Riddle me this about RWC?

[Blue Meanie]

Oooh, looks like somebody just got 'pwn3d'.

 

[Sarek]

And headvoid posted a screen cap of your deeds as proof of... what were your words again?

"Apperantly it doesn't take much to keep them amused."

That should be funny, but it isn't. It's kind of sad the way you insist on deriding others for things you yourself are guilty of and quickly hiding behind hypocrisy with the weak and easy "just because I'm guilty doesn't mean I'm not right". Maybe you should employ some of that pop-psychology you pretend to know and explore your mixed feelings, see where they take you. <cough::gaybar::cough>

It amazing how you carry on a conversation with no clue as to the content of said converstaion. I said the ability to give someone negative Karma serves a purpose. Repetatively giving someone negative karma serves none.

There's also the quantity issue. 12 hits in five minutes is one thing. Hours and hours spent over a weeks time is an obsession.

My statement was predicated on the belief that you were implying that I was Ogami, and I most definitely indicated there was a chance I was mistaken which is why I qualified my statement with one little word: "if" as in "If that's the case, you're wrong". That makes me neither an idiot nor an ego maniac. It does however show your penchant for puerile insults, poor communication skills and Freud. <cough::homo::cough>

So the bottom line to everything with you is 'I'm right, you're wrong because I said so."

Doesn't really mean much I guess. The proof of your stupidity is pasted all over TK.

And headvoid posted proof that you're twelve times the idiot you pretend me to be. Good luck finding proof that I've neg rep'd anyone 12 times in a row, genius.

See above statement.

Why you attempt to debate me when you clearly lose each and every time.

Bacause I like to LMAO over your lame attempts to justify both your penchant for being an asshole and your displayes of "extreme intelligence" that seem to come from the dumbest worker in a fortune cookie factory.

Why you think calling someone "idiot", "ass clown" and "twat face" is more clever than "douche", "pussy" and "fag".

I don't. But I'm not starting multiple topics just to call someone a fag.

Why you think hiding behind hypocrisy is a sound strategy.

Who said it was a strategy? I admit I can be at times. Which puts me one step ahead of you. (It works in with the whole "you're always right" thing.)

Why you have taken a user name of a fictitious Vulcan Star Trek character, who are supposed to be logical and rational when you are clearly neither.

Oh, what an insult.

I'll admit, you are good at depate. But you destroy your credibility and shatter the illusion that you are capable of intelligent conversation with comments like that. It says you're to stupid to actually understand that sometimes, people choose usernames just because they like the name and it might not be a reflection of the true person behind the name.

You're welcome for yet another learning experience courtesy or RWC, and thanks again for being a fan.

Another? Where was the first one?

Oh, BTW, nice subtitle *cough* cough* gay references. I can assure you I am not gay.

However, I must assume that as you are aware that we reside within the same Metro area, you are and are using the oppertunity to try and "hook up".

Not interested. And even if I was, my wife wouldn't allow it. You may however want to try the downtown area. I'm sure you know where.

 

[Gagh]

I said the ability to give someone negative Karma serves a purpose. Repetatively giving someone negative karma serves none.

His sole use of the Karma system is too leave comments in your CP to piss you off. Alas, it would appear he has succeeded.

 

[Sarek]

His sole use of the Karma system is too leave comments in your CP to piss you off. Alas, it would appear he has succeeded.

Not really. Because RWC has never negged me or left comments in the karma box.

I just think he's a good debater but it's overshadowed by his blind stupidity on some issues and the affliction that he is always right no matter the circumstances.

 

[RWC]

It amazing how you carry on a conversation with no clue as to the content of said converstaion. I said the ability to give someone negative Karma serves a purpose. Repetatively giving someone negative karma serves none.

His sole use of the Karma system is too leave comments in your CP to piss you off. Alas, it would appear he has succeeded.

Bingo.

You countered with "Not really. Because RWC has never negged me or left comments in the karma box."

This is funny because

1. not only did you call me an idiot over the issue, it wasn't even your issue. I pissed you off by doing it to someone else.

2. Based on what you're calling others "idiots" and "easily amused" over, your little yellow bus is in front of the pack. Beep Beep!

So the bottom line to everything with you is 'I'm right, you're wrong because I said so."

Your statement claims that I'm guilty of subjectivism. Your statement itself says little more than "I believe x to be true, therefore x is true." Now try and keep up. You're guilty of the fallacy you're accusing me of, and it was never true of my assertions in the first place. I've done more than my share of illustrating my points. So much for your credibility.

Your supposed point was just another on your long list of baseless assertions. I was open to the fact that I may have misinterpreted what you were saying. Again, I stated "If that's the case", and that my special friend was a qualifier.

I like to LMAO over your lame attempts to justify both your penchant for being an asshole and your displayes of "extreme intelligence" that seem to come from the dumbest worker in a fortune cookie factory.

The only "lame attempts" here are your lame attempts at humor. I never claimed my words were (as you put it) displayes of "extreme intelligence". It's only your sad attempt at undermining my words because you can't intelligently refute them. Little kids tend to call things they don't understand "dumb", too. In your case it's concepts and comprehension.

I'm not starting multiple topics just to call someone a fag.

Neither have I, stupid.

I said: "you think hiding behind hypocrisy is a sound strategy."

Who said it was a strategy? I admit I can be at times. Which puts me one step ahead of you. (It works in with the whole "you're always right" thing.

)

It is your strategy no matter how desperately you try and deny it, and it never puts you ahead of anything no matter how desperately you wish it did. Your best argument is "just because a hypocrite doesn't mean I'm wrong". Good for you, dummy. But let's tell the whole truth- on your own scale of what's wrong and stupid you're the most wrongest and most stupidist, and yes, that was meant to sound stupid.

I said: "you have taken a user name of a fictitious Vulcan Star Trek character, who are supposed to be logical and rational when you are clearly neither"

I'll admit, you are good at depate. But you destroy your credibility and shatter the illusion that you are capable of intelligent conversation with comments like that. It says you're to stupid to actually understand that sometimes, people choose usernames just because they like the name and it might not be a reflection of the true person behind the name.

I don't care what you say. You named yourself after a Star Trek character. That most definitely makes you a douche. Aside from that you've only provided a red herring to draw attention away from the fact of what I said: You are neither logical nor rational. Fact.

You can try and convince yourself that "I disagree, therefore you're stupid" all you want. If logic worked like that you would no doubt be a genius. "If".

And since you're a fan of left-handed compliments here's one for you: You started off sounding somewhat intelligent, stating your case. Then I lost all respect for you when presented with a challenge you couldn't think your way out of. That's ok in itself, but your frustration is apparent when you start with the name-calling, and claim everything "lame". If that weren't bad enough you start reiterating my message until the original meaning is lost and dumb it down until it's just palatable enough for you to handle. And what you prove when you address a Straw man? Absolutely nothing, unless you consider having to made shit up in the absence of a cohesive argument a positive quality.

 

[eloisel]

Screw all of the above. I just want my stars back. The stars were nice.

 

[Sarek]

Bingo.

You countered with "Not really. Because RWC has never negged me or left comments in the karma box."

This is funny because

1. not only did you call me an idiot over the issue, it wasn't even your issue. I pissed you off by doing it to someone else.

2. Based on what you're calling others "idiots" and "easily amused" over, your little yellow bus is in front of the pack. Beep Beep!




Your statement claims that I'm guilty of subjectivism. Your statement itself says little more than "I believe x to be true, therefore x is true." Now try and keep up. You're guilty of the fallacy you're accusing me of, and it was never true of my assertions in the first place. I've done more than my share of illustrating my points. So much for your credibility.

Your supposed point was just another on your long list of baseless assertions. I was open to the fact that I may have misinterpreted what you were saying. Again, I stated "If that's the case", and that my special friend was a qualifier.



The only "lame attempts" here are your lame attempts at humor. I never claimed my words were (as you put it) displayes of "extreme intelligence". It's only your sad attempt at undermining my words because you can't intelligently refute them. Little kids tend to call things they don't understand "dumb", too. In your case it's concepts and comprehension.



Neither have I, stupid.

I said: "you think hiding behind hypocrisy is a sound strategy."

)

It is your strategy no matter how desperately you try and deny it, and it never puts you ahead of anything no matter how desperately you wish it did. Your best argument is "just because a hypocrite doesn't mean I'm wrong". Good for you, dummy. But let's tell the whole truth- on your own scale of what's wrong and stupid you're the most wrongest and most stupidist, and yes, that was meant to sound stupid.

I said: "you have taken a user name of a fictitious Vulcan Star Trek character, who are supposed to be logical and rational when you are clearly neither"



I don't care what you say. You named yourself after a Star Trek character. That most definitely makes you a douche. Aside from that you've only provided a red herring to draw attention away from the fact of what I said: You are neither logical nor rational. Fact.

You can try and convince yourself that "I disagree, therefore you're stupid" all you want. If logic worked like that you would no doubt be a genius. "If".

And since you're a fan of left-handed compliments here's one for you: You started off sounding somewhat intelligent, stating your case. Then I lost all respect for you when presented with a challenge you couldn't think your way out of. That's ok in itself, but your frustration is apparent when you start with the name-calling, and claim everything "lame". If that weren't bad enough you start reiterating my message until the original meaning is lost and dumb it down until it's just palatable enough for you to handle. And what you prove when you address a Straw man? Absolutely nothing, unless you consider having to made shit up in the absence of a cohesive argument a positive quality.

Oh Jesus.

Douche, cocksucker, pussy, homo, gayboy, faggot, pole smoking retard, hypocrite.

There. I've just broken down every reply you've made in this topic to it's basic element.

You haven't pissed me off in the least. I've spent the entire time laughing my ass off at you and your attempts to portray yourself as well read and well versed. Now run along and play. But don't forget to toss a few gay sex refrences my way before you leave.

 

[убийца гнома]

Oh Jesus.

Douche, cocksucker, pussy, homo, gayboy, faggot, pole smoking retard, hypocrite.

There. I've just broken down every reply you've made in this topic to it's basic element.

You haven't pissed me off in the least. I've spent the entire time laughing my ass off at you and your attempts to portray yourself as well read and well versed. Now run along and play. But don't forget to toss a few gay sex refrences my way before you leave.

fuck you in teh neck

 

[RWC]

Oh Jesus.

Douche, cocksucker, pussy, homo, gayboy, faggot, pole smoking retard, hypocrite.

There. I've just broken down every reply you've made in this topic to it's basic element.

If that weren't bad enough you start reiterating my message until the original meaning is lost and dumb it down until it's just palatable enough for you to handle.

You haven't pissed me off in the least. I've spent the entire time laughing my ass off at you and your attempts to portray yourself as well read and well versed. Now run along and play.

Your mischaracterization of my words whether deliberate or unintentional is a pretty good match with your thinly veiled frustration. And it's a good thing, because your failing to wrap your mind around my key points makes you 3 for 3.

But don't forget to toss a few gay sex refrences my way before you leave.

Thanks for being a fag.

It's kind of sad. When he isn't hiding behind hypocrisy, Sarek's second favorite tactic is avoiding the key points and desperately clinging to irrelevant distractions. It's a good thing I called him a "douche", otherwise his rebuttal would've been 100% irrelevant instead of the 87.5% he has now. It's akin His wife divorcing him because of the pathetic slob he's become, and after he's been cleaned out him cutting off his own penis and saying to her "look what you'll never have again! Pwned!"

 

[Sarek]

^You are absolutely correct. And I will change that just for you. From now on, I am only going to present arguments in the fashion that you are so adept at. Hopefully, it will end this conflict in a manner satisfactory to both of us.

If that weren't bad enough you start reiterating my message until the original meaning is lost and dumb it down until it's just palatable enough for you to handle.

Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Stupid blah, blah, blah, blah.

Your mischaracterization of my words whether deliberate or unintentional is a pretty good match with your thinly veiled frustration. And it's a good thing, because your failing to wrap your mind around my key points makes you 3 for 3.

Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Stupid blah, blah, blah, blah. Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Gay blah, blah, blah, blah. Faggot Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Blah, blah, blah, blah. Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Homo blah, blah, blah, blah.

Thanks for being a fag.

Thanks for being a fag

It's kind of sad. When he isn't hiding behind hypocrisy, Sarek's second favorite tactic is avoiding the key points and desperately clinging to irrelevant distractions. It's a good thing I called him a "douche", otherwise his rebuttal would've been 100% irrelevant instead of the 87.5% he has now. It's akin His wife divorcing him because of the pathetic slob he's become, and after he's been cleaned out him cutting off his own penis and saying to her "look what you'll never have again! Pwned!"

Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Stupid douche, cocksucker. Blah, blah, blah, blah. Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Faggot gayboy blah, blah, blah, blah. Pole smoking hypocrite. Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. insert some worthless accusation regarding RWC’s personal life that I would have no clue or knowledge about because it will sound good and make me look like I know what I’m talking about. (RWC is a pathetic slob who fondles 3 year old boys. The Police have overlooked it because he’s providing sexual favors to the all male city council) Then insult him for his stupid fag initials for a username because that will make me look cool too and add credibility to my argument. Even though it has nothing to do with the argument. Blah, blah, blah, blah. Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Blah, blah, blah, blah.

There. Did I get your style down right? I’m not quite sure of the placement of the faggot insult in my second reply. Seems it might be better used after the use of homo. Makes the sentence flow better.

Anyway, thanks for being a fag, er, I mean fan.

 

[RWC]

Poor Sarek. He operates from the same predefined templates over and over. When he fails he attempts to try his hand at mimicking others and he still fails. In a desperate attempt to save face he says the stupidest shit possible to cover for his weakness: his lack of ability. Poor incapable Sarek.

 

[Sarek]

^It's not lack of ability. It's because I just don't give a shit. You're an idiot plain and simple.

 

[Lord Raffles]

^It's not lack of ability. It's because I just don't give a shit. You're an idiot plain and simple.

Get back to the gutter - RWC has triumphed yet again.

 

[Sarek]

Get back to the gutter - RWC has triumphed yet again.

So go give him his victory blowjob and make his win a memorable one.

 

[RWC]

Look at that, Raffles. You made him challenge your sexuality because of his lack of creativity. Pwned.

 

[Sarek]

Look at that, Raffles. You made him challenge your sexuality because of his lack of creativity. Pwned.

Just following your example. Pwned.

 

[RWC]

Piss poor credibility, stupid comeback. Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Sarek.

 

[Sarek]

Good boy. There's no homosexual references in that reply.

See? You are capable of learning new things. Regardless of what your mother says.

 

[RWC]

Bad boy. You said "homosexual".

Sorry, you're using the same stupid reply template. Your uncle... oops. Never mind.

 

[bad dog]

You two just gave sarek a gang bang, he needs a smoke break.