's name to shame. On a stylistic level, I am pretty sure that Tom would have been able to spell "disastrous" and "dependent" without embarrassing himself.

Dear Mr. Obama,

Please excuse me for hitting the brandy a bit too hard before posting. However, it's a difficult proposition at best, to respond to such sophomoric nonsense sober.

As for the substance (or lack thereof), linking me, Barack Hussein Obama, with "socialism" is what a simplistic mind would do, and displays a profound misunderstanding of what the current US administration is doing to bring back America from the bottomless pit that my precedent put it into.
Kindest Regards,
Yours Truly.



The mark of a good writer is to cater to the educational level of his audience. Sometimes simplistic generalizations are all that are appropriate. How is it then, that you reckon the American economy will flourish by increasing the very behaviors and activities which led to it's decline? Government meddling in the free market economy, currency manipulation, egregious entitlement programs, top heavy bureaucracy, et cetera.

While you wish to debate semantics, the real problems remain. The fact that you still support central planning, large scale regulation and increased taxation speaks for itself. While I have no doubt of your noble intentions, I am convinced you are sorely misguided and doomed to failure if you remain on this present course.

P.S. And I do believe you meant "predecessor", not "precedent". However, we'll leave that little bourde between us.

Sincerely,
Thomas Jefferson
 

SAUSAGEMAN

Registered User
Whoops!
As Republicans are mounting plans to repeal the health care legislation -- and girding for battle in the Senate over a series of changes -- Senator Scott Brown is so far not immediately jumping on the bandwagon despite his well-established opposition to President Obama's health care overhaul.

Instead, Brown is keeping his options open in the wake of a Republican defeat, saying he wants time to study the bills and was noncommittal over whether he would vote against it.

When asked today if it was possible that he would vote for the so-called reconciliation package that the Senate will debate this week, Brown said, "I haven't read it yet. I want to be able to read it first."

The legislation was released on Thursday and has been virtually the only topic anyone in Congress has talked about for weeks.

Brown also said initially that he is not yet ready to join some of his Republican colleagues in an effort to repeal the health care bill that President Obama will sign today.

"I think that's a little premature," he said, when asked whether he would try to repeal the legislation. "I want to see what's going to be in play."
 
Top