Menu
What's new
Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Obama says despite shortcomings of Bush administration, impeachment is not acceptable

Eggs Mayonnaise said:
At times like this, nothing short of revolution will change things in Washington. Those fat-assed suits have completely lost touch, on both sides, and expecting something to change without the Prez committing an armed robbery is just naive.
Click to expand...

I can agree with this.
 
Laker_Girl said:
ROTFLMMFAO!!!!!!!!!!! You funny lady!!!

If the Dems could impeach Bush they would do it if he had two days left in office. Bush has done nothing impeachable. Never in my life have a witnessed a bleeding heart liberal in any form take the high road.

And I seriously don't know who I'm voting for, I'm not liking the Republican candidates and I'm not so thrilled with the Dems either. All I know is that A) I'm glad I'll be married come election day, it's a miracle and B) if Hillary gets elected I'll be living with curiousa2z.
Click to expand...

I love you, but you're still a fucking idiot.
 
Eggs Mayonnaise said:
Fuck you, nobody knows better than I do that our Prez and VP are criminals, that the balance of power is ruined and that the Consitution is basically now toilet paper.

But who the fuck is going to listen in Washington so that something tangible and swift can be done to bring the perps to justice? Evidence comes out all the time and is ignored.

At times like this, nothing short of revolution will change things in Washington. Those fat-assed suits have completely lost touch, on both sides, and expecting something to change without the Prez committing an armed robbery is just naive.

Change things with your vote this time. Like we should have in 04, and did but not enough in 06.
Click to expand...

Yeah like voting makes any difference, with bitches like Coulter Girl doing the counting.
 
BitchSlapSmitty said:
Let me get back to you, but until then, who are you gonna vote for and why?
Click to expand...
Ron Paul. At first I was going to vote for Mike Gravel, despite some of his left-leaning stances.

He has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.

He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.

He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.
Click to expand...
Paul began his medical practice in Lake Jackson, Texas, as a specialist in obstetrics and gynecology, delivering more than 4,000 babies. He took over the practice of a retiring doctor and was busy as the only obstetrician and gynecologist in Brazoria County. Paul said of his time as a doctor, "I delivered forty to fifty babies a month and did a lot of surgery."

Dr. Paul did not accept Medicare or Medicaid as a physician; instead, he would do the work for free or work at a greatly lowered payment or payment plan for needy patients.
Click to expand...

If you have a decent connection and can watch Youtube, here's a clip:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hfa7vT02lA




RonPaul_flag.jpg




I'd say I like a lot of his solutions, his honesty and common sense, and his refusal to approach problems in a mindless, flag-waving manner, and take a look at the real reasons behind them. I agree with practically everything he's said.


Me said:
People who know my opinions here know that I have some unorthdox views on relations between races... one or two differing points.

I have since that time changed and refined my perspective in a way I didn't imagine before. Dr. Paul puts emphasis on people deserving rights as individuals.

"A [?] of opportunity should be afforded to all Americans regardless of race, color, creed, sexual orientation, or gender identity or expression."

"I would do all that with ignoring all those words. Because that means, that confuses everything. I think there's only one group you have to worry about, and that's the human race.

Every individual deserves rights because they're an individual and not because of their race or gender or anything else. I think it really confuses things. The main thing is you don't use any force; you can't prohibit people from doing things and denying them rights because they belong to a certain group, but because someone belongs to a certain group they can't force themselves on others. I want a voluntary arrangement. There should be no force used, and no prohibitions."
Click to expand...
 
Every individual deserves rights because they're an individual and not because of their race or gender or anything else. I think it really confuses things. The main thing is you don't use any force; you can't prohibit people from doing things and denying them rights because they belong to a certain group, but because someone belongs to a certain group they can't force themselves on others. I want a voluntary arrangement. There should be no force used, and no prohibitions."
Click to expand...
There goes the Black and Latino vote...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top