So I’ve watched the first episode and I’ve come away with pretty mixed feelings.
For context, I dropped Discovery around season 2 because I just couldn’t keep going with it. I just had to tap out. It really wasn’t for me, which was a shame given how long Star Trek has been part of my life. Strange New Worlds brought me back somewhat. I had issues with it, but I enjoyed it a lot more than Discovery and it felt closer to the tone and discipline I associate with Trek.
I didn’t go into Academy hostile, or confused, or out of the loop. I've kept up with the lore.
I understand the 32nd century setting. I understand the Burn and the jump forward and all the hand waving that goes with it. I just don’t really like it. By the end of TNG and Voyager we were already stretching technology to the point where it was starting to dictate stories rather than serve them. Jumping several centuries further mostly just means inventing reasons why things suddenly don’t work anymore. Tech dark ages, selective regressions, etc. I get the hand waves, I just don’t really vibe with them.
Aesthetically, I’m really not a fan either. I don’t like the new ship designs at all. The floating nacelles look ridiculous. I’ve already mentally dubbed The Athena the USS Ladybits. I don’t care how many in-universe justifications are offered, it looks impractical and silly. And when the transporter fails in the first episode and entire parts of the ship become inaccessible, it just proves the point.
Classic Starfleet ships felt like you could actually operate them in a crisis. This feels like design for differentiation rather than function.
That said, even when I don’t like the choices, the production design itself is undeniably slick. It looks expensive. The craft side of the show is clearly being taken seriously except for one glaring issue I'll get to later.
Dialogue-wise, I winced a lot. Everyone enters every scene already armed with a speech. Everyone is witty. Everyone is sassy. Everyone sounds like they’ve rehearsed their lines in front of a mirror. It’s very try-hard. I love Buffy speak when it’s done well. This feels like a cheap knockoff version mixed with Marvel dialogue, where no one is allowed to be quiet or serious for more than a few seconds.
Older Trek let humour emerge naturally from character and situation. Here it feels pushed to the front constantly.
Before this gets misread, I want to be clear about something. The anti-woke outrage industry that surrounds everything actively makes it harder to talk honestly about these shows. There’s already been the usual campaign against Academy from the same people who make a living selling manufactured rage to idiots who think they’re enlisted in some kind of culture war. That stuff interests me not a jot. Sometimes they accidentally stumble onto a criticism I might agree with, but the place they’re coming from isn’t honest. It’s performative, monetised anger, and anyone buying into it wholesale is basically a mark. My issues with the show are not coming from that world at all.
Which brings me to Starfleet Academy itself. Representation isn’t the problem. It’s Star Trek, of course there should be representation. The problem is how heavy-handed it can feel, and how often it undercuts the idea that this is meant to be an elite institution. When we saw Starfleet training in TNG and DS9, it was made very clear that these people had worked their backsides off to be there. In this show, some of the cadets feel like they have no business wearing the uniform, and the writing just leans into that for laughs. Lines like “I swallowed my commbadge” are meant to be funny, but I prefer my Trek played straighter. Star Trek can be very funny without turning Starfleet into a joke.
The character writing is also very shortcut-heavy. You’ve got the bully character who is instantly a complete arsehole with no buildup, straight out of an 80s or 90s sitcom. Then almost immediately we’re told he’s actually kind of cool and it’s all a front. That sort of arc can work, but not when it’s speedrun in the first episode. Compare it to something like Ted Lasso, where a character like Jamie Tartt is allowed to be unpleasant for a long time and actually earn his growth. Here it just feels mechanical and writerly. Checkbox stuff.
That said, I didn’t hate the episode. It was watchable. I wasn’t checking the time or waiting for it to end. Holly Hunter was genuinely very good, and honestly she carried the episode for me. I didn’t buy her at all from the trailers, but in the actual show she brings authority, warmth, and a kind of calm gravity that the rest of the ensemble badly needs. When she’s on screen, things feel anchored. Paul Giamatti was clearly having a lot of fun hamming it up and that worked for me too.
Caleb is fairly cookie-cutter, chip on his shoulder but secretly brilliant, but he’s likeable and competent. I’m less sure about the hologirl (Photonic?). She could get annoying very quickly, though I did warm to her a bit by the end. If they lean properly into the dynamic between her and the Doctor, there’s potential there.
Bob Picardo as the Doctor was a delight, as always. He just understands Star Trek on a fundamental level and it’s immediately relaxing when he’s on screen. Is it memberberries? Yeah, but it was a very good choice getting him on the show.
Lura Thok was… okay. I personally didn’t have a big problem with the whole Klingon/Jem’Hadar thing. I don’t love the time jump in this series at all, but it does adequately explain her for me. It wasn’t eye-roll worthy.
One other thing I clocked pretty quickly is that I basically liked everyone over the age of 30 in this show straight away, and everyone under the age of 30 mildly annoyed me on some level. Yes, that is absolutely angry man yelling at cloud energy. I’m trying to grow. That said, this is literally Starfleet Academy, so that may just be an ongoing problem for me rather than a fatal flaw of the show.
One thing that really stood out in a bad way was the fight at the end between Caleb and Giamatti’s character. The direction and editing were genuinely awful. It was cut so poorly it felt amateurish, and I was honestly surprised it was allowed to go out like that. There were some really weird ADR errors as well. Nitpicky but noticeable.
Overall, I don’t think the show is a disaster. I don’t think it’s unwatchable or some abomination like some sections of the internet would lead you to believe. I also get that it’s probably not aimed squarely at me, and that Trek can’t just cater to older fans forever. That said, the way legacy elements are sometimes dangled in front of us as member-berries feels a bit try-hard too, Doctor excluded.
So yeah. I found it watchable. I didn’t love it. It rubbed me the wrong way more often than it got things right. I’ll probably give it more time, but so far it feels like another modern Trek show that’s occasionally fun, technically well made, and still slightly out of tune with what I personally want from Star Trek.
I'm not dropping it. I do want to see where this goes for the time being.