What's new
Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

MJ's kids not his OR Debbie Rowe's biological children!!

Big Dick McGee

Big Dick McGee

If you don't know, now ya know
WTF?? And he never adopted them. I bet his horrible father tries to cut them out of the will!
 
Wasn't that already known?
 
I figured they weren't his, but thought two of them were hers.
 
I didn't know it. He had said before that he donated the sperm (in the 2003 special with that paki Bashir, he explicitly stated the kids were his and Debbie's) and that his third kid was done the same way. TMZ treated it as shocking and breaking news.
 
Even the most stupid of people should have figured out that they were not his biological children. Nevertheless he was their father.

Debbie is meant to be the biological mother of Prince and Paris but not Blanket. This is the first I've heard that Debbie might not be their mother either.

I find that hard to believe and would be surprised if that was the case.
 
Big Dick McGee said:
WTF?? And he never adopted them. I bet his horrible father tries to cut them out of the will!
Click to expand...


Michael got there first it seems. Apparently Joseph is cut out of his will already.
 
Well, even though it's TMZ reporting it, I am starting to believe them as much as I do "legitimate" news sources. They've been right on every other count as far as MJ and Farrah are concerned.

Basically, the story claims that all 3 kids were a product of in vitro fertilization, so Debbie Rowe was simply a surrogate. But the sperm was not Michael's.

http://www.tmz.com/2009/06/30/michael-jackson-debbie-rowe-surrogate-children-in-vitro/
 
As much as I hate to admit it TMZ has proved itself recently to be on the ball with pretty much everything. The Sun has been shockingly bad through this whole thing printing a whole lot of crap that even TMZ has been sneering at on the other hand.

As far as I know there shouldn't be any legal repercussions even if she isn't the mother. I seriously doubt she is going to attempt to get in to a custody battle with Katherine. Would certainly be a pretty big twist though.

I think the kids should be looked after by either Jermaine or Tito. They both have kids of their own and they can give them stable loving homes. Katherine is 79 and kids are a handful even if you are mega welathy and frankly I don't think the idea of having them under the care of Joseph is such a stellar idea and I'm pretty damn sure Mike would agree. :hmmm:
 
Give them to David Gest.
 
I'm surprised they children aren't Michael's but not at all surprised they're not Debbie Rowe's children. Those children are very good looking and Debbie Rowe just isn't. God bless her for being the surrogate and all but ick.
 
Well it is possible for a black person and a white person to have a white child.
 
I don't understand why he named two of them "Prince Michael" (I know the second is "Blanket", but it must still piss off the first Prince Michael.
 
Germaine gave his wacky names too, didn't he? It's just a thing.
 
^^Jaffar....and JERMAJESTY.

LOL.

BTW, MJ's son's are actually named "Michael Joseph Jackson, Jr." and "Michael Joseph Jackson, III". Prince is just a nickname like Blanket.
 
Im gonna have a kid just so I can name it WAFFLE IRON.
 
the only times I ever saw pix of the kids they had blankets or veils on and I WAS THE ONLY ONE ON THE PLANET WHO DIDNT KNOW THEY WERENT HIS BIOLOGICAL KIDS, OK?

as Cassie pointed out, kids can be white if the darker parent has a recessive gene for lighter melanine, so I never gave it another thought.
 
I bet Family Guy will rush some lame "controversial" joke about his death to air.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top