I haven't watched the links following the first, but couldn't get through the first.
Considering the history, as the various reporters said, their use of the word "occupation" is fallacious and deceitful.
After 1917 the entire area of Israel was awarded to the Jews. The area of Jordan was awarded to the arabs. At the time, very few people were living in "palestine" (a word that the arabs always gave to the JEWISH area and considered an insult) - mostly nomads and a few hardy stragglers.
Beginning with the return of the Jews from all over the world after 1917 (a trickle, but existant), workers from egypt, jordan, syria and lebanon were hired to help the jews rebuild several of the cities and infrastructure in israel.
Those workers came and went. They were temporary. At the time of the 1947 war, these temporary workers were used as advance soldiers and when the war against israel failed horribly, these workers came to be known as "palestinians." They weren't born there. Their families were elsewhere.
"Palestine" was a word forced by the Romans and had always referred to JEWS living in Israel.
Not until '47 did this fantasy of "occupation" emerge and not until the 1970s did the muslims in the area adopt the idea that they were "real palestinians."
When some media shitkicker starts talking about "history" and then claims israel is occupying anything, I turn the revisionist shit off.
The politics of this "occupation" are such: there are 20 times more "original" "palestinians" now claiming birth in israel than there were in 1947. Sort of like the joke that 1 in 3 New Yorkers are holocaust survivors.
That first link was pure propaganda that had nothing to do with historical truth.