Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Israel Warns Iran

jack

The Legendary Troll King
A large Israeli military exercise this month may have been aimed at showing Jerusalem's abilities to attack Iranian nuclear facilities.

In a substantial show of force, Israel sent warplanes and other aircraft on a major exercise in the eastern Mediterranean early this month, U.S. Defense Department officials said Friday.

Israel's military refused to confirm or deny that the maneuvers were practice for a strike in Iran.

Russia's foreign minister Friday warned against the use of force on Iran, saying there is no proof it is trying to build nuclear weapons with the program Tehran said is for generating power.

U.S. officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak on the sensitive matter for the record.

"They have been conducting some large scale exercises — they live in a tough neighborhood," one U.S. official said, though he offered no other recent examples.

The big exercise the first week of June was impossible to miss and may have been meant as a show of force as well as for practice on skills needed to execute a long-range strike mission.

The New York Times quoted U.S. officials Friday saying more than 100 Israeli F-16s and F-15s staged the maneuver, flying more than 900 miles, roughly the distance from Israel to Iran's Natanz nuclear enrichment facility, and that the exercise included refueling tankers and helicopters capable of rescuing downed pilots.

"It was noticed that a significant exercise took place — dozens and dozens of aircraft participated," one of the officials said. "We watch globally everyday, and this was noted."

The second U.S. defense official said the maneuver could be taken as a demonstration to Iran and the international community that Israel is serious about the need to challenge Iran's nuclear program — and could be prepared to do so militarily.

"That's one of the assessments you could make out of the exercise. They (the Israelis), like the rest of the international community, are concerned about Iran, and Iran has told of its hostile intent with respect to the Israelis."

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Iran should be engaged in dialogue and encouraged to cooperate with the U.N. nuclear monitoring agency.

Lavrov made the statement when asked to comment on an Israeli Cabinet member's statement earlier this month that Israel could attack Iran if it does not halt its nuclear program.

"I hope the actual actions would be based on international law," Lavrov said. "And international law clearly protects Iran's and anyone else's territorial integrity."
 
Paroles, Paroles, Paroles.

Iran pretty much surrounded Israel with its proxy militias (Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Sadr militia), and armed them with rockets that can reach the heart of Israel. I don't think Israel is stupid enough to make such a move. St00pid blatant bluff.
 
You're an idiot if you really believe that MDS.

Israel can reduce Iran to ash with a single strike, period.
 
The rest of them are ignorant sandniggers anyway, and aren't organized enough to be any threat at all, coordinated or otherwise.

Why do you think Iran is frantically building centrifuges?

Just wait til the first surgical strike from Israel, don't think they're clueless, or hobbled from taking control of this situation at their whim.
 
Your understanding of Middle Eastern politics is very shitty. I would highly advise you of shutting the fuck up when it comes to a subject you have no clue about, instead of masking your ignorance with frail personal insults.

Israel could not even beat one of Iran's smaller proxy militias in the 2006 July War, and the Israeli war machine suffered from a painful stalemate (if not a defeat) although it fully mobilized its Air Force, and bombed the fuck out of the sand niggers with cluster bombs, smart bombs, and heavy artillery. Result ? Rien, Nada, Zilch, Machi, Nothing.

If it decides to strike Iran, Hell will break loose on its borders.
 
Your understanding of Middle Eastern politics is very shitty. I would highly advise you of shutting the fuck up when it comes to a subject you have no clue about, instead of masking your ignorance with frail personal insults.

Israel could not even beat one of Iran's smaller proxy militias in the 2006 July War, and the Israeli war machine suffered from a painful stalemate (if not a defeat) although it fully mobilized its Air Force, and bombed the fuck out of the sand niggers with cluster bombs, smart bombs, and heavy artillery. Result ? Rien, Nada, Zilch, Machi, Nothing.

If it decides to strike Iran, Hell will break loose on its borders.

Keep dreaming bubbaleh I was visiting Israel on a class trip in '67 when the war broke out, and so far, they've kept every hectare they've taken.

About 2 hours is all it would take to set the "Islamic revolution" back to the time when Buddha was actually alive.

Moron.
 
You're talking about Lebanon, not Iran, btw. You should stick to stuff you know about, I think, and not rant on mindlessly about things you clearly are uninformed about.

The 2006 Lebanon War, known in Lebanon as the July War[18] (Arabic: حرب تموز Ḥarb Tammūz) and in Israel as the Second Lebanon War (Hebrew: מלחמת לבנון השנייה Milkhemet Levanon Ha-Shniya),[19] was a 33-day military conflict in Lebanon and northern Israel. The principal parties were Hezbollah paramilitary forces and the Israeli military. The conflict started on 12 July 2006, and continued until a United Nations-brokered ceasefire went into effect on 14 August 2006, though it formally ended on 8 September 2006 when Israel lifted its naval blockade of Lebanon.

The conflict began when Hezbollah militants fired rockets at Israeli border towns as a diversion for an anti-tank missile attack on two armored Humvees patrolling the Israeli side of the border fence.[20] Of the seven Israeli soldiers in the two jeeps, two were wounded, three were killed, and two were captured and taken to Lebanon.[20] Five more were killed in a failed Israeli rescue attempt. Israel responded with massive airstrikes and artillery fire on targets in Lebanon, which damaged Lebanese civilian infrastructure, including Beirut's Rafic Hariri International Airport which Israel alleged that Hezbollah used to import weapons, an air and naval blockade,[21] and a ground invasion of southern Lebanon. Hezbollah then launched more rockets into northern Israel and engaged the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) in guerrilla warfare from hardened positions.[22]

The conflict killed countless people, most of whom were Lebanese civilians, severely damaged Lebanese infrastructure, and displaced countless Lebanese[23] and 300,000–500,000 Israelis, although most, if not all, were able to return to their homes.[17][24][25] After the ceasefire, some parts of Southern Lebanon remained uninhabitable due to unexploded cluster bomblets.[26]

On 11 August 2006, the United Nations Security Council unanimously approved UN Resolution 1701 in an effort to end the hostilities. The resolution, which was approved by both Lebanese and Israeli governments the following days, called for disarmament of Hezbollah, for withdrawal of Israel from Lebanon, and for the deployment of Lebanese soldiers and an enlarged United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) force in southern Lebanon. The Lebanese army began deploying in southern Lebanon on 17 August 2006. The blockade was lifted on 8 September 2006.[27] On 1 October 2006, most Israeli troops withdrew from Lebanon, though the last of the troops continued to occupy the border-straddling village of Ghajar.[28] In the time since the enactment of UNSCR 1701 both the Lebanese government and UNIFIL have stated that they will not disarm Hezbollah.[29][30][31]

The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) had engaged in cross-border attacks from southern Lebanon into Israel as far back as 1968, and the area became a significant base following the arrival of the PLO leadership and its Fatah brigade after their 1971 expulsion from Jordan. Demographic tensions were running high over the Lebanese National Pact, which divided governmental powers among religious groups, leading in part to the Lebanese Civil War (1975–1990). Concurrently, Syria began a 29 year military occupation. Israel's 1978 invasion of Lebanon failed to stem the Palestinian attacks, but Israel invaded Lebanon again in 1982 and forcibly expelled the PLO.[32] Israel withdrew to a borderland buffer zone in southern Lebanon, held with the aid of proxy militants in the South Lebanon Army (SLA).[33] In 1985, a Lebanese Shi'a militia calling itself Hezbollah declared an armed struggle to end the Israeli occupation of Lebanese territory.[34] When the Lebanese civil war ended and other warring factions agreed to disarm, Hezbollah and the SLA refused. Combat with Hezbollah weakened Israeli resolve and led to a collapse of the SLA and an early Israeli withdrawal in 2000 to their side of the UN designated border. Citing Israeli control of the disputed Shebaa farms region and the incarceration of Lebanese prisoners in Israel, Hezbollah continued cross border attacks, and used the tactic of seizing soldiers from Israel as leverage for a prisoner exchange in 2004,[35] though it also continues to call for Israel's destruction.[36]

Sorry idiot, doesn't look like a loss or a stalemate to me :D
 
PLO doesn't exist anymore, n'est ce pas? And what does Iran have to do with this? Calling Hezbollah an Iranian proxy army truly displays your ignorance of both the conflict and the demography.

Sad, that this is the best you fucking racists can come up with to define the "occupation"

Think ASH, motherfuckers. That's what's coming.
 
Because while Iran is frantically trying to make one bomb (although they have a couple of Korean scuds) Israel has a fully armed nuclear arsenal.

Wish the sandniggers luck, they'll be fucking their virgins in heaven soon enough.
 
Back in 67, the geopolitical map in the Middle East was very different. Israel, back then, had no real opposition in its entourage; was backed by colonialist powers (mainly the British), and no real threat was posed to its existence. The very few idealist Arabs (like Jamal Abdel Nasser) who tried to transcend their reality as mere puppets for foreign regimes got their asses handed to them by Israel's superior firepower (namely the notorious ISF).

Wake up, old fart, we're not in the sixties anymore. Israel now suffers from structural problems, a threat of an internal demographic implosion (with the number of Israeli-Arabs growing at a faster rate than the j00z), and is getting embarrassed and occasionally humiliated by guerillas. Israel got buttraped by a fucking militia, it cannot afford to go to war with a major regional power that could threaten the very existence of Israel and the downfall of modern economy.

Iran has forced the USA and Israel to negociate over Iraq, Iran forced Israel to get the fuck out Lebanon. The Assad Regime (Syria), a main ally of Syria, that Israel and the USA "threatened" to "wipe out" by the end of 2005, is alive and kicking, and it's been three years they've been threatening to "strike" Israel, hoping to be taken seriously by naive halfwits such as yourself.
 
Bullshit. The ENTIRE Arab world (how many countries?) supposedly "coordinated" a planned attack to wipe Israel off the face of the earth. I wouldn't expect you to be familiar with the etiology, your dad was still carrying you around in his nutsac.

They weren't aware of either the will or the military strength they encountered.

6 days as I recall, and on the 7th, they rested :D

And yes darling, things are much different now. It won't be just Gaza they'll annex in the next round, count on that. It'll be a whole new Geography, come the Revolution :D

Hey, maybe Iran could instigate some more suicide bombers, that worked well before, didn't it?
 
Sorry idiot, doesn't look like a loss or a stalemate to me :D

You're making a complete joke out of yourself. The Israelis themselves admitted their defeat. I was being generous in calling it a stalemate.


Wiki said:
Initially, in a poll by an Israeli radio station, Israelis were split on the outcome with the majority believing that no one won.[195] By 25 August, 63% of Israelis polled wanted Olmert to resign due to his handling of the war.[196]

Israeli Prime Minister Olmert admitted to the Knesset that there were mistakes in the war in Lebanon,[197] though he framed UN Security Council resolution 1701 as an accomplishment for Israel that would bring home the seized soldiers, and said that the operations had altered the regional strategic balance vis-à-vis Hezbollah.[198] Israeli chief of staff Dan Halutz admitted to failings in the conflict.[199] On 15 August, Israeli government and defense officials called for Halutz' resignation following a stock scandal in which he admitted selling stocks hours before the start of the Israeli offensive.[200] Halutz subsequently resigned 17 January 2007 due to criticism of his conduct during the war.

On 21 August, a group of demobilized Israel reserve soldiers and parents of soldiers killed in the fighting started a movement calling for the resignation of Ehud Olmert and the establishment of a state commission of inquiry. They set up a protest tent opposite the Knesset and grew to over 2,000 supporters by 25 August,[201] including the influential Movement for Quality Government.[202][201] On 28 August, Olmert announced that there would be no independent state or governmental commission of inquiry, but two internal inspection probes, one to investigate the political echelon and one to examine IDF, and likely a third commission to examine the Home Front, to be announced at a later date. These would have a more limited mandate and less authority than a single inquiry commission headed by a retired judge.[203] The political and military committees were to be headed by former director of Mossad Nahum Admoni and former Chief of Staff Amnon Lipkin-Shahak, respectively. Critics argued that these committees amount to a whitewash, due to their limited authority, limited investigatory scope, their self-appointed basis, and that neither would be headed by a retired judge.[204]

Due to these pressures, on 11 October, Admoni was replaced by retired justice Eliyahu Winograd as chair of the political probe, and the probe itself was elevated to the status of governmental commission with near-state commission mandate: the Winograd Commission. On 12 September, former defense minister Moshe Arens spoke of "the defeat of Israel" in calling for a state committee of inquiry. He said that Israel had lost "to a very small group of people, 5000 Hezbollah fighters, which should have been no match at all for the IDF," and stated that the conflict could have "some very fateful consequences for the future."[citation needed] Disclosing his intent to shortly resign, Ilan Harari, the IDF's chief education officer, stated at a conference of senior IDF officers that Israel lost the war, becoming the first senior active duty officer to publicly state such an opinion.[205] IDF Major General Yiftah Ron Tal, on 4 October 2006 became the second and highest ranking serving officer to express his opinion that the IDF failed "to win the day in the battle against Hezbollah," as well as calling for Lt. Gen. Dan Halutz' resignation.[206] Ron-Tal was subsequently fired for making those and other critical comments.[207] Hezbollah was quick to use the findings of the report to bolster its claims of victory over the vastly superior Israeli military and to criticize the Lebanese government's handling of the conflict.[208]
 
:yawn: I didn't read failure into any of that. You wouldn't expect an entire nation that has developed PTSD because the entire arab world has called for their destruction daily since 1948 to be happy with any of this, did you?

Your racism is showing.
 
Boy, three months passes pretty quickly in your little world, doesn't it?

ASH I tell you. Ash and sand.
 
Bullshit. The ENTIRE Arab world (how many countries?) supposedly "coordinated" a planned attack to wipe Israel off the face of the earth. I wouldn't expect you to be familiar with the etiology, your dad was still carrying you around in his nutsac.

You completely lost the plot. If there was a reason for Jamal Abdul Nasser and company's epic failures, it's precisely the lack of coordination. And how is my birth date relevant to the discussion ? (NewsFlash : This thread is about Israel "striking" Iran, not the sixties)


And yes darling, things are much different now. It won't be just Gaza they'll annex in the next round, count on that. It'll be a whole new Geography, come the Revolution :D

Hey, maybe Iran could instigate some more suicide bombers, that worked well before, didn't it?

Iran's military model relies mainly on guerilla warfare and hit and run tactics. Suicide bombings are perpetrated by such Groups as the Phalanges of Ezzedine al Kassam, and other groups that are rather Syrian-backed. For your own sake, stop blabbering when obviously you have no clue about what you are talking about.

Militias who are "sponsored" by Iran and trained by its revolutionary guard adopt much more complex warfare tactics than suicide bombings, and benefit from much better weapons. Israel's newest Merkava model, that was supposed to kick ass and take names, was a sitting duck during the July War.
 
Wish the sandniggers luck, they'll be fucking their virgins in heaven soon enough.

Your racism is showing.



19515.jpg
 
I dunno Marquis, I only brought up age because you did. You call me an old fart, and use ageism against me as a troll, and I'll point out that I was alive and experiencing things in real time that you "study" revisionism in the guise of historical fact about.

The Israeli's were supposed to be destroyed in the 60's war. Funny how that turned out, eh?

Other than that, all the sabre rattling in the world is meaningless. Israel will take the next step, and the sand will burn.

It will be that hot.
 
Top