The Dork Lord
Whipping Boy
It's a shame we have all this conspiracy nonsense distracting from all the wonderful spam in this thread...
Troll Kingdom
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Michael Moore: 9/11 Could Be Inside Job
- Thread starter Tyrant
- Start date
Kim Nyholm
courtesy of VDK
jack said:
Yeah, what a shame I interrupted this group therapy session for mentally-challenged adults. I think I understand why you like it here, Vap: in the land of the brain-dead, the retarded man is king.
So Vap, do you have any more pig-ignorant opinions about geopolitics? What about Hugo Chavez: is he or isn't he a Martian?
jack
The Legendary Troll King
Kim Nyholm said:
sure :bigass:
Read it and weep, stupid
Here's the kicker for the "argument" we had, darling
Bin Laden sends fighters to Soviet Georgia....and kicks the Russians ass in the process...hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
That means he helped the Georgians with training and guns, the same guns and training we gave him. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Is that your shit on my dick, again Mr. Hunchback, sir?
Well, well... Some simple things to clear up methinks:
First of all as to having explosives and THERMATE in the buildings (this is all but proven from forensic analysis by Prof. Steven Jones) you have to ask the question.. why not?
Those buildings would have been very unlikely to fall even after having planes slam into them, so as Jack said, they would have been standing up there and the loss of life would have been drastically reduced since most of those in the buildings would have been able to escape or be rescued.
Remember the incubator babies that didn't exist from the first Gulf War? You have to make sure that the public is truly shocked, outraged and in fear. Huge loss of life is the best way to achieve that.
The Project for the New American Century provides a road-map to Iraq and beyond.
A year later they would get their wish.
And really, when people ask questions like "Then where is flight 77?" and "why would they put explosives in the buildings?" they are asking simply the wrong questions. And how in the hell are we supposed to know those answers? In fact it's completley irrelevant and pointless to SPECULATE on such questions. To do so would be truly conjuring up conspiracy theories now wouldn't it?
Because those who believe that 9/11 was an inside job are not conspiracy theorists. We are not dealing in theory. There is a huge amount of physical and documented evidence. And when you're dealing with evidence it becomes a conspiracy possibility. And the more evidence you get the more likely and probable a conspiracy becomes.
For those who don't believe that elements of the government are responsible or even capable of false flag terrorism I pity you. You must lead some damn sheltered lives. I suppose that when the twin towers were attacked in '93 and the CIA was caught on fucking tape giving their asset real explosives to give to the hapless terrorists that were involved unwittingly in a sting operation that suddenly went "live" is just an afterthought... hmm?
What about the USS Liberty? The Reichstag? Mosadeq? ....err.... OPERATION NORTHWOODS?
When you're dealing with 9/11 you have to ask questions that should have been answered yet are ignored constantly to this day.
Why didn't the mighty U.S Airforce intercept a single plane that day? As SOON as a plane loses contact with ATC it is procedure to contact the Air Force. St. Andrews Base is 12 miles from the White House. Yet coincidentally NORAD was involved in a large series of exercises that was dealing with planes being hijacked across the United States. Yet more F-16's were sent off to Canada for more war games exercises. Those exercises involved fake radar blips being displayed confusing both ground control and the pilots when suddenly they were dealing with an exercise that went live. For not one interception to be made and to blame that solely on incompetence is nothing short of fanciful. Those "hijacked" planes went wildly off course and yet not one of them was met by air defense? Sure.
Same thing happened in London on 7/7. A company that is involved in crisis management was running exercises that involved the exact tube stations and London busses being hit by bombs. Then all of a sudden much to their surprise the EXACT thing they were in a drill for went live.
If you're running a drill then you have all your resources working for you. Most of which are unaware that they are involved in anything but a drill. Even when the attack goes live they are unaware that they might have been involved in some capacity.
HMMM...
If you bother to actually truly study what happened and what is PUBLIC RECORD and not even contested then no reasonable human being can say that we have been told the truth by either the British or the American government as far as the major attacks that happened.
And I haven't even mentioned WTC7. I'm sure someone has a good explanation why that building dropped in free-fall speed into it's own footprint for no reason whatsoever?
How about the hundreds of eyewitness reports of bombs in the buildings? Firefighters, police officers? I guess they're just lying?
Why did the buildings collapse from the TOP? That's a bit odd, no?
And what about this?
This footage was shown ONCE by CNN on 9/11. It has never been shown since. Keep in mind that both buildings are still standing. Neither one has collapsed or started to collapse. Yet there is a 50 story high plume of smoke emanating from the ground just to the left of the towers. This is corroborated by seismic information from the day that showed multiple anomalies.
There are literally hundreds-and-hundreds of problems with the official report. It's not mine or anyone else's place to support our position (though we do it anyway.)
Nope, I'm afraid that these questions and hundreds more need to be answered. Yet still they are not answered even though victims from that day and those who lost people in the towers are demanding it alongside thousand's of others.
I guess it's easier to paint people as wacked out tinfoil hat wearing lunatics. Well, you're being good globalist citizens by refusing to ask the hard questions since you're either with the government or a terrorist right?
It was an inside job. It's patently obvious. The conspiracy theory is that a bunch of guys in a cave managed to pull such an attack off. Maybe they willed WTC7 down!
And hey, we have two wars still on-going. Massive miltary spending. Regime change in Iraq and access to not only the trillions in oil but also to strategic land where we've been building up bases steadily for four years.
And of course we have the Patriot Act as well and similar "legistlation" in the U.K and across Europe. That wipes its ass rather blatantly with the Constitution doesn't it?
It's a Neo-Con wet dream. The exact same one that they outlined a year before. Peachy keen!
Liberty and freedom? -- Not before Security apparently. Security dictated by the government that is.
Some people really need to open their fucking eyes.
Click:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFhNmhu-GNI
First of all as to having explosives and THERMATE in the buildings (this is all but proven from forensic analysis by Prof. Steven Jones) you have to ask the question.. why not?
Those buildings would have been very unlikely to fall even after having planes slam into them, so as Jack said, they would have been standing up there and the loss of life would have been drastically reduced since most of those in the buildings would have been able to escape or be rescued.
Remember the incubator babies that didn't exist from the first Gulf War? You have to make sure that the public is truly shocked, outraged and in fear. Huge loss of life is the best way to achieve that.
The Project for the New American Century provides a road-map to Iraq and beyond.
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor..."
-- from "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century," September, 2000. .
And really, when people ask questions like "Then where is flight 77?" and "why would they put explosives in the buildings?" they are asking simply the wrong questions. And how in the hell are we supposed to know those answers? In fact it's completley irrelevant and pointless to SPECULATE on such questions. To do so would be truly conjuring up conspiracy theories now wouldn't it?
Because those who believe that 9/11 was an inside job are not conspiracy theorists. We are not dealing in theory. There is a huge amount of physical and documented evidence. And when you're dealing with evidence it becomes a conspiracy possibility. And the more evidence you get the more likely and probable a conspiracy becomes.
For those who don't believe that elements of the government are responsible or even capable of false flag terrorism I pity you. You must lead some damn sheltered lives. I suppose that when the twin towers were attacked in '93 and the CIA was caught on fucking tape giving their asset real explosives to give to the hapless terrorists that were involved unwittingly in a sting operation that suddenly went "live" is just an afterthought... hmm?
What about the USS Liberty? The Reichstag? Mosadeq? ....err.... OPERATION NORTHWOODS?
When you're dealing with 9/11 you have to ask questions that should have been answered yet are ignored constantly to this day.
Why didn't the mighty U.S Airforce intercept a single plane that day? As SOON as a plane loses contact with ATC it is procedure to contact the Air Force. St. Andrews Base is 12 miles from the White House. Yet coincidentally NORAD was involved in a large series of exercises that was dealing with planes being hijacked across the United States. Yet more F-16's were sent off to Canada for more war games exercises. Those exercises involved fake radar blips being displayed confusing both ground control and the pilots when suddenly they were dealing with an exercise that went live. For not one interception to be made and to blame that solely on incompetence is nothing short of fanciful. Those "hijacked" planes went wildly off course and yet not one of them was met by air defense? Sure.
Same thing happened in London on 7/7. A company that is involved in crisis management was running exercises that involved the exact tube stations and London busses being hit by bombs. Then all of a sudden much to their surprise the EXACT thing they were in a drill for went live.
If you're running a drill then you have all your resources working for you. Most of which are unaware that they are involved in anything but a drill. Even when the attack goes live they are unaware that they might have been involved in some capacity.
HMMM...
If you bother to actually truly study what happened and what is PUBLIC RECORD and not even contested then no reasonable human being can say that we have been told the truth by either the British or the American government as far as the major attacks that happened.
And I haven't even mentioned WTC7. I'm sure someone has a good explanation why that building dropped in free-fall speed into it's own footprint for no reason whatsoever?
How about the hundreds of eyewitness reports of bombs in the buildings? Firefighters, police officers? I guess they're just lying?
Why did the buildings collapse from the TOP? That's a bit odd, no?
And what about this?
This footage was shown ONCE by CNN on 9/11. It has never been shown since. Keep in mind that both buildings are still standing. Neither one has collapsed or started to collapse. Yet there is a 50 story high plume of smoke emanating from the ground just to the left of the towers. This is corroborated by seismic information from the day that showed multiple anomalies.
There are literally hundreds-and-hundreds of problems with the official report. It's not mine or anyone else's place to support our position (though we do it anyway.)
Nope, I'm afraid that these questions and hundreds more need to be answered. Yet still they are not answered even though victims from that day and those who lost people in the towers are demanding it alongside thousand's of others.
I guess it's easier to paint people as wacked out tinfoil hat wearing lunatics. Well, you're being good globalist citizens by refusing to ask the hard questions since you're either with the government or a terrorist right?
It was an inside job. It's patently obvious. The conspiracy theory is that a bunch of guys in a cave managed to pull such an attack off. Maybe they willed WTC7 down!
And hey, we have two wars still on-going. Massive miltary spending. Regime change in Iraq and access to not only the trillions in oil but also to strategic land where we've been building up bases steadily for four years.
And of course we have the Patriot Act as well and similar "legistlation" in the U.K and across Europe. That wipes its ass rather blatantly with the Constitution doesn't it?
It's a Neo-Con wet dream. The exact same one that they outlined a year before. Peachy keen!
Liberty and freedom? -- Not before Security apparently. Security dictated by the government that is.
Some people really need to open their fucking eyes.
Click:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFhNmhu-GNI
Kim Nyholm
courtesy of VDK
jack said:
You're pig ignorant about geopolitics because you seem to think the Chechens are Georgians, which they are not; also, you think that bin Laden helped eject the Soviet army from Soviet Georgia, which is laughable.
Now, please stop trying to convince people that you're anything other than a moron; it's embarrassing.
Kim Nyholm
courtesy of VDK
I'm still waiting for Vap to cut & paste some paragraph about how Soviet Georgia and Chechnya were both part of the Khanate of Astrakhan in the 18th Century, and are therefore the same country, thereby proving his point about bin Laden chasing the Soviet Army out of Soviet Georgia.....
Kim Nyholm
courtesy of VDK
Tyrant said:
I appreciate your input, and will take this mater under advisement.
Eggs Mayonnaise
All In With The Nuts
I haven't had sigs turned on since the late fifties.
jack
The Legendary Troll King
Hey Danny...notice the conspicuous absence of Elrod, when Gianni got DC'ed?? Been kinda quiet around here lately. Reminds me of that old Simon and Garfunkel song....
Hello Elrod, my old friend
I've come to pwn you once again
Because a vision softly creeping
Left its seeds while I was sleeping
And the vision that was planted in my brain
Still remains
within the sound of silence
On another note, I set the hook, and you bite it, hard.
I guess that's better than sucking it, eh Hunchie?
Hello Elrod, my old friend
I've come to pwn you once again
Because a vision softly creeping
Left its seeds while I was sleeping
And the vision that was planted in my brain
Still remains
within the sound of silence
On another note, I set the hook, and you bite it, hard.
I guess that's better than sucking it, eh Hunchie?
The Dork Lord
Whipping Boy
I'm still confused on how you take over a plane with a few BOX CUTTERS...
Kim Nyholm
courtesy of VDK
jack said:
You set the hook by revealing your colossal ignorance? I don't get it...how exactly does that work?
In the meantime, let's review:
1. bin Laden did NOT chase the Russians out of Soviet Georgia
2. Tony Hendra did NOT invent neck-fucking
3. "sunsequent," hilarious as it is, is NOT actually a word
4. Chechnya and Georgia are NOT the same country
In other words:
VAP DON'T KNOW CRAP.
headvoid said:
I could just say the same about you to be fair. And when you have a blatant cover-up and refusual to answer simple yet essential questions and instead get a fictional account of what happened as outlined by the Commision Report you have to stop getting rammed by the mainstream media and start to see that we've been fed lie-after-lie.
And I will also mention that I haven't "swallowed' anything about 9/11. I've done my own, frankly extensive, research to see how probably LiHOP and MiHOP scenarios are. Because the offical account is laughable. And what I have found is that 'Made it Happen On Purpose" is the glove that fits.
There are too many HARD FACTS that completley fly in the face of the official account of what happened. I can't possibly ignore that and brush the blatant evidence that conclusivley shows that what we have been constantly told to accept, fear and acquiesce our freedoms to fight for the rest of eternity is complete and total bollocks.
Now pass the tinfoil hat.