We do business with plenty of countries with unsavory practices. Unless one make all their textiles using a spinning jenny and only consume foodstuff native to one's state, we *all* pay into some sweatshop or illegal shrimp farm in Thailand that practices indentured servitude.
Certainly, I don't applaud Clinton for this but I refuse to accept a thin skinned blowhard that throws baby tantrums when someone says mean things about him and who is a notorious cheat in business was a better choice. It's like choosing between being buutfucked with lemon juice lube or cayenne pepper.
And yet the Democrats ran someone who was judged to be
far worse, someone who made millions giving secret speeches to Wall Street banks where she said that her public position was different from her real position, and that the best people to regulate Wall Street banks was Wall Street bankers.
She made millions massively escalating weapons sales to oil rich Middle Eastern Sunni states, and shipped enormous amounts of arms to Sunni rebels in Syria (al Qaeda, al Nusra, ISIS, and others) while peddling the fiction that the weapons were going to a secular opposition.
And when pressed, she flatly refused to de-link herself from the Clinton Foundation's fundraising activities, and said those would continue while she was President. The only way to stop her corrupt criminal organization and its influence peddling scheme was to strip her of any political influence, which we did.
So now she's trying to rake in a few more millions in the ridiculous recount effort, surely knowing that only three state-wide races in the entire nation have been flipped by a recount in the last 15-years, and those would have been races where the margin was hundreds of votes, not tens of thousands of votes.
