Menu
What's new
Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Moxkforums.net

Seph said:
you are a shit mod
Click to expand...

6755.imgcache.gif
 
eloisel said:
Interesting. By your own accounting, then, I have at least part ownership of you.

P.S. You and your son might enjoy Expendables 2 if he is old enough to handle all the violence. The old action stars did a good job in this film.
Click to expand...

You figure wrong, cranky gringa octegenarian. Eloisel's particular psychosis is an entirely different one than jack's with an entirely different set of rules for ownership. His desperation lies in wanting respect; Eloisel's is in wanting interaction. She must be very lonely. She has a small portion of my pity.
 
Psst... Donovan. Like your fuck buddy, Ding! No one gives a fuck. Seriously. You have a sick obsession, along with Flag, Cody and the rest of the losers who think they're doing the world a favor by "getting jack off the internet". Years, yes by your own admission it's been years that you're trying this. How's that working out for you? Jack's still around and the bunch of you do nothing but follow who you think is jack (if it's not him with his own name posting) all over the net "getting rid of him".

Have any of you even noticed no one gives a shit about your over-used tirade? You're boring people sweetie.
 
jack said:
Yep. :bigass:
Click to expand...

In order to truly understand the lesson of the frog and scorpion (or turtle and snake, or any other variation thereof)The question one must ask is this: who learns from the behavior of both frog and scorpion?

It isn't the scorpion. His behavior throughout the story indicates he not only knows he will betray the frog midway across, but that he is also well aware that his betrayal is something that will lead to his own destruction, YET HE STILL CAN'T STOP HIMSELF FROM SETTING UP THE CIRCUMSTANCES TO DESTROY HIMSELF. Does he refuse a ride? Does he warn the frog that he cannot be trusted? Is he surprised at his own self-destructive act midstream? No. He shrugs and dies, as if he knew his fate was completely beyond his own control.

This is jack. He knows full well his acts are self-destructive, and he has been drowned many times before this. But he cannot or will not stop himself from committing the same acts that cause him the same problems over and over.

If I wanted to get more literary, and if I thought this crowd could handle it, I'd call jack Milton's Satan, incapable of humility and learning from his folly and therefore doomed to crawl at the feet of men. But the comparison would be misrepresented as some sort of compliment by jack, so we won't go there. I could also mention that jack is a fine example of Nietzche's philosophies on the nature of man, but then he might accuse me of sharing my account or something.

So if the scorpion learns nothing, does the frog become the subject who must learn from the fable? He too shows that he completely understands the scorpion will betray him, sooner or later. He even predicts exactly how the betrayal will happen. But does he do the simple act of self-preservation by refusing to grant a ride? No. He willingly accepts his own imminent death, knowing full well what will happen, and therefore learns nothing. There are people here who fit this bill, but it's not my job to point them out.

If you need to figure out what the lesson of the frog and scorpion is, simply answer the question of who is doing the learning. Therein lies the answer of how I have successfully directed jack at a number of targets over the years, pretty much without any effort at all.

Of course it doesn't reveal what I'm up to right now, but that'll be my little secret...
 
Pandora Spox said:
Psst... Donovan. Like your fuck buddy, Ding! No one gives a fuck. Seriously. You have a sick obsession, along with Flag, Cody and the rest of the losers who think they're doing the world a favor by "getting jack off the internet". Years, yes by your own admission it's been years that you're trying this. How's that working out for you? Jack's still around and the bunch of you do nothing but follow who you think is jack (if it's not him with his own name posting) all over the net "getting rid of him".

Have any of you even noticed no one gives a shit about your over-used tirade? You're boring people sweetie.
Click to expand...

Did I say I wanted jack gone from the internet? Jack isn't my opponent, he's more like my chesspiece. I wouldn't say pawn exactly, but definitely a rook or bishop. (if you're having trouble following the analogy, he's like my "kinged" checker piece or the "old maid" card. Or a shiny pokemon, whatever.)

What I said was, I've known jack online for years. At times he has been a friend. Other times not. Why do you care so much? Retard Haven not meeting your needs for online interaction?
 
Ding spends a lot of time giving Dono props, when as Dr Robustus (before that got slagged) he hounded Donovan endlessly as another jack sock.

Kind of funny how all this stuff moves around. Reminds me of something some dumbass said in an earlier thread. "Dont bring a checkerboard to a chess game" Probably meant "don't play chess with checkers' but he was in a hurry since the boards for both games are the same. :bigass: Probably has some tired (yet endlessly detailed) analogy for that rather simple fable. Trolling is fun, I think. Look how effortlessly some people dance for me.

Think about how fucking dumb that really is (the checkerboard comment). Really fucking dumb. Like bringing a knife to a gunfight actually.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top