CaptainWacky
I want to smell dark matter
The Crimson Horror - Another good Mark Gatiss episode! That's two this season! And two in total! This episode is silly and fun. I like how it goes almost full League of Gentlemen in embracing the Victorian penny dreadful style. Diana Rigg is very good as the villain. Okay she's just pure evil, but she's very good as pure evil. This is probably Strax's best episode so there's that too! Jenny gets more to do than usual and Catrin Stewart has a likable prescence (and looks good in her ninja outfit and yes good sonic erection joke.) Does this count as Doctor-lite when the Doctor's only absent for the first fifteen minutes? Maybe? Also...once the Doctor wakes up and explains everything in (very well done) flashbacks it kind of makes all the stuff with Vestra investigating pointless. But whatever, it's a fun episode and has a blind girl (Diana Rigg's real life daughter, fact fans!) refusing to forgive her dying mother then smashing an alien worm thing to death. That's good stuff.
(The worst part is the end scene where Artie and Angie blackmail Clara into letting them travel through time, but I have a feeling this wasn't written with the rest of the episode and was just stuck on there. It's really stupid (why doesn't Clara just let them tell their dad she's a time traveller? He won't believe them!) but at least it has Clara playing with a Galvatron toy!)
SCORE: 8/10
Nightmare In Silver - Okay Neil Gaiman is one of my favourite writers. Sandman is the best comic series ever and I've read most everything he's written. So I'm a bit biased into wanting to defend him for here. I remember him answering questions on tumblr about the episode and I got the impression he wasn't very happy how it turned out. It was going to have Victorian Clara and the Victorian kids originally (though I also read that it was going to be an Amy episode even before that) and we ended up with Artie and Angie instead and they're terrible. The "put me down I hate you!" line wasn't in the script and its delivery is terrible anyway. And I wonder how much of the Cybermen stuff was mandated by the BBC ("they should be able to run really fast now! But only once an episode!")
But there's no getting around that it's just not a very good episode. There's a lot of ideas but none of them reach their potential. The new Cybermen are too Borg-y. It's supposedly set in an amusement park but we don't get any amusment park stuff! The "comical castle" isn't even comical. The stuff with the Doctor facing off with evil Mister Clever Doctor is good thanks to Matt Smith but it could have been a lot better really. And Clara seems out of character in how confident she is at taking control of a military situation and it makes me believe that it was originally written for Amy. I mean the "impossible Clara in the tight skirt!" bit at the end is really similar to a bit about Amy that I can't quite remember the details of.
There is good stuff though! I like the idea that the soldiers are all on punishment duty and not good soldiers and the "stop, I'm in the army!" line is genuinely very funny. Warwick Davis does a good job playing the emporer (of course it's really obvious who he is.) So yeah it's not a low point of the show or anything but it's very disappointing.
(The Doctor "erasing himself from history" is mention so that's still a thing!)
SCORE: 6.5/10
The Name Of The Doctor - This episode...these Moffat finales...I wish I didn't always have the same problems with them but I always do? I mean this one is better than the Wedding Of River Song...I think? It's hard to judge it as an episode on its own becaue it's an episode made up of stuff stuck together and some of that stuff is awesome and some just leaves me cold.
Seeing Clara (with many different haircuts!) interacting with all the Doctors is on the aweomse side. The "INTRODUCING JOHN HURT" ending is probably the thing everyone remembers and it is awesomely done!
BUT it feels like Moffat's arcs are just "introduce a question, have the Doctor mention that question a lot, reveal that the quetion was kind of wrong, then quickly ask another question before anyone notices what's going on." And they're always a convoluted plan to kill the Doctor (well okay the most recent finale was a convoluted plan to give the Doctor any army of Cybermen.) The episode feels kind of lacking in plot. Partly becuase the Great Intelligence hasn't been featured nearly enough for his big speech at the Doctor to work. Richard E. Grant does a great job with the speech, but I don't buy at all that he's been defeated so many times by the Doctor that he wants to kill himself to "find rest" or whatever. He's only really been in one episode before this and about ten seconds of another (I know the character was in the old series too but I'm not reviewing that.)
Also everything's set up to seemingly fit the criteria Blue Guy's Head laid out about why the question of the Doctor's identity must never be answered. The "fall of the eleventh" could be the TARDIS falling to the planet, the answer to "Doctor who?" is how the GI gets inside the TARDIS to end the universe...but this isn't the resolution to that arc! That won't come until Christmas. So this is just another situation that could end the universe by asking "Doctor Who?" that happens to take place on the same planet...or maybe this is the one Blue Guy was warning him against...I don't know. It's not satisfying to me.
And River's there and she doesn't really need to be? It's not one of her more annoying appearances and the scene where she and the Doctor say goodbye is well acted but is she just there to flesh out an episode that doesn't have much plot?
And the WhisperMen are pretty half-assed Moffat concepts (complete with their own spooky nursery rhyme!) "They can't kill you until you hear them!" Okay? They look cool though.
And Clara's sacrifice would work better if her character wasn't written so generically.
And I keep starting sentences with and.
AND YET it's still an episode that moves along well and has good acting and a giant TARDIS and great use of archive footage and John Hurt (whose identity as the Doctor has nothing to do with why the question of "Doctor Who?" must never be asked even though this episode makes it look like it's connected?) so I DON'T KNOW.
SCORE: 7.75/10
(The worst part is the end scene where Artie and Angie blackmail Clara into letting them travel through time, but I have a feeling this wasn't written with the rest of the episode and was just stuck on there. It's really stupid (why doesn't Clara just let them tell their dad she's a time traveller? He won't believe them!) but at least it has Clara playing with a Galvatron toy!)
SCORE: 8/10
Nightmare In Silver - Okay Neil Gaiman is one of my favourite writers. Sandman is the best comic series ever and I've read most everything he's written. So I'm a bit biased into wanting to defend him for here. I remember him answering questions on tumblr about the episode and I got the impression he wasn't very happy how it turned out. It was going to have Victorian Clara and the Victorian kids originally (though I also read that it was going to be an Amy episode even before that) and we ended up with Artie and Angie instead and they're terrible. The "put me down I hate you!" line wasn't in the script and its delivery is terrible anyway. And I wonder how much of the Cybermen stuff was mandated by the BBC ("they should be able to run really fast now! But only once an episode!")
But there's no getting around that it's just not a very good episode. There's a lot of ideas but none of them reach their potential. The new Cybermen are too Borg-y. It's supposedly set in an amusement park but we don't get any amusment park stuff! The "comical castle" isn't even comical. The stuff with the Doctor facing off with evil Mister Clever Doctor is good thanks to Matt Smith but it could have been a lot better really. And Clara seems out of character in how confident she is at taking control of a military situation and it makes me believe that it was originally written for Amy. I mean the "impossible Clara in the tight skirt!" bit at the end is really similar to a bit about Amy that I can't quite remember the details of.
There is good stuff though! I like the idea that the soldiers are all on punishment duty and not good soldiers and the "stop, I'm in the army!" line is genuinely very funny. Warwick Davis does a good job playing the emporer (of course it's really obvious who he is.) So yeah it's not a low point of the show or anything but it's very disappointing.
(The Doctor "erasing himself from history" is mention so that's still a thing!)
SCORE: 6.5/10
The Name Of The Doctor - This episode...these Moffat finales...I wish I didn't always have the same problems with them but I always do? I mean this one is better than the Wedding Of River Song...I think? It's hard to judge it as an episode on its own becaue it's an episode made up of stuff stuck together and some of that stuff is awesome and some just leaves me cold.
Seeing Clara (with many different haircuts!) interacting with all the Doctors is on the aweomse side. The "INTRODUCING JOHN HURT" ending is probably the thing everyone remembers and it is awesomely done!
BUT it feels like Moffat's arcs are just "introduce a question, have the Doctor mention that question a lot, reveal that the quetion was kind of wrong, then quickly ask another question before anyone notices what's going on." And they're always a convoluted plan to kill the Doctor (well okay the most recent finale was a convoluted plan to give the Doctor any army of Cybermen.) The episode feels kind of lacking in plot. Partly becuase the Great Intelligence hasn't been featured nearly enough for his big speech at the Doctor to work. Richard E. Grant does a great job with the speech, but I don't buy at all that he's been defeated so many times by the Doctor that he wants to kill himself to "find rest" or whatever. He's only really been in one episode before this and about ten seconds of another (I know the character was in the old series too but I'm not reviewing that.)
Also everything's set up to seemingly fit the criteria Blue Guy's Head laid out about why the question of the Doctor's identity must never be answered. The "fall of the eleventh" could be the TARDIS falling to the planet, the answer to "Doctor who?" is how the GI gets inside the TARDIS to end the universe...but this isn't the resolution to that arc! That won't come until Christmas. So this is just another situation that could end the universe by asking "Doctor Who?" that happens to take place on the same planet...or maybe this is the one Blue Guy was warning him against...I don't know. It's not satisfying to me.
And River's there and she doesn't really need to be? It's not one of her more annoying appearances and the scene where she and the Doctor say goodbye is well acted but is she just there to flesh out an episode that doesn't have much plot?
And the WhisperMen are pretty half-assed Moffat concepts (complete with their own spooky nursery rhyme!) "They can't kill you until you hear them!" Okay? They look cool though.
And Clara's sacrifice would work better if her character wasn't written so generically.
And I keep starting sentences with and.
AND YET it's still an episode that moves along well and has good acting and a giant TARDIS and great use of archive footage and John Hurt (whose identity as the Doctor has nothing to do with why the question of "Doctor Who?" must never be asked even though this episode makes it look like it's connected?) so I DON'T KNOW.
SCORE: 7.75/10