Cacophony
lkjewro23piqjur2oijkslfaw e
The joke was lame, gawd, get over it.Alex Buchet said:So you didn't get the joke?
The joke was lame, gawd, get over it.Alex Buchet said:So you didn't get the joke?
So you and Donovan got the joke. But not jack, it seems.Cacophony said:The joke was lame, gawd, get over it.
That doesn't make it any less pathetic.Alex Buchet said:So you and Donovan got the joke. But not jack, it seems.
It's not my strip, I'm just trying to ascertain whether or not jack got the joke. He said he didn't, then he said he did. Where do you come in?Donovan said:I get it, mainly because I was a huge fan of C & H way back when. I remember they had a whole series of strips on the transmogrifier.
But this just isn't funny. Sorry. If this is the result of two or three weeks' worth of idea planning, don't give up your day job.
Wait, do you HAVE a day job?
Whether or not it's a bad joke is irrelevant. Jack seems to think it's a pretty obscure joke.Cacophony said:That doesn't make it any less pathetic.
LMAOZEDONG!Donovan said:WAITAMINNIT!!!!!
I think I finally get the joke that's been happening all along! Go back to the web host for the strip, and change "Weekly web comic" to "weakly" funnies. Then everything becomes clear. We've all been pwned because it was MEANT to suck major ass....
Alex Buchet said:It's not my strip, I'm just trying to ascertain whether or not jack got the joke. He said he didn't, then he said he did. Where do you come in?
Alex Buchet said:Whether or not it's a bad joke is irrelevant. Jack seems to think it's a pretty obscure joke.
Alex Buchet said:But why didn't jack? That's what I'm after.
Alex Buchet said:So you and Donovan got the joke. But not jack, it seems.
Ishcabittle said:I think I got it, I'm guessing the strip's main point is that the author can't think of something original or creative, and must rip off another artist to get material. Here's the funny part, though, it's not funny in the slightest, so it's a rip off for nothin'. Am I right?
Irregardless is a term that has caused controversy since it first appeared in the early twentieth century. It is generally listed in dictionaries as "non-standard".Donovan said:www.m-w.com/dictionary/irregardless/
Yes it is, just an obscure one. Get it? It's a redundancy not in common use for some time, and yeah I used it on purpose.
Elrod said:The joke is that everyone is discussing a strip that most of them don't like. Let's all meet back here Friday to talk about the next strip, OK?