Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Concentration Camp Photos :::WARNING! GRAPHIC IMAGES!:::

jack

The Legendary Troll King
Finally found them. Here's the first one:

cc1.jpg
 
I'm no expert, but the first one looks like a bombing victim. The second one, I'm not sure what's wrong with him other than suffering from a bad case of facial sunburn. And he appears to be dead.

Incidentally, care to share the established source for these pics? They literally could be from anywhere.
 
CoyoteUgly said:
I'm no expert, but the first one looks like a bombing victim. The second one, I'm not sure what's wrong with him other than suffering from a bad case of facial sunburn. And he appears to be dead.

Incidentally, care to share the established source for these pics? They literally could be from anywhere.

They're both the same person. These are public domain from the Archives released a little more than a year ago now. Some of this stuff has been available right along though. There's a LOT of this, actually.

cc3.jpg
 
CoyoteUgly said:
Yeah, it looks photoshopped or otherwise photographically doctored... and a shitty job of it too.

C'mon, you can do better than that. You know I'm saving the best for after the argument develops :D
 
jack said:
C'mon, you can do better than that. You know I'm saving the best for after the argument develops :D
Well, no, they do look photoshopped or similar.

Wha argument? You're trotting out some pics of dead people and saying... what? Help me here.
 
I'm saying these are concentration camp photos, taken by the doctors and guards themselves.
 
Raffles, you've got to read this book. It's awesome. It's all about "Lord Horror" the notorious anonymous troll propagandist of the 40's that had a pirate radio broadcast all during WWII from somewhere within England. They were never able to find him, and he spewed fearsome Nazi propaganda all througout the campaign.

btw you guys these pictures couldn't be photoshopped, because this particular book was published in 1975.

I can't explain them, except to say that when I showed them to my uncle, he simply nodded and said, yes, he regularly took people out of the medical rooms that looked like that and worse. They often cremated the bodies to hide what they had done, more than any other reason.

This book is old. If these photos are faked, then my uncle, who was an Auschwitz mole is just an old Jew liar.

Except he never talks about it.
 
jack said:
btw you guys these pictures couldn't be photoshopped, because this particular book was published in 1975.
A. I thought you said:
These are public domain from the Archives released a little more than a year ago now.
B. Manipulating photos didn't start with PS... it's an old game. Here's a crude but famous example:

_134243_fairies.jpg


I can't explain them, except to say that when I showed them to my uncle, he simply nodded and said, yes, he regularly took people out of the medical rooms that looked like that and worse. They often cremated the bodies to hide what they had done, more than any other reason.
Where was he interned, and what dates?

This book is old. If these photos are faked, then my uncle, who was an Auschwitz mole is just an old Jew liar.
I'm going to avoid the obvious jab there.

Except he never talks about it.

Except to you?
 
no never to me, I have to get him REALLY fucking drunk to get him to talk to me about it.

They are some of the same photos. Some of this stuff has been circulating privately (probably unbeknownst to you deniers :D) The pictures they released most of this stuff was not for public viewing, but it matches up nicely with this book (thus confirming it's authenticity, at least for me, that these aren't faked pictures)

It's the garrotting, and the strangling that's most compelling to me. You don't strangle someone with a wire and say its a fucking bomb. Those fuckers must have masturbated to that slow asphyxiation twitch stuff.
 
jack said:
They are some of the same photos. Some of this stuff has been circulating privately (probably unbeknownst to you deniers :D) The pictures they released most of this stuff was not for public viewing, but it matches up nicely with this book (thus confirming it's authenticity, at least for me, that these aren't faked pictures)

I need to get this straight: did you get these pics from a book, an archive, or both? Because now I'm hearing three different sources, and I'd like to know the source of the pics.

Incidentally, I'm not a "denier." I'm a skeptic by nature. I'm also a professional historian whose job doesn't depend on towing any particular line of philosophy. If someone brings in a .54 Enfield and claims it was found at the Shiloh battlefield, I want some provenence on the piece before I'll believe it. Likewise, when someone starts dropping pics as evidence of an atrocity, I need a little more than your word on the matter.

It's the garrotting, and the strangling that's most compelling to me. You don't strangle someone with a wire and say its a fucking bomb. Those fuckers must have masturbated to that slow asphyxiation twitch stuff.

Funny, I don't get any particular emotions from viewing the pics. They're pics of a dead body, and that's all it means to me. It's interesting that you have an emotional reaction to them.

Lastly, if the generally accepted view of Nazi ideology is to be believed, then I doubt anyone masturbated... maybe enjoyed it, but no winkies out and stroking.
 
Tyrant said:
Consider yourself a heretic.

I consider myself honest, and I can afford to be.

When the topic comes up with other historians, I'm always surprised at reactions... more often than not, many others are willing to concede that the whole holocaust scenario has great room for further examination and declaring an historical event of this magnitude to be set in stone is silly. For example, is it possible the Germans were experimenting on prisoners but not conducting wholesale extermination? Yes, it's possible. There's certainly evidence that indicates that. There's a handful of scenarios possible here with varying degrees of probability. Of course, those historians who teach would never dare say such a thing in class.

I'm simply not falling for the picture waving game... those pics could have come from the Soviet Union for all I know, and given the scale of the Soviet propaganda machine at that time, I wouldn't be surprised.
 
Which leads me to another question that should be easy for Jack to answer: when and where were those pics taken? The documentation should be present in your book (he says whle laughing in his sleeve).
 
Top