Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

How to do javascript sillyness in vb 3.5.1

RommieSG said:
My brain hurts.

Oh your brain hurts, huh? The chili I made today damn near took us out. The entire Coyote household is in pain right now.

Happy. But in pain.

In the future, I will remember to buy a large size bottle of Tums along with the chili ingredients.
 
CoyoteUgly said:
Oh your brain hurts, huh? The chili I made today damn near took us out. The entire Coyote household is in pain right now.

Happy. But in pain.

In the future, I will remember to buy a large size bottle of Tums along with the chili ingredients.
Anytime CU wants to share his recipe... feel free...

;)
mm
 
CoyoteUgly said:
Oh your brain hurts, huh? The chili I made today damn near took us out. The entire Coyote household is in pain right now.

Happy. But in pain.

In the future, I will remember to buy a large size bottle of Tums along with the chili ingredients.
Sounds better than the breakfast burritos I had for lunch. I'll trade you the tums for some excedrin though. :)
 
Yes, 1 is more than 0. You and pythagoras were great thinkers. Yet, we're talking about actions. Therefore, the scale cannot start at 0. 0 is non-action. You can't be more of a non-action. It's an impossibility. For you to say that I am more of an action than someone else. The action must already exist. Even though it could've existed at such a miniscule scale. Say .0000000001. It still exists.
 
You can retract the statement. Semantics are everyone's territory. What you say can be interpreted as said. Not, by what you intended it to mean. So, would you like to retract your statement, and tell me that he wasn't bothersome at all, and I am in fact incredibly bothersome for trying to prove how much of a bother he was? You can do that.
 
Sardonica said:
But you CAN be more than a non-action.

Quit while you're behind.

What you're trying to say is that I am more (meaning another non-action) than a non-action. That's a contradiction. You can't be more action of a non-action either. I can be something other than a non-action.

You cannot compare non-actions on a scale with actions.
 
Top