She claimed she didn't agree to anything. It's in a thread here I'm too lazy to look up.
Thank Cthulu that
Azure and
Scorp also represent Canada over at WF, cause you're not much to brag on.
So...are you being deliberately dense, just not giving a shit at all and backing-up Cass on her "claim", or are you truly stupid? Her return was conditional, contingent on her agreement.
That she, and you for chrissakes, have done this little rhetorical breakdance around the obvious just makes you both look thick-headed and/or dishonest (no surprise there). This is exactly like running a red light for the second time, with your license in the balance, and telling the cop, "Yes...but officer, I never agreed that I was going to obey traffic signals, I'll just be on my way," then turning to high-five all the passengers.
14th Bedpan Boy said:
She thought her revealing Kirks name again would make it fair game on the board, and that it would lead to a rules change
If she believed it was fair game, why this next bit?
Birgit said:
Even tho Lanz said he would permaban me, he only banned me for a week. I don't know if this was by accident but it certainly is what I was gunning for.
She knew she'd be banned, was hoping to be banned, she said it right there. If she knew there'd be consequences going in, it's idiotic for you to have us believe that she didn't expect that it would be possible that she'd receive the full measure of consequences (Unless it's your contention that she's too stupid to understand concepts like these...and if that's what you're getting at, then WIN :techman: )
So...Perry Mason....got any other arguments on this or are you done whining for now?