Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Motives of a Holocaust Revisionist

jack said:
Wansee and VASHEM especially can't be trusted. I see why you wave them as the proof banner.

Well again jack, don't get me wrong -- they're not proof of anything other than that... well, their shit ain't proof. You remember when we went over the photo galleries where the captions are basically just tacked onto photos that don't actually show what the captions are talking about. That's another instance of it. But I'm glad you at least see where I'm coming from, even if and when you don't agree.

Ed Gein had a real bead on that shit...especially the "dead energy" weird psycho voodoo shit, and the whole "watch the body die while masturbating" activity.

Uh... ew, weird shit indeed.

SALO wasnt made up. That filmmaker was killed for making that film. You know, where Hitler gets face shit on by little kids while fucking and killing one?

Um... haven't seen that, or even heard of it.

C'mon Danny, you KNOW it was a sickness. Get down with it.

Pff, not my thang, man. I've got my own perversion, think I'll stick with that. :D
 
I just heard that song on the radio; are you sure this:

"What I need is a good defense
cause Im feelin like a criminal."

isn't actually,

"What I need is a good defense
cause Im feelin like a crim in a hole"?
 
Are you sure Fiona Apple really actually sang the song, and that the whole thing wasn't just a conspiracy of the pseudo-alternative music industry?
 
Since no one's been Galileo'd for questioning that it was her who sang the song, I see no crime against humanity to rally against on that issue. :P
 
Evidence establishes facts.
Evidence includes any probative
matters offered by a fact finder
for inducing belief in a party's contention.
Probative facts are matters of evidence
required to prove ultimate facts.
Disputed facts are not facts.
Allegations are not evidence.
Contentions are not evidence.
Hearsay is not evidence.
Eye witness testimony is evidence.
Photographs or film is evidence.
 
El Machorro said:
Evidence establishes facts.

Wrong. Evidence supports claims. Check this against every claim produced by science based on evidence which is then later altered or wholly refuted by evidence.

Evidence includes any probative
matters offered by a fact finder
for inducing belief in a party's contention.

If said probative matters are confirmed, they become evidence.[/quote]

Probative facts are matters of evidence
required to prove ultimate facts.

Correct.

Disputed facts are not facts.

This is like saying that disputed land is not land. Find a better way to phrase that.

Allegations are not evidence.

Correct.

Contentions are not evidence.

Correct.

Hearsay is not evidence.

Correct.

Eye witness testimony is evidence.

Of the absolutely weakest kind, because eyewitnesses may easily be dishonest, mistaken or mislead in the interpretation of what they were witness to.

Photographs or film is evidence.

Conditionally correct; the conditions are these:

*The photographs or film were not staged or tampered with.
*The photographs or film are not misrepresented as depicting things which do not explicitly appear on the film.
 
Ask Daniel to argue on USENET again so he can claim the evil J00 conspiracy deleted his thread from the Internets!

Just kidding, Daniel. You are a swell guy.
 
Top