My Dog

[Alex Buchet]

Sarek needs Messenger to defend him! ROFL

 

[Sarek]

It got the intended response out of you, which was pathetically narcissistic and persnickety.

Well, why don't we just make it easy and say every time I respond to one of your posts, I've been pwned.

It'll make it easier on you that way.

 

[Alex Buchet]

Sounds easy.

 

[Elrod]

Well, why don't we just make it easy and say every time I respond to one of your posts, I've been pwned.

I thought that was what being "pwned" meant.

 

[Sarek]

I thought that was what being "pwned" meant.

That's your problem. You had a thought.

It's a message board. Do we really want to go into a discussion on the dynamics of how one works?

 

[Alex Buchet]

Yes.

 

[Elrod]

That's your problem. You had a thought.

Really? I must be the first one here to do that.

 

[Sarek]

Really? I must be the first one here to do that.

Nope. There's a few equally as dumb retards floating around TK that have tried to argue the whole, "you replied, you got pwned" thing.

We just politely explain to them the errors of their ways and send them back to whatever grade school type site they originated from. Generally with instructions to graduate before they come back to TK.

 

[Elrod]

Nope. There's a few equally as dumb retards floating around TK that have tried to argue the whole, "you replied, you got pwned" thing.

We just politely explain to them the errors of their ways and send them back to whatever grade school type site they originated from. Generally with instructions to graduate before they come back to TK.

Or you give them their own retarded sub-forum, where they proclaim themselves King.

 

[Tyrant]

Or you give them their own retarded sub-forum, where they proclaim themselves King.

A subforum can't be retarded. The posters make their own beds and lie in them.

 

[Sarek]

Or you give them their own retarded sub-forum, where they proclaim themselves King.

Jack may be many things but retarded isn't one of them. After all, using your logic regarding pwnage, just like following a post with a reply, he was crafty enough there to make you all follow him here.

 

[Elrod]

your logic regarding pwnage

It's not my logic, it's Jack's... he was the first one to "explain" it to me.

 

[jack]

I never explained it to you like that.

 

[Sarek]

It's not my logic, it's Jack's... he was the first one to "explain" it to me.

That still doesn't negate the fact that YOU followed HIM here.

 

[jack]

Take this thread, for example (and the pyramid threads in the gutters)

What I intended to have happen in both these posting instances is exactly what happened.

That's how you're "pwned" not by responding, but by responding the way I want you to

 

[Alex Buchet]

That still doesn't negate the fact that YOU followed HIM here.

Sarek, you need to learn to keep more than one statement in your mind at a time. By jack's logic, replying to someone's post constitutes "pwnage," therefore, in your interpretation, by that logic, following jack into his forum to reply to him constitutes "pwnage."

This logic is, on its face, ridiculous. When I, or Elrod, or someone who isn't nuts employs it, the intention is farce.

Got it?

 

[Kim Nyholm]

Did it scare you when Messenger said he had posted your phone number in the "secret forum"?

It scares me when I think about you cornholing that poor dog...please stop doing it.

 

[Tyrant]

^This guys been following him for years.

Do you really want to end up like him?

 

[Alex Buchet]

This is entertainment. What other reason could there be to engage in this idiocy?

 

[Sarek]

Sarek, you need to learn to keep more than one statement in your mind at a time. By jack's logic, replying to someone's post constitutes "pwnage," therefore, in your interpretation, by that logic, following jack into his forum to reply to him constitutes "pwnage."

This logic is, on its face, ridiculous. When I, or Elrod, or someone who isn't nuts employs it, the intention is farce.

Got it?

Are you sure you're not French?