See, here's the problem I have with debating Liberals: They don't like to include all the facts. Grammour Boy and Patti Davis stated that President Bush basically outlawed stem cell research using "embryos that would be destroyed anyway".
While that would certainly support their position that the Bush Administration is a bunch of anti-science, religious zealots, the statement is not factual.
President Bush did not make it illegal to pursue stem cell research; he merely vetoed a bill that would allow Federal Funds to be used for stem cell research. In essence, he protected those taxpayers who are against stem cell research from contributing to something they are vehemently against. Scientists are perfectly free to pursue stem cell research to their hearts' content, they just have to use private funds. So what's the problem with that?
Is that rational enough for you, Hambil, or does laying out all the facts make you cringe?