Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

TK Drama: Summer 2006. The Motion Picture: Episode II

I am a millionaire.

I am a millionaire

I am a millionaire

Nope, just saying something over and over doesn't make it so.

Damnit.
 
Nice thread, pedophile. Why don't you go make a movie about... oh, wait. That would send you to prison.
 
photo-egg-3.jpg


nogoi1.jpg
 
RWC: You know... While you have and enjoy the freedom of speech, which includes the freedom of opinion... you don't have the freedom to be an arrogant asshole who holes himself up at the first sign of critique (especially when that critique was meant as humour).
And especially, you don't enjoy the freedom to make baseless accusations. Far be it from me to deny you your right to have an opinion, but as you have no shred of evidence of Mentalist's supposed paedophilia save on St. Lucifer's rather decredited word, it would be in your best interest to keep this adage in mind: If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all.
 
Lilac said:
*Smiles* Think what you will.


Bzzzt. WRONG! That isn't Mentalist's AV. That's shatter's.

- uses a picture of the same girl as part of his sig.
- posts images of a 16 year old Michelle Trachtenburg.[/quote]
Who isn't in any way or form in an illegal pic at any time on LoNAF, and from what I hear from other LoNAFites, in no way affiliated with Troll Kingdom, does not appear in any 'morally compromising' pictures.
Try again.


See Mentalist's answer.

Which falls back to my LoNAF section reply: Not illegal. Compared to the BrowserCrasher you ADMIT to posting...

(BTW, I hate to say it, but 12 year olds are legal in Holland.)

Try again.[/QUOTE]


Bzzzt. WRONG! That isn't Mentalist's AV. That's shatter's.

Really? I beg to differ little one. What is this below then? My imagination? She looks 12 to me so why is he using this as part of his sig? You said he was clearly not using a 12 year old girl as part of his sig. The image below would prove otherwise sweetums.
lazytownjuliannarosemaurielwt8.gif


- uses a picture of the same girl as part of his sig.
- posts images of a 16 year old Michelle Trachtenburg.
Who isn't in any way or form in an illegal pic at any time on LoNAF, and from what I hear from other LoNAFites, in no way affiliated with Troll Kingdom, does not appear in any 'morally compromising' pictures.
Try again.

Who said anything about the images being 'illegal'? I merely pointed out he likes extremely young girls and that he posted images of them. I never said anything about them being illegal. Naturally if he truly followed his own sickness he would be behind bars now then wouldn't he? Even pedophiles are not stupid enough post the 'illegal' images so they substitute the 'illegal' images of little girls with 'legal' ones.

You see no problem with MENTALCASE and his lust for a 16 year old girl? Do you understand this is a girl who would be in Grade 11 at a high school and there he is a fully-grown man of what? 45? You do not think this is sick?


*Smiles* Think what you will.

The old 'I am so tough I can do anything I want to you so easily it makes me smile' tactic. Christ on a stick and you are still using it? Shit. That crap went out with the dinosaurs.


Which falls back to my LoNAF section reply: Not illegal. Compared to the BrowserCrasher you ADMIT to posting...

Psst. Posting browser-crashers is not illegal and I freely admitted it because I knew this and laughed at idiots such as yourself who fell for it. Now you compare my posting a simple browser crasher with a man who could be a danger to little girls? How do you know MENTALIST is not hanging around in schoolyards watching little girls and daydreaming? Trust me, a browser-crasher is not even worth mentioning by comparison dipshit.

(BTW, I hate to say it, but 12 year olds are legal in Holland.)

You clearly back pedophilia with this statement alone. Whether having sex with 12 year old girls in Holland is legal or not is completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand. It is simply ill-advised to advertise one's status as a clear pedophile which MENTALCASE has done here.
 
Lilac said:
RWC: You know... While you have and enjoy the freedom of speech, which includes the freedom of opinion... you don't have the freedom to be an arrogant asshole who holes himself up at the first sign of critique (especially when that critique was meant as humour).
And especially, you don't enjoy the freedom to make baseless accusations. Far be it from me to deny you your right to have an opinion, but as you have no shred of evidence of Mentalist's supposed paedophilia save on St. Lucifer's rather decredited word, it would be in your best interest to keep this adage in mind: If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all.

it would be in your best interest to keep this adage in mind: If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all.

Resorting to threats now are we? Waaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh! I want my mommy!

The moment one resorts to threats is the moment one has lost. Go slink back into your corner to fret and sulk all you want. PALADIN has made you his bitch once again. Either threaten me yet again or run along.
 
Really? I beg to differ little one. What is this below then? My imagination? She looks 12 to me so why is he using this as part of his sig?
It's part of my sig on TK. Not Lonaf like you cited incorrectly. You also cited Shatters av which has the same character and she's 15 as it happens but thats totally irrelevant anyway except for proving you wrong yet again.


Do you understand this is a girl who would be in Grade 11 at a high school and there he is a fully-grown man of what? 45? You do not think this is sick?

Since when am I 45? News to me. Do you make a habit of being utterly wrong? I'm less than half that age you goon.



Idiot.
 
Mentalist said:
It's part of my sig on TK. Not Lonaf like you cited incorrectly. You also cited Shatters av which has the same character and she's 15 as it happens but thats totally irrelevant anyway except for proving you wrong yet again.




Since when am I 45? News to me. Do you make a habit of being utterly wrong? I'm less than half that age you goon.



Idiot.


It's part of my sig on TK. Not Lonaf like you cited incorrectly. You also cited Shatters av which has the same character and she's 15 as it happens but thats totally irrelevant anyway except for proving you wrong yet again.
http://www.trollkingdom.net/forum/showpost.php?p=847151&postcount=105
You are clearly a liar. I said you used the same sig both in here and on Troll Kingdom. I was there remember?

the same character and she's 15

Interesting that you know her age. Why is this? No one else did. Hmmm?
 
I like the shiny new handle for you shovel. You'll be able to dig your hole twice as fast now!

Let me spell out the presumptious mistake you made in the post I corrected you in: The machine thing chasing the girl isn't Mentalist's AV. That's shatter's AV. I never once mentioned that Mentalist didn't have her in his sig.
Paladin said:
Who said anything about the images being 'illegal'? I merely pointed out he likes extremely young girls and that he posted images of them. I never said anything about them being illegal. Naturally if he truly followed his own sickness he would be behind bars now then wouldn't he? Even pedophiles are not stupid enough post the 'illegal' images so they substitute the 'illegal' images of little girls with 'legal' ones.
You still haven't proved your allegations beyond a doubt, you know.

You see no problem with MENTALCASE and his lust for a 16 year old girl?
Nope, because you're seeing something that isn't there.
[/quote]Do you understand this is a girl who would be in Grade 11 at a high school[/quote]
Hmm, not anymore she isn't. Point's moot.
and there he is a fully-grown man of what? 45?
*Laughs* Did you pull that out of your ass? He's not much older than me. And the age difference between Trachtenburg and me is at most five years.
You do not think this is sick?
Not when the age difference is MUCH narrower than you claim.
The old 'I am so tough I can do anything I want to you so easily it makes me smile' tactic. Christ on a stick and you are still using it? Shit. That crap went out with the dinosaurs.
You'll need to forgive me then that your insults and lies don't bother me, but indeed do make me smile at your sillyness.


Psst. Posting browser-crashers is not illegal
If it violates board Terms of Service, then yes, it is illegal.
and I freely admitted it because I knew this and laughed at idiots such as yourself who fell for it.
I only know about it because of your silly little boast at LoNAF. I hadn't returned to Troll Kingdom yet to completely discredit you in your complaint against Eggs thread.
Now you compare my posting a simple browser crasher with a man who could be a danger to little girls?
Yep. What're you going to do about it?
How do you know MENTALIST is not hanging around in schoolyards watching little girls and daydreaming?
Oh, just a few sources that you're not privy to.
Trust me, a browser-crasher is not even worth mentioning by comparison dipshit.
Temper temper. You simply undermine your situation with those personal attacks.
You clearly back pedophilia with this statement alone.
Since you don't know me at all, I'll simply let you live with the knowledge that you're dead wrong.
Paladin said:
Resorting to threats now are we? Waaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh! I want my mommy!

The moment one resorts to threats is the moment one has lost. Go slink back into your corner to fret and sulk all you want. PALADIN has made you his bitch once again. Either threaten me yet again or run along.
Oh please. :roll:
I'll be specific when I make a threat.

You're baseless.
 
Paladin said:
Interesting that you know her age. Why is this? No one else did. Hmmm?
Because only a couple people watch the show, and I'm not one of them, and the other who does avoids Troll Kingdom?
 
Back
Top