California should be sealed off. Nobody from there leaves there. Place is a fucking tumor that's metastasized.
Aren't you a Californian who moved out? Self hate much?
California should be sealed off. Nobody from there leaves there. Place is a fucking tumor that's metastasized.
Aren't you a Californian who moved out?
Self hate much?
Please say sikeI got bored this evening and decided to just read a couple of threads at WF. It is amazing how just when you think they couldn't possibly crawl up their own asses any more or be more wrong they manage to do so. For example their "Trouble in America" thread which usually features posters praising left wing rioters, sharing half truths about police cases involving black suspects, and conspiracy theories. Eventually their conversation shifted to the Boogaloo Boys who are an anarchist group which identify as "anarcho-capitalist" but, of course, far left sources lie and wrongly claim anarchists are "far right". They are not; they are anarchists or at least a flavor of anarchists.
Boogaloo Boys are an extremist group but they definitely are not "far right" in the classical sense. They want the destruction or abolition of all governments but especially the US government. The groups are loosely organized without official chapters simply united around their "anarcho-capitalist" ideology. The group is multi-ethnic even though left wing reporters often lie and claim the group is some how "white supremacist. Boogaloo Boys prominently took part in BLM and Antifa riots hoping it would lead to revolution and the fall of the government. It is a bit weird to see Anarcho-capitalists working with anarcho-communists but they are both anarchists albeit opposing sides of anarchism.
I wish people would at least try to understand movements before they simply try to label them as something. I get that many of the far leftists at WF and else where desperately want to pretend that theor side isn't the violent ones but they are fooling themselves. There is a reason Boogaloo Boys showed up in mass to help with the BLM and Antifa riots and it wasn't because they were "far right". They were part of the umbrella of anarchists who wanted revolution so decided to be fellow travellers with two other revolutionary groups holding riots.
Why would he say either that or 'psych'?Please say sike
All the tame conservatives are interesting to me. Lanz, Paladin, Forbin... Living in places like DC, coastal California, and New Jersey, they already have to hide their views and opinions in order to keep their lives livable. And they seem to think that "if I only compromise and recognize opposing views, they'll reciprocate." Nope. Liberals see compromise and acceptance as a sign of weakness. If you have a chance to stomp them and you instead help them up, they resent you. Because they'd absolutely stomp you if the positions were reversed. There's a statue of Lenin in Seattle. Point out that it is a disgusting offense that has no place being on display in America and lefties will say "no one is forcing you to like it; freedom of speech." But they'll immediately tear down a statue of that horrible, horrible racist, Abraham Lincoln if given the chance. Because "hate has no place in our society." And some of these people...Personally, I don't believe in gaslighting. If you use facts and logic to persuade someone to change their views, that isn't gaslighting. And if someone is just systematically lying to you to change your views, you should be smart enough to stop listening to them. Yeah, it sucks in this day and age. ABC was pretty much the last objective network that I respected--about 5 years ago. Now it's worse than CBS in many regards. Pretty soon I'll be stuck wearing Wrangler jeans and...I dunno, Asics sneakers while listening to country music and going to NASCAR because Nike, Levis, pro sports, and pretty much all other entertainment actively uses any dollars I give them against me, trying to take away my freedom and tell me how to think.The one who's declined most noticeably in that corrosive environment, IMO, is Lanz.