Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Has anyone looked at the "economic stimulus" package in-depth yet???

Volpone

Zombie Hunter
...because partisan pundits purport that it is simply a ploy to fund liberal pet projects that have little to do with stimulating the economy. :S:
 
Obama called for an end of pork barrel politics, so I highly doubt those pundits know jack shit.
 
What is the money being spent on-general breakdown between infrastructure, tax cuts, etc…?

Some highlights of the package, by the numbers:

• $825 billion total (as of 1/15/09)
• $550 billion in new spending, described as thoughtful and carefully targeted priority investments with unprecedented accountability measures built in.
• $275 billion in tax relief ($1,000 tax cut for families, $500 tax cut for individuals through SS payroll deductions)
• $ 90 billion for infrastructure
• $ 87 billion Medicaid aid to states
• $ 79 billion school districts/public colleges to prevent cutbacks
• $ 54 billion to encourage energy production from renewable sources
• $ 41 billion for additional school funding ($14 billion for school modernizations and repairs, $13 billion for Title I, $13 billion for IDEA special education funding, $1 billion for education technology)
• $ 24 billion for "health information technology to prevent medical mistakes, provide better care to patients and introduce cost-saving efficiencies" and "to provide for preventative care and to evaluate the most effective healthcare treatments."
• $ 16 billion for science/technology ($10 billion for science facilities, research, and instrumentation; $6 billion to expand broadband to rural areas)
• $ 15 billion to increase Pell grants by $500
• $ 6 billion for the ambiguous "higher education modernization."

[Source: Committee on Appropriations: January 15, 2009 ]

Here is a further breakdown of the package:

NOTE: The following are highlights of the package; for the full 13-page summary from the Appropriations Committee, click here:

(as of 1/15/09)

Energy
$32 billion: Funding for "smart electricity grid" to reduce waste
$16 billion: Renewable energy tax cuts and a tax credit for research and development on energy-related work, and a multiyear extension of renewable energy production tax credit
$6 billion: Funding to weatherize modest-income homes

Science and Technology
$10 billion: Science facilities
$6 billion: High-speed Internet access for rural and underserved areas

Infrastructure
$30 billion: Transportation projects
$31 billion: Construction and repair of federal buildings and other public infrastructure
$19 billion: Water projects
$10 billion: Rail and mass transit projects

Education
$41 billion: Grants to local school districts
$79 billion: State fiscal relief to prevent cuts in state aid
$21 billion: School modernization ($15.6 billion to increase the Pell grant by $500; $6 billion for higher education modernization)

Health Care
$39 billion: Subsidies to health insurance for unemployed; providing coverage through Medicaid
$87 billion: Help to states with Medicaid
$20 billion: Modernization of health-information technology systems
$4.1 billion: Preventative care

Jobless Benefits
$43 billion for increased unemployment benefits and job training.
$39 billion to support those who lose their jobs by helping them to pay the cost of keeping their employer provided healthcare under COBRA and providing short-term options to be covered by Medicaid.
$20 billion to increase the food stamp benefit by over 13% in order to help defray rising food costs.

Taxes

Individuals:

*$500 per worker, $1,000 per couple tax cut for two years, costing about $140 billion.
*Greater access to the $1,000-per-child tax credit for the working poor.
*Expansion of the earned-income tax credit to include families with three children
*A $2,500 college tuition tax credit.
*Repeal of a requirement that a $7,500 first-time homebuyer tax credit be paid back over time.

Businesses:

*An infusion of cash into money-losing companies by allowing them to claim tax credits on past profits dating back five years instead of two.
*Bonus depreciation for businesses investing in new plants and equipment
*Doubling of the amount small businesses can write off for capital investments and new equipment purchases.
*Allowing businesses to claim a tax credit for hiring disconnected youth and veterans

[Sources: Associated Press: Highlights of Senate economic stimulus plan; January 23, 2009; WSJ: Stimulus Package Unveiled; January 16, 2009; Committee on Appropriations: January 15, 2009]

When is the money being is going to be spent, and on what?

The government wouldn't be able to spend at least one-fourth of a proposed $825 billion economic stimulus plan until after 2010, according to a preliminary report by the Congressional Business Office that suggests it may take longer than expected to boost the economy. The government would spend about $26 billion of the money this year and $110 billion more next year, the report said. About $103 billion would be spent in 2011, while $53 billion would be spent in 2012 and $63 billion between 2013 and 2019.

• Less than $5 billion of the $30 billion set aside for highway spending would be spent within the next two years, the CBO said.

• Only $26 billion out of $274 billion in infrastructure spending would be delivered into the economy by the Sept. 30 end of the budget year, just 7 percent.

• Just one in seven dollars of a huge $18.5 billion investment in energy efficiency and renewable energy programs would be spent within a year and a half.

• About $907 million of a $6 billion plan to expand broadband access in rural and other underserved areas would be spent by 2011, CBO said.

• Just one-fourth of clean drinking water projects can be completed by October of next year.

• $275 billion worth of tax cuts to 95 percent of filers and a huge infusion of help for state governments is to be distributed into the economy more quickly.

[Note: The CBO's analysis applied only to 40 percent of the overall stimulus bill, and doesn't cover tax cuts or efforts; a CBO report outlining all of its costs is expected in the next week or so.]

• The Obama administration said $3 of every $4 in the package should be spent within 18 months to have maximum impact on jobs and taxpayers; if House or Senate versions of the bill do not spend the money as quickly, the White House will work with lawmakers to achieve the goal of spending 75% of the overall package over the next year and a half.

[Source: AP: Three-quarters of stimulus to go in 18 months; January 22, 2009; Bloomberg News: Much of Stimulus Wont Be Spent Before 2011, CBO Says; January 20, 2009; link]

Who will be spending the money? Will the states be receiving any money to spend, community organizations? Churches?

The economic stimulus plan now moving through Congress would shower billions of federal dollars on state and local governments desperate for cash:

• The House stimulus bill includes an extra $87 billion in federal aid to state Medicaid programs.

• It allots some $120 billion to boost state and city education programs.

• There's $4 billion for state and local anticrime initiatives in the legislation, not to mention $30-plus billion for highways and other infrastructure projects.

• $6.9 billion to help state and local governments make investments that make them more energy efficient and reduce carbon emissions.

• $87 billion to states, increasing through the end of FY 2010 the share of Medicaid costs the Federal government reimburses all states by 4.8 percent, with extra relief tied to rates of unemployment.

• $120 billion to states and school districts to stabilize budgets and prevent tax increases and deep cuts to critical education programs.

Overall, about one-quarter of the entire $825 billion recovery package would be devoted to activities crucial to governors, mayors, and local school boards - making them among the plans biggest beneficiaries.

[Sources: Committee on Appropriations: January 15, 2009; Reuters: Roads, energy, states win in US stimulus plan;15 January 2009; Christian Science Monitor: States to win big in stimulus sweepstakes; House bill allots almost one-quarter of the $825 billion recovery package to states, localities. How will that boost the economy?; January 25, 2009; Link]
 
Obama called for an end of pork barrel politics, so I highly doubt those pundits know jack shit.
He also said he wasn't going to take away guns AND swore to "protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic" (although he did sorta fuck that one up so maybe he's got an out on that one) but he's still got repressive gun control measures on his agenda not a week after taking office. So I'd say he lies as much as any other politician. :bergman:
 
Wow. I had such high hopes for a brief period between November and January. Well, maybe not "high" hopes, but SOME hope. It looks like Obama will be every bit as bad as I feared he would be during the campaign. :bergman:
 
Just like a republican to call the National Endowment for the Arts pork. Sorry, but because you don't like it doesn't make it pork.

Government funds, appointments, or benefits dispensed or legislated by politicians to gain favor with their constituents.
If you are going to call the National Endowment for the Arts pork under that definition, then so is anti-abortion, tax cuts for the rich and companies, faith based initiatives, and every other program ever conceived of by any party ever.

In fact, nothing you've mentioned in this bill raises to the level or pork IMHO.
 
In this context I would submit that it is definitely pork. How will NEA monies provide a significant stimulus for the economy? Will all sorts of artists now run out and spend a bunch on paint and canvas or clay or something? Will PBS networks make a bunch of shows on the Civil War or what antiques are worth? Will a lot of hardhats get jobs building new museums?

Whether or not federal funding should go to the arts is a subject for another debate. Whether arts spending is going to stimulate the economy is what's at hand here. Sure, $50 million is chump change in the context of almost a trillion dollars, but for that matter $1 million is chump change in the context of $50 million. So why not slide a million my way?
 
Just to get help get your head around this thing if, instead of parsing out the money the way it is, they just gave $825,000 (tax-free) to a million Americans that would be how much money we're talking about here.

Alternately, this is enough money to make everyone who lives in Jacksonville Florida (according to Wiki, pop: 805,605) a millionaire and still have enough change leftover to buy a new car. (More, actually, since this is assuming that everyone within the Jacksonville city limits is flat broke.)
 
Didn't Bush already give 800 billion to business and they pissed it away?

We couldn't even give money to people whose houses got blown away in Katrina without getting scammed and screwing it up so bad the place is still a third world country. I can't even imagine how much we'd fuck up trying to give that money to everyone as a tax break.

Let's see, 800 billion divided by the last know population of the US is 2,633.03 cents each. Yeah, that'll save the economy. Everyone gets a month free rent and PRESTO-CHANGO we're all better again.
 
Fuck that. I'm not dividing it up amongst everyone. I'm giving 825,000 people a million dollars.

Anyway, the Bush thing. That sort of intrigues me. It could've been that we don't know all the details he was privvy to. It could also be that it was just one of the stupid, frustrating things Bush did. But the paranoid devious side of me thinks it just set Obama up for a bailout gravy train for anyone who came along with their hat in their hand. :evil:
 
*Repeal of a requirement that a $7,500 first-time homebuyer tax credit be paid back over time.

I'd like to thank all the idiot liberals of TK for giving me $7,500. I'll think of you while I'm on my weekend vacation in Vegas in March. :ramen:
 
Wow.

Republitards are really being critical of this package.

It's about damn time you people actually do your jobs. You had 6 years of blank check bloated spending while you were the majority under Bush. If you would have been as critical of pork spending then, the country might not be in this mess.

Fucking hypocrites.
 
Ah. The "Yeah? Well the other side did it too!" gambit. :techman:

So am I understanding you correctly? Is your position really "Well, Obama may be terrible, but Bush wasn't particularly good either."? :S:
 
Ah. The "Yeah? Well the other side did it too!" gambit. :techman:

So am I understanding you correctly? Is your position really "Well, Obama may be terrible, but Bush wasn't particularly good either."? :S:

No, Bush was just evil. And stupid.

Look, for 6 years, Republicans spent like drunken sailors on their first shore leave at the Bunny Ranch. And now, when the Democrats start doing it, the Republicans claim the moral high ground and start pointing fingers.
 
If Republicans spent like drunken sailors, then Democrats are now spending like drunken bank security guards with keys to the vault.
 
Top