I could fucking tell what her whole "storyline" was going to be from the start and knew that she'd win. I wonder if we'll ever get a winner who isn't literally evil again.
Was a completely contradictory, immature child in her interview on BOTS. Claimed she was "sticking up for people who can't stick up for themself" against Perez, then started slagging off poor Keith for "sitting on the fence" when he couldn't respond to her vile hate. And her bitterness at not winning (despite what she'll claim) was pathetic on BOTS.
Never in the history of Big Brother has there been a more obvious pre-scripted storyline than Katie's "redemption" and "softer side showing!" story. People were already talking about it before she'd even entered the house. It's like if someone's 99% horrible and 1% nice they become a hero for being so "real" but if they're 99% nice and 1% horrible that makes them "fake" and a "fence-sitter" or whatever tired words people like Hopkins use. And the storyline very nearly worked as idiots who fell for it and edgy trolls and UKIP voters managed to get her into second place. But in the end she went in to boos and came out to boos and finished second to a perfect example of the kind of person she hates. The "softer side" story was abandoned two minutes into her interview as her incredible bitterness at not winning shone through. And now she's back to slagging people off on Twitter. Probably the worst person to ever appear on Big Brother.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.