Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

So...Storm comes back to WF and immediately gets two WARNINGS.

Conundrum

New member
After at least two flames in the help desk...

Storm said:
Do I look like I care if I get a warning, you dirty old bitch?

Later in the thread...

Storm said:
I have a clean rap sheet right now. Two warnings won't push me into ban territory.


Later...

Elwood said:
Jesus Christ. Will you three knock it off? Storm, warned twice. ShootER, warned once. CD, warned once.



Now on any other fucking board in the universe if the management allows a banned poster to come back and the poster immediately begins violating the rules again they would be re-banned so fast their ass would make a sonic boom as it left the board. All Storm has done is flame and troll in THIS (It starts on page 3 or 4) Help Desk thread. I mean openly saying you don't care about warnings and bragging that your friends have given you a tabula rosa.


At thispoint I gotta ask, is Elwood sitting home thinking up ways to destroy his and the rest of the staffs credibility???
 
Conundrum said:
After at least two flames in the help desk...



Later in the thread...




Later...





Now on any other fucking board in the universe if the management allows a banned poster to come back and the poster immediately begins violating the rules again they would be re-banned so fast their ass would make a sonic boom as it left the board. All Storm has done is flame and troll in THIS (It starts on page 3 or 4) Help Desk thread. I mean openly saying you don't care about warnings and bragging that your friends have given you a tabula rosa.


At thispoint I gotta ask, is Elwood sitting home thinking up ways to destroy his and the rest of the staffs credibility???

Wait . . . so now we want MORE bannings? Fuck that. I started an account over here BECAUSE of bannings. People lobbying for Storm's banning are playing high school politics.
 
I want them to get a fucking clue. This is just evidence that the people running WF have no clue beyond maintaining their little cliques.
 
chucklemeister said:
I got tickled that Bonzie finally saw the light.

:lol:

I've never been blind about Storm. And I know that some favor him.

That doesn't mean the whole board is rubbish though. :roll:
 
Christ, Storm is blatantly shitting on Elwood's reputation. The more he is allowed to get away with this crap, the worse Elwood looks for allowing it to happen.

With friends like that, who needs enemies? :shrug:
 
Or maybe we're complaining because of the bizarreness of WF's personal information rule, it's seemingly gone from being "personal information is such a serious matter that you'll be permabanned if there's even a slight chance that you might someday in the future reveal anything" to "if you actually threaten someone with personal information during a troll all you'll get is a week long timeout."
MWUAHAHAHAHA!!
 
Wait. So not only did he make a more serious threat than Goldeneye got banned for life for CheekyMonkey making, he got let back in before everyone else AND he didn't even get a WARNING for the threat!? :huh:

Shit. So--flame someone and get a warning that lasts for six months, threaten to try and get someone fired from their job and get banned for a week? What complete and utter fucking bullshit. I think the writing is pretty much on the wall.

So what do you think Gul and the rest of you fuckers I PM'ed that Declaration of [Wordforge] Independence to? It's starting to look less and less outrageous by the hour, isn't it? :dry:
 
No....those weird committees and voting for everything but when to fart is still outrageously unworkable regardless of what happens at WF.

But who knows...maybe you will be the special ingredient that can pull it all together. *shrug*
 
Heheh... Shit. I just had a realization: The reason I was given that I was removed as a moderator (and lost A51 access) was my inability to be objective and separate my personal views from my moderating--even though I hadn't warned anyone for anything or moved or edited any threads or anything.

I wish I could be more objective and let my personal views color my actions. Like Tamar. Or Cass. Or Listkeeper. Or I-Banned-A-Guy-Because-His-Girlfriend-Spurned-Me.

Now that's irony.

Or is it hypocrisy? :calli:

Meh. They smell the same to me. :dry:
 
Volpone said:
Heheh... Shit. I just had a realization: The reason I was given that I was removed as a moderator (and lost A51 access) was my inability to be objective and separate my personal views from my moderating--even though I hadn't warned anyone for anything or moved or edited any threads or anything.

I wish I could be more objective and let my personal views color my actions. Like Tamar. Or Cass. Or Listkeeper. Or I-Banned-A-Guy-Because-His-Girlfriend-Spurned-Me.

Now that's irony.

Or is it hypocrisy? :calli:

Meh. They smell the same to me. :dry:

It was me, wasn't it? :(
 
Top